After Six Decades of Systematic Study of Creativity: What Do Teachers Need to Know About What It Is and How It Is Measured?

REFERENCES

• Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 41–53. doi:10.1037/a0038501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adobe. (2012, November 7). Creativity and education: Why it matters. Retrieved from https://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pdfs/Adobe_Creativity_and_Education_Why_It_Matters_study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sabaty, I., & Davis, G. A. (1989). Relationship between creativity and right, left, and integrated thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 111–117. doi:10.1080/10400418909534304
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The Creative Environment Scales: Work Environment Inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231–253. doi:10.1080/10400418909534321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, M., & Runco, M. A. (2005). Predicting entrepreneurship from ideation and divergent thinking. Creativity & Innovation Management, 14, 311–315. doi:10.1111/caim.2005.14.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1994). The Team Climate Inventory: Manual and user’s guide. Windsor, England: ASE/NFER-Nelson Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2010). Is creativity domain-specific? In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 321–341). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2011). Domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 404–408). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165–178. doi:10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963–970. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2012). Creative thinking in music: Its nature and assessment through musical exploratory behaviors. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 6, 231–242. doi:10.1037/a0027307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., & Finkbeiner, C. T. (1985). Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(1), 37–49. doi:10.1177/002188638502100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 111–131. doi:10.1002/jocb.1990.24.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 21–32. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0901_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77–100. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Taggar, S., & Pringle, P. (1999). Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 75–111. doi:10.1002/jocb.1999.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. S., Wakabayashi, M., & Takai, J. (1992). Training effects on the divergent thinking attitudes of Japanese managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 329–345. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(92)90056-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2009). The relationship between creativity, schizotypy and intelligence. Individual Differences Research, 7, 272–284.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309–319. doi:10.1037/a0029171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, S. W., Nibbelink, B., Towner-Thyrum, E., & Vredenburg, D. (2013). Defining characteristics of creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 38–47. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.752190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). Enhancement of ideational fluency by means of computer-based training. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 317–328. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 273–289. doi:10.1002/jocb.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. M., & Guilford, J. P. (1965). Match problems. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products—Three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333–346. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1986). Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 115–126. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: Review and synthesis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 158–178. doi:10.1002/jocb.1981.15.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. G. (1967). Effect of hypnosis and suggestions of reduced defensiveness on creativity test performance. Journal of Personality, 35, 311–322. doi:10.1111/jopy.1967.35.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 123–150. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality Processes And Individual Differences, 85, 499–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2000). Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 11(1), 69–82. doi:10.1080/713669176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2011). East vs. west. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 415–421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (2007). Creativity and drawing abilities of Chinese students in Hong Kong: Is there a connection? New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 155–162. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90185-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charyton, C., & Snelbecker, G. E. (2007). Engineers’ and musicians’ choices of self-descriptive adjectives as potential indicators of creativity by gender and domain. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 91–99. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.91
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A. J., Greenberger, E., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2002). Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 171–187. doi:10.1177/0022022102033002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Wang, W., Liu, K., & Chen, Y. (2010). Effects of association instruction on fourth graders’ poetic creativity in Taiwan. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Merrifield, P. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1965a). Alternate Uses—Form A. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 82–88. doi:10.1037/h0045461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., & Guilford, J. P. (1965b). Consequence. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, M. (2011). Testing/measurement/assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 458–464). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 828–841. doi:10.1177/0013164404263883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. J., McCrae, R. R., Stanton, M. V., Jonassaint, C. R., Williams, R. B., & James, S. A. (2010). NEO Personality Inventory—Revised. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72, 141–147.
   Google Scholar
• Cramond, B. (1994). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: From creation through establishment of predictive validity. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 229–254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Cramond, B. (2005). Fostering creativity in gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests. Developmental Psychology, 6, 119–124. doi:10.1037/h0032228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Aesthetics and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 24–28). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1970). Concern for discovery: An attitudinal component of creative production. Journal of Personality, 38, 91–105. doi:10.1111/jopy.1970.38.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 47–52. doi:10.1037/h0031106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovitch, N., & Milgram, R. M. (2006). Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 385–390. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A. (1975). In frumious pursuit of the creative person. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 75–87. doi:10.1002/jocb.1975.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. (1982). Group Inventory for Finding Interests (GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in the junior and senior high school. The Journal Of Creative Behavior, 16(1), 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., Subkoviak, M. J., Runco, M. A., Ebersole, P., & Mraz, W. (1991). How Do You Think Test. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 161–167.
   Google Scholar
• DeMoss, K., Milich, R., & DeMers, S. (1993). Gender, creativity, depression, and attributional style in adolescents with high academic ability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 455–467. doi:10.1007/BF01261604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, G. (2015). Creativity in medicine. Neurology, 84(8), e53–e54. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, R. (2009). Cognitive style, creativity framing and effects. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 234–261. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011–1026. doi:10.3758/BF03196731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–1035. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 389–398. doi:10.1080/10400410409534550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ee, J., Seng, T. O., & Kwang, N. A. (2007). Styles of creativity: Adaptors and innovators in a Singapore context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 364–373. doi:10.1007/BF03026466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, J. M. (1966). Problem-solving ability of creative and non-creative college students. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 81–83. doi:10.1037/h0022902
   Google Scholar
• Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105–123. doi:10.1080/13594329608414845
   Google Scholar
• Engle, D. E., Mah, J. J., & Sadri, G. (1997). An empirical comparison of entrepreneurs and employees: Implications for innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 45–49. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–327. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., & Freund, P. A. (2014). The professional context as a predictor for response distortion in the Adaption–Innovation Inventory—An investigation using mixture distribution item response theory models. International Journal of Testing, 14, 218–244. doi:10.1080/15305058.2013.862250
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. L. (2012). The rise of the creative class: Revisited. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fontenot, N. A. (1993). Effects of training in creativity and creative problem finding upon business people. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(1), 11–22. doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “Consequences” Test of Divergent Thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 536–540. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallucci, N. T., Middleton, G., & Kline, A. (2000). Perfectionism and creative strivings. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 135–141. doi:10.1002/jocb.2000.34.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, K. G., & Moran, J. D. (1990). Family adaptability, cohesion, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 281–286. doi:10.1080/10400419009534361
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., Gershon, A., Merrifield, P. R., & Guilford, J. P. (1965). Making objects. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gattis, M., & Raudsepp, E. (1969). How creative are you? Writer’s Digest, 4961.
   Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W. (1975). Creativity: Prospects and issues. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 326–344). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, K., & Torrance, E. P. (2000). Abbreviated Torrance Test for adults. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E. (1984). Personality characteristics associated with adaption–innovation. The Journal of Psychology, 117, 159–165. doi:10.1080/00223980.1984.9923672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, J. M., & Gilbert, O. (1979). Measurement of creativity: Development of an instrument and study of its reliability. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 11, 363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1965). The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110–118. doi:10.1037/h0048280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1965, August/September). Frames of reference for creative behavior in the arts. Paper presented at the Conference on Creative Behavior in the Arts, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1973). Characteristics of creativity. Springfield: Illinois State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Gifted Children Section.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Q., Hu, W., Liu, J., Jia, X., & Adey, P. (2013). The influence of peer interaction on students’ creative problem-finding ability. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 248–258. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.813754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2015). Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hébert, T. P., Cramond, B., Neumeister, K. L. S., Millar, G., & Silvian, A. F. (2002). E. Paul Torrance: His life, accomplishments, and legacy. Storrs: The University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (NRC/GT).
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208. doi:10.1080/10400419409534524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment technique. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Prtizker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 347–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T., & Mueller, J. (2011). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 253–260). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4(1), 25–40. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtz, J. C., Selby, E., Esquivel, G. B., Okoye, R. A., Peters, K. M., & Treffinger, D. J. (2003). Creativity styles and personal type. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 321–330. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. (2012). Leading through connections: Highlights of the Global Chief Executive Officer Study. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational Outlook Questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665–674. doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.85.2.665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption–innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psychological Reports, 63, 659–670. doi:10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C. M. (1993). Cognitive styles of creativity: Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaption–Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in USA. Psychological Reports, 72, 1131–1138. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336. doi:10.1177/073428290202000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaduson, H. G., & Schaefer, C. E. (1991). Concurrent validity of the Creative Personality Scale of the Adjective Check List. Psychological Reports, 69, 601–602. doi:10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltsounis, B. (1979). Black students’ personality traits associated with originality and elaboration. Psychological Reports, 44, 83–87. doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.44.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C. J., Lavish, L. A., & Brown, C. (2007). Creative styles and gender roles in undergraduates students. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 273–280. doi:10.1080/10400410701397396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaleefa, O. H., Erdos, G., & Ashria, I. H. (1996). Gender and creativity in an Afro-Arab Islamic culture: The case of Sudan. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 52–60. doi:10.1002/jocb.1996.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharkhurin, A. V., & Samadpour Motalleebi, S. N. (2008). The impact of culture on the creative potential of American, Russian, and Iranian college students. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 404–411. doi:10.1080/10400410802391835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatena, J. J., & Torrance, E. P. (1976). Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Khatena, J. J., & Torrance, E. P. (1988). Thinking creatively with sounds and words. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & Hull, M. F. (2012). Creative personality and anticreative environment for high school dropouts. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 169–176. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and behavior problems among underachieving elementary and high school students. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 185–193. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuan Chen, T. (2015). Assessing a Chinese version of the Runco Ideational Behavior Scale. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 43, 1111–1122. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.7.1111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lack, S. A., Kumar, V. K., & Arevalo, S. (2003). Fantasy proneness, creative capacity, and styles of creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(1), 19–24. doi:10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice teachers’ personality traits and engagement in creative activities as predictors of their support for children’s creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 82–94. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.873668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R., & Shiomi, K. (1997). A cross-cultural examination of the Kirton Adaption–Innovation Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 55–60. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00178-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, C., & Luh, D. (2012). A comparison of assessment methods and raters in product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 331–337. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.730327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2008). Creativity. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 247–270). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119–140. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2010). Developing a scale to measure the creative environment perceptions: A questionnaire for investigating garden variety creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 162–169. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1968). Remote Associates test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–214. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 155–166. doi:10.1080/10400419.2005.9651476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1999). Creative out-of-school activities in intellectually gifted adolescents as predictors of their life accomplishment in young adults: A longitudinal study. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 77–87. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, G. W. (2002). The Torrance kids at mid-life. Connecticut, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D., Hodges, P. A., & Kaufman, J. S. (2004). An exploratory study of the relationship between mood states and creativity self-perceptions. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 341–344. doi:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creativity in the workplace: People, problems, and structures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 1–6. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassif, C., & Quevillon, R. (2008). The development of a preliminary creativity scale for the MMPI-2: The C Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 13–20. doi:10.1080/10400410701839918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natrielli, D. F., Silva, M. E., & Natrielli, D. G. (2013). Medicine and creativity in medical psychology. São Paulo Medical Journal, 131, 281–282. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2013.1314638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. L. (2005). Talents and type ills: The effects of the Talents Unlimited model on creative productivity in gifted youngsters. Roeper Review, 27, 84–90. doi:10.1080/02783190509554295
   Google Scholar
• O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (2006). Using the Creative Product Semantic Scale as a metric for results-oriented business. Creativity & Innovation Management, 15(1), 34–44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00367.x
   Google Scholar
• Palaniappan, A. K. (1996). A cross-cultural study of creative perceptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82(1), 96–98. doi:10.2466/pms.1996.82.1.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannells, T. C., & Claxton, A. F. (2008). Happiness, creative ideation, and locus of control. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 67–71. doi:10.1080/10400410701842029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnoe, S. (1985). The relationship between selected scales of the Adjective Check List and musical creativity: A validation study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23(1), 64–66. doi:10.3758/BF03329780
   Google Scholar
• Piers, E. V., Daniels, J. M., & Quackenbush, J. F. (1960). The identification of creativity in adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 346–351. doi:10.1037/h0042669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Dana, R. Q. (1998). Alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use: Relationships to undergraduate students’ creative achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 472–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55–63. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Waitman, G. R., & Hartley, K. A. (2011). Education and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 435–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pohlman, L. (1996). Creativity, gender and the family: A study of creative writers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 1–24. doi:10.1002/jocb.1996.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollick, M. F., & Kumar, V. K. (1997). Creativity styles of supervising managers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 260–270. doi:10.1002/jocb.1997.31.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Wermer, C., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). The interrelationship between speeded and unspeeded divergent thinking and reasoning, and the role of mental speed. Intelligence, 39, 378–388. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 128–134. doi:10.1177/001698629103500304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Hartman, R. K. (1971). Scale for rating behavioral characteristics of superior students. Exceptional Children, 38, 243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2007). A technology based program that matches enrichment resources with student strengths. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2(3), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Siegle, D., Reis, S. M., Gavin, M. K., & Sytsma Reed, R. E. (2009). An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 84–108. doi:10.1177/1932202X0902100105
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robelen, E. W. (2012). States mulling creativity indexes for schools. Education Week, 31(19), 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/02/19creativity_ep.h31.html
   Google Scholar
• Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 273–290. doi:10.1080/00313830308602
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986a). The discriminant validity of gifted children’s divergent thinking test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 78–82. doi:10.1177/001698628603000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986b). Predicting children’s creative performance. Psychological Reports, 59, 1247–1254. doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.59.3.1247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 1996, 3–30. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1534-8687
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93–96. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2011). Implicit theories. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 641–646). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 11, 212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243–267. doi:10.1007/BF02213373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Assessing the accuracy of judgments of originality on three divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 14(2), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Ebersole, P., & Mraz, W. (1991). Creativity and self-actualization. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 6, 161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Eisenman, R. (2005). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships? Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 137–148. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2011). Products. Advantages of the rCAB. Athens, GA: Creativity Test Services. Retrieved from http://creativitytestingservices.com/
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 376–380. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.621859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (2011). Encyclopedia of creativity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M., & Tripp, S. (2014). The incremental validity of a short form of the Ideational Behavior Scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185–197. doi:10.1002/jocb.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M. (1995). Creativity and self-determination in personality. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 25–36. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 553–562. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34. doi:10.1037/a0024071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, N. F. (1996). Behavioral implications of adaption–innovation: II. Adaption–innovation and motivation for uniqueness. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 231–234. doi:10.2224/sbp.1996.24.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E., & Tegano, D. W. (1992). Relationship of scores on two personality measures: Creativity and self-image. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 43–49. doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowden, P., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual process theory and implications for creativity training. Thinking and Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B., & Lee, K. (2011). The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Componential models of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 415–421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Explorations in giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2012). Conceptions of creativity and relations with judges’ intelligence and personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 138–149. doi:10.1002/jocb.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung Eun Chung, S., & Meneely, J. (2012). Profiling group dynamics within business and design student teams: Relationships among personality traits, problem-solving styles, and creative performance. Journal of Interior Design, 37(3), 23–45. doi:10.1111/joid.2012.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, I. A., & Fish, T. A. (1979). The Creative Behavior Disposition Scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 11(1), 95–97. doi:10.1037/h0081577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, I. A., & Sandler, B. E. (1972, September). Use of a creative product inventory for evaluating products of chemists. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7(Pt. 1), 311–312.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1962a). Assessing the creative thinking abilities. In E. P. Torrance (Ed.), Guiding creative talent (pp. 16–43). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1962b). Non-test ways of identifying the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 6, 71–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1962c). Testing and creative talent. Educational Leadership, 20(1), 7–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1964). Guide for administrating and scoring Non-verbal Form B: Minnesota Test of Creative Thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms technical manual (Research ed.). Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1981). Thinking creatively in action and movement. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., McCarthy, B., Kolesinski, M., & Smith, J. (1988). Style of learning and thinking—Grades 6–12—Youth form. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test for creative thinking—Drawing production (TCT-DP) manual. Frankfurt, Germany: Swets Test Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, J. F. (1989). Creativity and cognition: Some implications for arts education. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 51–63. doi:10.1080/10400418909534300
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth edition technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. E., Tateishi, I., Wright, G. A., & Fonoimoana, M. (2012). Innovation 101: Promoting undergraduate innovation through a two-day boot camp. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 243–251. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A., Shen, F., & Smith, B. L. (2002). Judging advertising creativity using the Creative Product Semantic Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 241–253. doi:10.1002/jocb.2002.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A., & Smith, B. L. (2001). Assessing advertising creativity using the Creative Product Semantic Scale. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(6), 27–34. doi:10.2501/JAR-41-6-27-34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, F. E. (1993). Creativity assessment packet examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 362–370. doi:10.1037/h0060857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism–collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 355–366. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2015). Fostering successful intellectual styles for creativity. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 183–192. doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9378-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zysberg, L., & Schenk, T. (2013). Creativity, religiosity, and political attitudes. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 228–231. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.783761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar