Fostering Authentic Problem Seeking: A Step Toward Social Justice Engagement

REFERENCES

• Akom, A. A., Cammarota, J., & Ginwright, S. (2008). Youthtopias: Toward a new paradigm of critical youth studies. Youth Media Reporter, 2, 108–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (2013). Socioeconomic inequality and giftedness: Suppression and distortion of high ability. Roeper Review, 35, 81–92. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.766960
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, W., Quinn, T., & Stovall, D. (2009). Handbook of social justice education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165–178. doi:10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77–100. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., Coman, E., & Schensul, J. J. (2009). Youth action research for prevention: A multi-level intervention designed to increase efficacy and empowerment among urban youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 345–359. doi:10.1007/s10464-009-9231-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blount, A. G. (2006). Critical reflection for public life: How reflective practice helps students become politically engaged. Journal of Political Science Education, 2, 271–283. doi:10.1080/15512160600840533
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1976). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brugman, G. M. (1991). Problem finding: Discovering and formulating problems. European Journal of High Ability, 2, 212–227. doi:10.1080/0937445910020210
   Google Scholar
• Cammarota, J. (2007). A social justice approach to achievement: Guiding Latina/o students toward educational attainment with a challenging, socially relevant curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40, 87–96. doi:10.1080/10665680601015153
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, L. R., Jackson, B. J., & George, A. (2006). Principles of social justice education: The social justice education in schools project. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39, 55–64. doi:10.1080/10665680500478809
   Google Scholar
• Carson, D. K., & Runco, M. A. (1999). Creative problem solving and problem finding in young adults: Interconnections with stress, hassles, and coping abilities. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 167–190. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1992). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 155–162. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90185-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Hu, W., & Plucker, J. (2014). The effect of mood on problem finding in scientific creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 308–320. doi:10.1002/joch.79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, H. M., Fitchett, P. G., & Farinde, A. A. (2015). It takes courage: Fostering the development of critical, social justice–oriented teachers using museum and project-based instruction. Action in Teacher Education, 37, 9–22. doi:10.1080/01626620.2014.971136
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connecticut Invention Convention. (1983–2017). Retrieved from http://www.ctinventionconvention.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Cowhey, M. (2006). Black ants and Buddhists: Thinking critically and teaching differently in the primary grades. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28, 125–130. doi:10.1080/02783190609554351
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A., & Cropley, D. (2008). Resolving the paradoxes of creativity: An extended phase model. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38, 355–373. doi:10.1080/03057640802286871
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. R. (2013). Gifted education as a vehicle for enhancing social equality. Roeper Review, 35, 115–123. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.766962
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2013). Excellence at the cost of social justice? Negotiating and balancing priorities in gifted education. Roeper Review, 35, 93–101. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.766961
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54, 363–407. doi:10.3102/00346543054003363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 12–18. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00552.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W. (1979). Problem finding: A theoretical note. Cognitive Science, 3, 167–172. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(79)80030-0
   Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, C. M., & Ríos, A. (2014, July). Promoting 21st century problem seeking. Session conducted at the Neag Center for Gifted Education Conference, Storrs, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnough, K., & Cashion, M. (2006). Exploring problem-based learning in the context of high school science: Design and implementation issues. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 280. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb17919.x
   Google Scholar
• Han, K.-S., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 98–109. doi:10.1177/001698620204600203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Q., Hu, W., Liu, J., Jia, X., & Adey, P. (2013). The influence of peer interaction on students’ creative problem-finding ability. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 248–258. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.813754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsaker, S. L. (2005). Outcomes of creativity training programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 292–299. doi:10.1177/001698620504900403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, H., Hokanson, B., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2015). Teaching creative thinking skills: A longitudinal study. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33, 129–142. doi:10.1177/0887302x15569010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvin, L., & Subotnik, R. F. (2015). Academic talent development in North America and Europe. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 297–306. doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9370-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 139–151. doi:10.1002/jee.2006.95.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 289–296. doi:10.1017/S1049096506060471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, S. (1991). The figural problem solving and problem finding of professional and semiprofessional artists and nonartists. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 233–252. doi:10.1080/10400419109534396
   Google Scholar
• Kay, S. (1994). Theory to practice—Promoting problem-finding behavior in children. Roeper Review, 16, 195–197. doi:10.1080/02783199409553572
   Google Scholar
• LaBanca, F., & Ritchie, K. C. (2011). The art of scientific ideas: Teaching and learning strategies that promote creative problem finding. The Science Teacher, 78(8), 48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 57–74. doi:10.1002/jcop.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Cho, Y. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem situation. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 113–123. doi:10.3200/JOER.101.2.113-125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 77–113. doi:10.1177/016235320402800105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S. (2009). Gifted learners who drop out: Prevalence and prevention. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on giftedness (pp. 527–536). New York, NY: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S. (2013, October). Creative teaching and learning in U.S. education policy. Invited address presented at the 14th International Conference on Education Research, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S. (2014). Motivation and the academically able English learner. In M. S. Matthews & J. A. Castellano (Eds.), Talent development for English language learners: Identifying and developing potential (pp. 101–123). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S. (2018). Utilizing non-test assessments in identifying gifted and talented learners. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 135–145). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45–53. doi:10.1177/073428299100900104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Aiming talent development toward creative eminence in the 21st century. Roeper Review, 38, 140–152. doi:10.1080/02783193.2016.1184497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. (1963). Applied imagination (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Scribners.
   Google Scholar
• Pantić, N. (2015). A model for study of teacher agency for social justice. Teachers and Teaching, 21, 759–778. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., & Esping, A. (2015). Intelligence and creativity: A complex but important relationship. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 153–159. doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9374-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Burns, D. E. (2016). Curriculum compacting: A guide to differentiating curriculum and instruction through enrichment and acceleration (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). Problem finding. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 250–253). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O’Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9–23. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1982). What makes a problem real: Stalking the elusive meaning of qualitative differences in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 147–155. doi:10.1177/001698628202600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1997). Interest-A-Lyzer family of instruments: A manual for teachers. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 33–58. doi:10.1177/003172170208400109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., Westberg, K. L, … Sytsma Reed, R. E. (2013). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students: Renzulli scales (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2003a). Critical creative processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2003b). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317–324. doi:10.1080/0031383032000079272
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16, 235–241. doi:10.1080/02783199409553588
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211–220. doi:10.1007/BF01538162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 300–314. doi:10.1177/001698620504900404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starko, A. J. (2000). Finding the problem finders: Problem finding and the identification and development of talent. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 233–249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Starko, A. J. (2014). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suwa, M. (2003). Constructive perception: Coordinating perception and conception toward acts of problem-finding in a creative experience. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 221–234. doi:10.1111/1468-5884.00227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, A. W. (2000). An early glimpse: Service learning from an adolescent perspective. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 115–135. doi:10.4219/jsge-2000-624
   Google Scholar
• Tirri, K. (2003). The moral concerns and orientations of sixth- and ninth-grade students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 93–108. doi:10.1076/edre.9.1.93.13545
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 342–353. doi:10.1177/001698620504900407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assendelft, L. (2008). “City council meetings are cool”: Increasing student civic engagement through service learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 4, 86–97. doi:10.1080/15512160701816150
   Google Scholar
• Volk, V. (2006). Expanding horizons—Into the future with confidence! Roeper Review, 28, 175–178. doi:10.1080/02783190609554357
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Youth United for Change. (2011, April). Youth action research: A foundation for organizing youth united for change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Parker, J., Eberhardt, J., & Passalacqua, S. (2011). “What’s so terrible about swallowing an apple seed?” Problem-based learning in kindergarten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 468–481. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9309-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar