Unwrapping Gifts: Understanding the Inner Workings of Giftedness Through a Panoply of Paradigms in the Field of Psychology

References

• Abdulla, A. M., Paek, S. H., Cramond, B., & Runco, M. A. (2020). Problem finding and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, A. (1925). The practice and theory of individual psychology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Al Taher, R. (2021, July 5). The 5 founding fathers and a history of positive psychology. https://positivepsychology.com/founding-fathers/
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2012). How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher level thinking. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2012). Confronting dogmatism in gifted education. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ansbacher, H. L., & Ansbacher, R. R. (Eds.). (1956). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler: A systematic presentation in selections from his writings. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Arlin, P. K. (1975). A cognitive process model of problem finding. Educational Horizons, 54, 99–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42926034
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, M. E., & Polson, P. G. (1976). A process model for water jug problems. Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbey, A. K., Karama, S., & Haier, R. J. (Eds.). (2021). Cambridge handbook of intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children ( E. S. Kite, Trans.). Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenthal, A. C. (1962). English 2600. Harcourt, Brace, & World.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35, 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Boring, E. G., Bridgman, P. W., Feigl, H., Israel, H. E., Pratt, C. C., & Skinner, B. F. (1945). Symposium on operationism. Psychological Review, 52(5), 241–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgman, P. W. (1938). Operational analysis. Philosophy of Science, 5(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1086/286496
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, A. N., & Skinner, B. F. (1959). A review of Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornejo-Araya, C. A., & Kronborg, L. (2021). Inspirational teachers’ model: A constructivist grounded theory study in gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(3), 300–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211023595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2018). A history of giftedness: Paradigms and paradoxes. In S. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and gifted education: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (2nd ed., pp. 1–14). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, A. M., Sutton, B. P., Hillman, C. H., Kramer, A. F., Cohen, N. J., & Barbey, A. K. (2020). Individual differences in the neurobiology of fluid intelligence predict responsiveness to training: Evidence from a comprehensive cognitive, mindfulness meditation, and aerobic exercise intervention. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 18, 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.100123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., & Starr, J. M. (2009). A lifetime of intelligence: Follow-up studies of the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2010). Democracy and education. IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsen, V. J., & Engle, R. W. (2020). Cognitive approaches to intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 104–138). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2017). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Eamon Dolan/Mariner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. (1993). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. (1994). Identity and the lifecyle. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against method (4th ed.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (2012). Are we getting smarter? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235679
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (2016). Does your family make you smarter? Nature, nurture, and human autonomy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316576694
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1964). Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood. Norton. (Original work published in 1910).
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1961). Escape from freedom. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2020). Differentiating giftedness from talent. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (rev ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2002). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2005). The neurological basis of intelligence: Implications for education. Gifted and Talented, 9(1), 8. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/156074.htm
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G. (2009). Neuropsychological characteristics of academic and creative giftedness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 261–273). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geake, J. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2005). A neuro-psychological model of the creative intelligence of gifted children. Gifted & Talented International, 20(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2005.11673052
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Desmet, O. A., Karami, S., Lee, H., Green, C., Cress, S., Chowkase, A., & Gray, A. (2021). Gifted education’s legacy of high stakes ability testing: Using measures for identification that perpetuate inequity. Roeper Review, 43(4), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1–2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, C., Göbel, S. M., & Inglis, M. (2018). An introduction to mathematical cognition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & Weisberg, R. W. (1966). Verbal behavior and problem solving: Some effects of labeling in a functional fixedness problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goriounova, N. A., & Mansvelder, H. D. (2019, February 15). Genes, cells, and brain areas of intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00044
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graffam, B. (2003). Constructivism and understanding: Implementing the teaching for understanding framework. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2003-439
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology’s ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, E. R. (1946). Psychological facts and psychological theory. Psychological Bulletin, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haier, R. J. (2020). Biological approaches to intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 139–173). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haier, R. J., & Jung, R. E. (2007). Beautiful minds (i.e., brains) and the neural basis of intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. Z., Campitelli, G., & Macnamara, B. N. (Eds.). (2017). The science of expertise: Behavioral, neural, and genetic approaches to complex skill. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J. (2020). Practical intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 736–755). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, S. J. (2020). Cultural psychology (4th ed.). W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, J. (1973). The psychology of C. G. Jung. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2019). Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B. (2021). Transcend: The new science of self-actualization. Tarcher-Perigree.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2020). Social intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 756–779). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, H. H. (2018). Progress & anomaly: A short introduction and discussion of Thomas S. Kuhn’s philosophy of science. Koch Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic exploration in art. International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kubie, L. S. (1958). The neurotic distortion of the creative process. University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. J. (1986). The seasons of a man’s life. Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. J. (1997). The seasons of a woman’s life. Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I., Besançon, M., & Barbot, B. (2011). EPoC: Évaluation du potentiel créatif des enfants (Evaluation of the creative potential of children). Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Maddocks, D. L. S. (2018). The identification of students who are gifted and have a learning disability: A comparison of different diagnostic criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862177520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (2014). Toward a psychology of being. Sublime Books.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 6(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
   Google Scholar
• Meeker, M. N. (1969). Understanding the evaluation of gifted: A new method. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 13(4), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626901300402
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (2009). Obedience to authority. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Mrazik, M., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2010). The neurobiological foundations of giftedness. Roeper Review, 32(4), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.508154
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, R. (1969). A revision of the psychoanalytic theory of the primary process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50(2), 155–178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4948274/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association/Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, S. N., & McCann, M. (Eds.). (2007). Conceptions of giftedness: Sociocultural perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, G. A. (2019). The politics of paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, and the Cold War struggle for men’s minds. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Koehler, J., & Fogarty, E. (2006). Operation Houndstooth intervention theory: Social capital in today’s schools. Gifted Child Today, 29(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2006-189
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Sir K., & Aronica, L. (2016). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that is transforming schools. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1995). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Mariner.
   Google Scholar
• Roid, G. (2003). Stanford–Binet intelligence scales (5th ed.). Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group. (1987). Parallel distributed processing: Vol. 1: Foundations. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, A.-L., & Rey-Mermet, A. (2019). Does process overlap theory replace the issues of general intelligence with the issues of attentional control? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(3), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science Research Associates. (1947, 1962). SRA primary mental abilities. SRA.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A visionary understanding of happiness and well-being. Atria Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, B. M. (1986). Cognition and giftedness: New research directions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628603000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, B. M. (2021). Context matters in gifted education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080424
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1976). About behaviorism. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (2005). Walden two. Hackett Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (2006). The behavior of organisms. Copley Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol, L., & Fox, M. (2019). The comprehensive clinician’s guide to cognitive behavioral therapy. PESI Publishing and Media.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, J. (2014). The new behaviorism (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H. H., & Carr, M. (2003). Cognitive development in gifted children: Toward a more precise understanding of emerging differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 15(3), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024636317011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628102500208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Nonentrenchment in the assessment of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628202600204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1995). In search of the human mind. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Cultural concepts of giftedness. Roeper Review, 29(3), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554404
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020a). The augmented theory of successful intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 679–708). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020b). Cultural approaches to intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 174–201). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020c). Culture and intelligence. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.585
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020d). Systems approaches to intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 202–224). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020e). Transformational giftedness. In T. L. Cross & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development (pp. 203–234). Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020f). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive intelligence: Surviving and thriving in a world of uncertainty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2022a). The emperor has no clothes: The naked truth about the construct validity of traditional methods of gifted identification. Roeper Review, 44(4), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2115179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2022b). Toxic giftedness. Roeper Review, 45(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2148311
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Ambrose, D. (Eds.). (2021). Conceptions of giftedness and talent. Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., & Karami, S. (Eds.). (2022). Transformational giftedness. Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Chowkase, A., Desmet, O., Karami, S., Landy, J., & Lu, J. (2021). Beyond transformational giftedness. Educational Sciences, 11(5), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1983). Insight in the gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529261
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1985). Cognitive development in the gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: A developmental perspective (pp. 37–74). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Desmet, O. A., Ford, D., Gentry, M. L., Grantham, T., & Karami, S. (2021). The legacy: Coming to terms with the origins and development of the gifted-child movement. Roeper Review, 43(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29(5), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00065-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Todhunter, R. J. E., Litvak, A., & Sternberg, K. (2020). The relation of scientific creativity and evaluation of scientific impact to scientific reasoning and general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelligence scale. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titchener, E. B. (2019). An outline of psychology. Wentworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-Technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-Technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O. (2019). Neuroscience of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 148–172). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J. (2013). Investigating America’s elite: Cognitive ability, education, and sex differences. Intelligence, 41(4), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, G. L. (2008). Neuropsychological studies of savant skills: Can they inform the neuroscience of giftedness? Roeper Review, 30(4), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190802363901
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1975). Intelligence defined and undefined: A relativistic appraisal. American Psychologist, 30(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC–V). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wundt, W. M. (2018). An introduction to psychology. Franklin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. (1983). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (Vol. 5, pp. 241–252). Pergamon.
   Google Scholar