Combating Myside Bias in Scientific Thinking: A Special Challenge for the Gifted

References

• Aczel, B. (2019). Low levels of wisdom: Foolishness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 483–499). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvino, J., & Wieler, J. (1979). How standardized testing fails to identify the gifted and what teachers can do about it. Phi Delta Kappan, 61(2), 106–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20299663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (2007). Thinking and deciding (4th Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, M., Exposito-Casas, E., Lopez-Martin, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (2005). Family environment and talent development of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bono, R. (1999). Six thinking hats. Back Bay Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., & Starr, J. M. (2009). A lifetime of intelligence: Follow-up studies of the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, R. M. (1995). Social Darwinism, scientific racism, and the metaphysics of race. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967206
   Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., Mevarech, Z. R., & Baker, D. R. (Eds). (2018). Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fancher, R. E. (1987). The intelligence men: Makers of the I.Q. controversy. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (1950/2012). Requiem for a nun. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M., & Weststrate, N. (Eds.). (2013). The scientific study of personal wisdom: From contemplative traditions to neuroscience. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (Rev Ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Desmet, O. A., Karami, S., Lee, H., Green, C., Cress, A., Chowkase, A., & Gray, A. (2021). Gifted education’s legacy of high stakes ability testing: Using measures for identification that perpetuate inequality. Roeper Review, 43(4), 242–255. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967545
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J. (2019). Practical intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 736–755). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. (1931). The phenomenology of the mind ( J. D. Baillie, Trans.; 2nd Ed.). Allen & Unwin. ( J. D. Baillie, Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. (1945a). Studies in the logic of confirmation (I). Mind, 54(213), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIV.213.1
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. (1945b). Studies in the logic of confirmation (II). Mind, 54(214), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIV.214.97
   Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1748/1993). An enquiry concerning human understanding (2nd Ed.). Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science, 24(5), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendi, I. X. (2017). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Bold Type Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (2020). Social intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 756–779). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D. (2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morriswood, B. (2019, June 5). The 9 types of peer reviewer. Total Internal Reflection. https://totalinternalreflectionblog.com/2019/06/05/the-nine-types-of-peer-reviewer/
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1984). Teaching critical thinking in the “strong” sense: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic, 4(2), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v4i2.2766
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). Critical thinking (2nd Ed.). The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W. (1984). Critical thinking: Fundamental for education in a free society. Educational Leadership, 42, 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W. (1985). Dialectical reasoning. Developing minds. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching (pp. 152–160). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W. (1987). Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 127–148). W. H. Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J. (2021). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, S. E., Handley-Miner, I. J., Mayer, J. D., & Caruso, D. R. (2020). Emotional intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 709–735). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schooler, J. W. (2014). Metascience could rescue the ‘replication crisis.’ Nature, 515(7525), 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/515009a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2021). The bias that divides us: The science and politics of myside thinking. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudinger, U. M. (2019). The distinction between personal and general wisdom: How far have we come? In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 182–201). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.010
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Teaching scientific thinking to gifted children. Roeper Review, 4(4), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198209552618
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Smart people are not stupid, but they sure can be foolish: The imbalance theory of foolishness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 232–242). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9(3), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.3.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Personal wisdom in the balance. In M. Ferrari & N. Weststrate (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom: From contemplative traditions to neuroscience (pp. 53–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in human development. Research in Human Development, 15(3–4), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1491216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive intelligence: Surviving and thriving in a world of uncertainty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2022). The emperor has no clothes: The naked truth about the construct validity of traditional methods of gifted identification. Roeper Review, 44(4), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2115179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Ambrose, D. (Eds). (2021). Conceptions of giftedness and talent. Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., & Karami, S. (Eds). (2022). Palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education. Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Desmet, O. A., Ford, D., Gentry, M. L., Grantham, T., & Karami, S. (2021). The legacy: Coming to terms with the origins and development of the gifted-child movement. Roeper Review, 43(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Ehsan, H., & Ghahremani, M. (2022). Levels of teaching science to gifted children. Roeper Review, 44(4), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2115178
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Hedlund, J. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology. Human Performance, 15(1/2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1501&02_09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning for graduate admissions in psychology and related disciplines. Journal of Intelligence, 5(3), 29. http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/3/29/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Sternberg, K., & Todhunter, R. J. E. (2017). Measuring reasoning about teaching for graduate admissions in psychology and related disciplines. Journal of Intelligence, 5(4), 34. http://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/4/34/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Todhunter, R. J. E., Litvak, A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). The relation of scientific creativity and evaluation of scientific impact to scientific reasoning and general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Wong, C. H., & Sternberg, K. (2019). The relation of tests of scientific reasoning to each other and to tests of fluid intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7030020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Arnold, K. D. (2003). Beyond Bloom: Revisiting environmental factors that enhance or impede talent development. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 227–238). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Oslzewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2021). The talent development megamodel: A domain-specific conceptual framework based on the psychology of high performance. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 425–442). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence scale. Houghton Mifflin. https://doi.org/10.1037/10014-000
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, B. J., & Christopherson, C. D. (2019). The replication crisis in psychology: An overview for theoretical and philosophical psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(4), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Conyers, M. (2016). Teaching students to drive their brains: Metacognitive strategies, activities, and lesson ideas. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, E. (2018). Psychology’s replication crisis is running out of excuses. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/psychologys-replication-crisis-real/576223
   Google Scholar