Evolving Implicit Metaphors for Understanding Giftedness: From Banks to Foundations

References

• Albright, M. (2018). Fascism: A warning. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (1996). Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(96)00019-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (1998). Comprehensiveness of conceptual foundations for gifted education: A root-metaphorical analysis. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(4), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329802100406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2000-570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Hydraulic model. APA Dictionary of Psychology https://dictionary.apa.org/hydraulic-model
   Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016, December 15). Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/
   Google Scholar
• Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children ( E. S. Kite, Trans). Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence … A biological treatise on intellectual development (Expanded ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chowkase, A. A. (2022, January 4). Three C’s conception of giftedness: A call for paradigm shift. Gifted Education International, 38 (3), 404–411. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02614294211064703
   Google Scholar
• Chowkase, A. A., & Watve, S. (2021). From I to we: The three C’s conception of gifted education. In R. J. Sternberg, D. Ambrose, & S. Karami (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education (pp. 61–85). Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211064703
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, T. [@TedCruz]. (2021, November 6). Government propaganda … .for your 5 year old. [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1457108504498642953?lang=enz
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y. (2021). Evolving complexity theory: A developmental systems approach to giftedness and talent. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 99–121). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson Institute. (2021). What is giftedness? https://www.davidsongifted.org/gifted-blog/what-is-giftedness/
   Google Scholar
• Delisle, J. R., Reis, S. M., & Gubbins, E. J. (1981). The revolving door identification and programming model. Exceptional Children, 48(2), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298104800209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C., & Yeager, D. (2020). A growth mindset about intelligence. In G. Walton & A. J. Crum (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change (pp. 9–35). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). A conception of talent and talent development. In R. C. Friedman & K. B. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness (pp. 193–209). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10297-010
   Google Scholar
• Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98–119). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (Expanded ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Desmet, O. A., Karami, S., Lee, H., Green, C., Cress, A., Chowkase, A., & Gray, A. (2021). Gifted education’s legacy of high stakes ability testing: Using measures for identification that perpetuate inequality. Roeper Review, 43(4), 242–255. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967545
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A. (2016, December 16). How bad is internet censorship in your country? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/12/freedom-on-the-net-2016-where-are-social-media-users-under-pressure/
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., Mönks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.). (2000). International handbook of giftedness and talent. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C. (2020). Intelligence in adulthood. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 181–204). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. World Book.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, D., & Ziblatt, S. (2018). How democracies die. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–181). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meacham, M. (2017, August 4). Why the brain is still a “black box” and what to do about it. Association for Talent Development. https://www.td.org/insights/why-the-brain-is-still-a-black-box-and-what-to-do-about-it
   Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how we can save it. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, E. (n.d.). The five levels of giftedness. https://eleanormunsonphd.com/2011/01/the-five-levels-of-giftedness/
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J. (2021). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. (2018). (Ed.). Handbook of giftedness and gifted education: Psychoeducational theory research, and best practices. Springer
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Rinn, A., & Makel, M. C. (Eds.). (2017). From giftedness to gifted education. Prufrock.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, J. (2022). Unthinkable: Trauma, truth, and the trials of American democracy. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Read, M. (2018, December 26). How much of the Internet is fake? Turns out, a lot of it, actually. New York Magazine. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/how-much-of-the-internet-is-fake.html
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1981, January). The revolving-door model: A new way of identifying the gifted. Phi Delta Kappan, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph-Renzulli/publication/234596861_The_Revolving-Door_Model_A_New_Way_of_Identifying_the_Gifted/links/5b19766caca272021cef08b0/The-Revolving-Door-Model-A-New-Way-of-Identifying-the-Gifted.pdf?origin=publication_detail
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S., Eckert, R. D., & Little, C. A. (Eds.). (2009). Systems & models for developing gifted programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed.). Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2021). The three ring conception of giftedness: A change in direction from being gifted to the development of gifted behaviors. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 335–356). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. Dodd.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., Shewach, O. R., & Dahlke, J. A. (2020). The predictive value of general intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 381–414). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(3), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628102500208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020a). Rethinking what we mean by intelligence. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(3), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720970700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020b). Transformational giftedness. In T. L. Cross & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development (pp. 203–234). Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020c). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021a). Adaptive intelligence: Intelligence is not a personal trait but rather a person x task x situation interaction. Journal of Intelligence, 9(4), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9040058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021b). A new model of giftedness emphasizing active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership that can make a positive, meaningful, and potentially enduring difference to the world. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 407–424). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2022). The vexing problem of dark giftedness. Gifted Education International. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221110459
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2023). Toxic giftedness. Roeper Review, 45(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2148311
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Ambrose, D. (Eds.). (2021). Conceptions of giftedness and talent. Palgrave–Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., & Karami, S. (Eds.). (2022). Palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education. Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Chowkase, A., Desmet, O., Karami, S., Landy, J., & Lu, J. (2021). Beyond transformational giftedness. Educational Sciences, 11(5), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Desmet, O. A., Ford, D., Gentry, M. L., Grantham, T., & Karami, S. (2021). The legacy: Coming to terms with the origins and development of the gifted-child movement. Roeper Review, 43(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2021). The talent development megamodel: A domain-specific conceptual framework based on the psychology of high performance. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 425–442). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2022). Channeling gifted abilities into transformative creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg, D. Ambrose, & S. Karami (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education (pp. 373–386). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. In Genetic Studies of Genius (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). Beyond g: Putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. Intelligence, 34(5), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Stumm, S., & Plomin, R. (2015). Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy through adolescence. Intelligence, 48, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2023, April 26). WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411–437). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar