A Real-Time Fast-Flow Tube Study of VOC and Particulate Emissions from Electronic, Potentially Reduced-Harm, Conventional, and Reference Cigarettes

REFERENCES

• Adam, T., McAughey, J., Mocker, C., McGrath, C., and Zimmerman, R. (2009). Simultaneous On-Line Size and Chemical Analysis of Gas Phase and Particulate Phase of Cigarette Mainstream Smoke. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 394:1193–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, T., McAughey, J., Mocker, C., McGrath, C., and Zimmerman, R. (2010). Influence of Filter Ventilation on the Chemical Composition of Cigarette Mainstream Smoke. Anal. Chim. Acta., 657:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman, S. L., and Ingebrethsen, B. J. (2011). Characterization of Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Particle Size Distributions from Commercial Cigarettes Using a DMS500 Fast Particulate Spectrometer and Smoking Cycle Simulator. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45:1409–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. R. (2006). Smoke Generation Inside a Burning Cigarette: Modifying Combustion to Develop Cigarettes That May be Less Hazardous to Health. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 32:373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar, R. Z., Hua, M., and Talbot, P. (2015). Puffing Topography and Nicotine Intake of Electronic Cigarette Users. PLoS One., 10:e0117222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. M. (2004). A Review of the Influence of Particle Size, Puff Volume, and Inhalation Pattern on the Deposition of Cigarette Smoke Particles in the Respiratory Tract. Inhalation Toxicol., 16:675–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertholon, J. F., Becquemin, M. H., Roy, M., Roy, F., Ledur, D., Annesi, M. I., and Dautzenberg, B. (2013). Comparison of the Aerosol Produced by Electronic Cigarettes with Conventional Cigarettes and the Shisha. Rev. Mal. Respir., 30:752–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. J., and Cheng, J. M. (2014). Electronic Cigarettes: Product Characterisation and Design Considerations. Tob. Control., 23(Suppl 2):ii4–ii10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhr, K., van Ruth, S., and Delahunty, C. (2002). Analysis of Volatile Flavor Compounds by Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry: Fragmentation Patterns and Discrimination between Isobaric and Isomeric Compounds. Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 221:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman Carroll, S. L., and Wu, L.-T. (2014). E-Cigarette Prevalence and Correlates of Use among Adolescents Versus Adults: A Review and Comparison. J. Psychiatr. Res., 54:43–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. X., and Moldoveanu, S. C. (2003). Mainstream Smoke Chemical Analyses for 2R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarette. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int., 20:448–458.
   Google Scholar
• de Gouw, J., Warneke, C., Karl, T., Eerdekens, G., van der Veen, C., and Fall, R. (2003). Sensitivity and Specificity of Atmospheric Trace Gas Detection by Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 223–224:365–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschner, M. S., Selmani, I., Groger, T. M., and Zimmermann, R. (2011). Online Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Characterization of Puff-by-Puff Resolved Cigarette Smoke by Hyphenation of Fast Gas Chromatography to Single-Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry: Quantification of Hazardous Volatile Organic Compounds. Anal. Chem., 83:6619–6627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. E., and Hoffman, A. C. (2014). Electronic Cigarettes: Abuse Liability, Topography and Subjective Effects. Tob. Control., 23(Suppl 2):ii23–ii29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. (1998). Tar, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide of the Smoke of 1294 Varieties of Domestic Cigarettes for the Year 1998. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fujioka, K., and Shibamoto, T. (2006). Determination of Toxic Carbonyl Compounds in Cigarette Smoke. Environ. Toxicol., 21:47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuoco, F. C., Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., and Vigo, P. (2014). Influential Parameters on Particle Concentration and Size Distribution in the Mainstream of e-Cigarettes. Environ. Pollut., 184:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiss, O., Bianchi, I., Barahona, F., and Barrero-Moreno, J. (2015). Characterisation of Mainstream and Passive Vapours Emitted by Selected Electronic Cigarettes. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health., 218:169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goniewicz, M. L., Knysak, J., Gawron, M., Kosmider, L., Sobczak, A., Kurek, J., Prokopowicz, A., Jablonska-Czapla, M., Rosik-Dulewska, C., Havel, C., Jacob, P., 3rd, and Benowitz, N. (2014). Levels of Selected Carcinogens and Toxicants in Vapour from Electronic Cigarettes. Tob. Control., 23:133–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2014). Government Laboratory Tar and Nicotine Report. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://www.govtlab.gov.hk/english/pub_tnrpt.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Grana, R., Benowitz, N., and Glantz, S. A. (2014). E-Cigarettes: A Scientific Review. Circulation, 129:1972–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, E., Hill, C., Hollywood, M., Kearny, M., McAdam, K., McLaughlin, D., Purkis, S., and Williams, M. (2004). The UK Smoke Constituents Testing Study. Summary of Results and Comparison with Other Studies. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int., 21:117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Harward, C. N., Thweatt, W. D., Baren, R. E., and Parrish, M. E. (2006). Determination of Molecular Line Parameters for Acrolein (C3H4O) Using Infrared Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A., 63A:970–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzinikolaou, D. G., Lagesson, V., Stavridou, A. J., Pouli, A. E., Lagesson-Andrasko, L., and Stavrides, J. C. (2006). Analysis of the Gas Phase of Cigarette Smoke by Gas Chromatography Coupled with UV-Diode Array Detection. Anal. Chem., 78:4509–4516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, D., Hoffmann, I., and El-Bayoumy, K. (2001). The Less Harmful Cigarette: A Controversial Issue. A Tribute to Ernst L. Wynder. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 14:767–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingebrethsen, B. J., Cole, S. K., and Alderman, S. L. (2012). Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Particle Size Distribution Measurements. Inhal. Toxicol., 24:976–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intorp, M., Purkis, S., and Wagstaff, W. (2012). Determination of Carbonyl Compounds in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke. The CORESTA 2010 Collaborative Study and Recommended Method. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int., 25:361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Olfert, J. S., Cabot, R., Treacy, C., Yurteri, C. U., Dickens, C., McAughey, J., and Symonds, J. P. R. (2014). Steady-State Measurement of the Effective Particle Density of Cigarette Smoke. J. Aerosol Sci., 75:9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, D. B., Asgharian, B., Price, O. T., Rostami, A., and Oldham, M. J. (2010). Effect of Smoking Parameters on the Particle Size Distribution and Predicted Airway Deposition of Mainstream Cigarette Smoke. Inhal. Toxicol., 22:199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmider, L., Sobczak, A., Fik, M., Knysak, J., Zaciera, M., Kurek, J., and Goniewicz, M. L. (2014). Carbonyl Compounds in Electronic Cigarette Vapors: Effects of Nicotine Solvent and Battery Output Voltage. Nicotine Tob. Res., 16:1319–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Feng, S., van Heemst, J., and McAdam, K. G. (2010). New Insights into the Formation of Volatile Compounds in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 396:1817–1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manigrasso, M., Buonanno, G., Fuoco, F. C., Stabile, L., and Avino, P. (2015). Aerosol Deposition Doses in the Human Respiratory Tree of Electronic Cigarette Smokers. Environ. Pollut., 196:257–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsunaga, A., and Ziemann, P. (2010). Gas-Wall Partitioning of Organic Compounds in a Teflon Film Chamber and Potential Effects on Reaction Product and Aerosol Yield Measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44:881–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta, K., Uchiyama, S., Inaba, Y., Nakagome, H., and Kunugita, N. (2011). Determination of Carbonyl Compounds Generated from the Electronic Cigarette Using Coupled Silica Cartridges Impregnated with Hydroquinone and 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine. Bunseki Kagaku, 60:791–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankow, J. F., Watanabe, K. H., Toccalino, P. L., Luo, W., and Austin, D. F. (2007). Calculated Cancer Risks for Conventional and Potentially Reduced Exposure Product Cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev., 16:584–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papousek, R., Pataj, Z., Novakova, P., Lemr, K., and Bartak, P. (2014). Determination of Acrylamide and Acrolein in Smoke from Tobacco and E-Cigarettes. Chromatographia, 77:1145–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, J. L., O'Connor, R. J., Paszkiewicz, G. M., Cummings, K. M., Djordjevic, M. V., and Shields, P. G. (2009). Cigarette Filter-Based Assays as Proxies for Toxicant Exposure and Smoking Behavior: A Literature Review. Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev., 18:3321–3333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petraru, C., Balalau, D., Ilie, M., and Balalau, C. (2013). Evaluation of Different Kind of Cigarette Filters' Ability to Retain the Toxic Compounds of the Vapor Phase. A Comparative Graphical Study. Farmacia (Bucharest, Rom.), 61:736–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piade, J. J., Wajrock, S., Jaccard, G., and Janeke, G. (2013). Formation of Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Constituents Prioritized by the World Health Organization: Yield Patterns Observed in Market Surveys, Clustering and Inverse Correlations. Food Chem. Toxicol., 55:329–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkis, W., Mueller, C., Intorp, M., and Seidel, H. (2014). The Influence of Cigarette Designs and Smoking Regimes on Vapour Phase Yields. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung/Contribut. Tobacco Res., 24:33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgman, A., and Perfetti, T. A. (2009). The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 249–250.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, E., Schramke, H., Weiler, H., Buettner, A., Kausche, S., Weber, S., Berges, A., Stueber, M., Muench, M., Trelles-Sticken, E., Pype, J., Kohlgrueber, K., Voelkel, H., and Wittke, S. (2012). Mainstream Smoke Chemistry and In Vitro and In Vivo Toxicity of the Reference Cigarettes 3R4F and 2R4F. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int., 25:316–335.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, M. M., Chambers, D. M., Pazo, D. Y., Moliere, F., Blount, B. C., and Watson, C. H. (2014). Simultaneous Analysis of 22 Volatile Organic Compounds in Cigarette Smoke Using Gas Sampling Bags for High-Throughput Solid-Phase Microextraction. Anal. Chem., 86:7088–7095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schripp, T., Markewitz, D., Uhde, E., and Salthammer, T. (2013). Does E-Cigarette Consumption Cause Passive Vaping? Indoor Air., 23:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staimer, N., Nguyen, T. B., Nizkorodov, S. A., and Delfino, R. J. (2012). Glutathione Peroxidase Inhibitory Assay for Electrophilic Pollutants in Diesel Exhaust and Tobacco Smoke. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 403:431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takanami, Y., Chida, M., Hasebe, H., Sone, Y., and Suhara, S. (2003). Analysis of Cigarette Smoke by an Online Thermal Desorption System and Multidimensional GC-MS. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 41:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talih, S., Balhas, Z., El, H. A., and Baalbaki, R. (2015). Effects of User Puff Topography, Device Voltage, and Liquid Nicotine Concentration on Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Yield: Measurements and Model Predictions. Nicotine Tob. Res., 17:150–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, G.-B., Gao, W., Huang, Z.-X., Hong, Y., Fu, Z., Dong, J.-G., Cheng, P., and Zhou, Z. (2011). Vacuum Ultraviolet Single Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer. Fenxi Huaxue, 39:1470–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayyarah, R., and Long, G. A. (2014). Comparison of Select Analytes in Aerosol from E-Cigarettes with Smoke from Conventional Cigarettes and with Ambient Air. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 70:704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thweatt, W. D., Harward, C. N., and Parrish, M. E. (2007). Measurement of Acrolein and 1,3-Butadiene in a Single Puff of Cigarette Smoke Using Lead-Salt Tunable Diode Laser Infrared Spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 67A:16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P. A., Brown, J. E., Karpinski, C. D., Luo, W., and Pankow, J. F. (2015). Flavour Chemicals in Electronic Cigarette Fluids. Tob. Control., doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TJI Report. (2013). Reference Products Used in Tobacco and Smoke Analysis. Health Sci. Aff.: Tob. J. Int., 2:150–154. Retrieved from http://www2.ca.uky.edu/refcig/Reference%20and%20monitor%20products.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uchiyama, S., Inaba, Y., and Kunugita, N. (2010). Determination of Acrolein and Other Carbonyls in Cigarette Smoke Using Coupled Silica Cartridges Impregnated with Hydroquinone and 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine. J. Chromatogr. A., 1217:4383–4388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchiyama, S., Tomizawa, T., Inaba, Y., and Kunugita, N. (2013). Simultaneous Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds and Carbonyls in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Using a Sorbent Cartridge Followed by Two-Step Elution. J. Chromatogr. A, 1314:31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Kentucky. (2013). Reference Cigarette Program. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from http://www2.ca.uky.edu/refcig/.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). The Health Consequences of Smoking–50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, W. D., Cremers, R., Klerx, W., Schermer, T. R. J., and Scheepers, P. T. J. (2012). Application of Cigarette Smoke Characterisation Based on Optical Aerosol Spectrometry. Dynamics and Comparisons with Tar Values. Curr. Anal. Chem., 8:344–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Villarreal, A., Bozhilov, K., Lin, S., and Talbot, P. (2013). Metal and Silicate Particles Including Nanoparticles are Present in Electronic Cigarette Cartomizer Fluid and Aerosol. PLoS One., 8:e57987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Sumner, W., and Chen, D.-R. (2013). In Vitro Particle Size Distributions in Electronic and Conventional Cigarette Aerosols Suggest Comparable Deposition Patterns. Nicotine Tob. Res., 15:501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar