Design and Performance Test of a Lab-Made Single-Stage Low-Pressure Impactor for Morphology Analysis of Diesel Exhaust Particles

REFERENCES

• Arffman, A., Marjamaki, M. and Keskinen, J. (2011). Simulation of Low Pressure Impactor Collection Efficiency Curves. J. Aerosol Sci., 42:329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbach, C., Kaminski, H., Fissan, H., Monz, C., Dahmann, D., Mülhopt, S., Paur, H. R., Kiesling, H. J., Herrmann, F., Voetz, M., and Kuhlbusch, T. (2009). Comparison of Four Mobility Particle Sizers with Different Time Resolutino for Stationary Exposure Measurements. J. Nanopart. Res., 11:1593–1609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtscher, H. (2005). Physical Characterization of Particulate Emissions from Diesel Engines: A Review. J. Aerosol Sci., 36:896–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demokritou, P., Lee, S. J. and Koutrakis, P. (2004). Development and Evaluation of a High Loading PM2.5 Speciation Sampler. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38:111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulak, Y., Jayjock, E., Muzzio, F., Bauer, A. and McGlynn, P. (2009). Numerical Calibration of the Andersen Cascade Impactor using a Single Jet Model. Int. J. Pharm., 377:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillamo, R. E., and Kauppinen, E. I. (1991). On the Performance of the Berner Low Pressure Impactor. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 14:33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W. C. (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-H., and Tsai, C.-J. (2001). Effect of Gravity on Particle Collection Efficiency of Inertial Impactors. Journal of Aerosol Sci., 32:375–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-H., and Tsai, C.-J. (2002). Influence of Impaction Plate Diameter and Particle Density on the Collection Efficiency of Round-Nozzle Inertial Impactors. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 36:714–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hueglin, C., Scherrer, L., and Burtscher, H. (1997). An Accurate, Continuously Adjustable Dilution System (1:10 to 1:104) for Submicron Aerosols. J. Aerosol Sci., 28:1049–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, W. P. and McMurry, P. H. (1992). Measurement of Particle Density by Inertial Classification of Differential Mobility Analyzer-Generated Monodisperse Aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 17:199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittelson, D. B., Watts, W. F., and Johnson, J. P. (2006). On-Road and Laboratory Evaluation of Combustion Aerosols—Part 1: Summary of Diesel Engine Results. J. Aerosol Sci., 37:913–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leduc, S., Fredriksson, C., and Hermansson, R. (2006). Particle-Tracking Option in Fluent Validated by Simulation of a Low-Pressure Impactor. Adv. Powder Technol., 17:99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, Q. G. J., Nakao, S., Qi, L., Austin, R., Stothers, C., Hagino, H., and Cocker, D. R. (2009). Real-Time Aerosol Density Determination Utilizing a Modified Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer-Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer System. Aero. Sci. Tech., 43:673–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricq, M. M., Podsiadlik, D. H., and Chase, R. E. (2000). Size Distributions of Motor Vehicle Exhaust PM: A Comparison Between ELPI and SMPS Measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 33:239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricq, M. M. and Xu, N. (2004). The Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Soot Particles from Premixed Flames and Motor Vehicle Exhaust. J. Aerosol Sci., 35:1251–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurry, P. H., Wang, X., Park, K. and Ehara, K. (2002). The Relationship Between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 36:227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. C., Brown, D. B., and Smurthwaite, M. (1998). New Concept for the Variable Flow Rate Andersen Cascade Impactor and Calibration Data. J. Aerosol Med., 11:S133–S138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olfert, J. S., Symonds, J. P. R., and Collings, N. (2007). The Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Particles Emitted from a Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle with a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst. J. Aerosol Sci., 38:69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H. (2003). Relationship Between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., Kittelson, D., and McMurry, P. (2004). Structural Properties of Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38:881–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, R. H., and Green, D. (1999). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 6th ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, O., Karg, E., Hagen, D. E., Whitefield, P. D., and Ferron, G. A. (2007). On the Effective Density of Non-Spherical Particles as Derived from Combined Measurements of Aerodynamic and Mobility Equivalent Size. J. Aerosol Sci., 38:431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srichana, T., Martin, G. P., and Marriott, C. (1998). Calibration Method for the Andersen Cascade Impactor. J. Aerosol Sci., 29:S761–S762.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, F. and Olfert, J. S. (2014). Determination of Particle Mass, Effective Density, Mass-Mobility Exponent, and Dynamic Shape Factor using an Aerodynamic Aerosol Classifier and a Differential Mobility Analyzer in Tandem. J. Aerosol Sci., 75:35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gulijk, C., Marijnissen, J. C. M., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J. A., and Schmidt-Ott, A. (2004). Measuring Diesel Soot with a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer and an Electrical Low-Pressure Impactor: Performance Assessment with a Model for Fractal-Like Agglomerates. J. Aerosol Sci., 35:633–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N. P. (1989). The Andersen Impactor: Calibration, Wall Losses and Numerical Simulation. J. Aerosol Sci., 20:67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, A., Ristimäki, J., Marjamäki, M., Vaaraslahti, K., and Keskinen, J. (2002). Effective Density of Diesel Exhaust Particles as a Function of Size. SAE paper, 2002-01-0056.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Brasel, T. L., Krackeo, D., Cheng, Y., Ahuja, A., Norenberg, P. and Kelly, H. W. (2007). Influence of Impactor Operation Flow Rate on Particle Size Distribution of Four Jet Nebulizers. Pharm. Dev. Technol., 12:353–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar