Flow rate-independent electrical aerosol sensor

References

• Brown, D., M. Wilson, W. MacNee, V. Stone, and K. Donaldson. 2001. Size-Dependent Proinflammatory Effects of Ultrafine Polystyrene Particles: A Role for Surface Area and Oxidative Stress in the Enhanced Activity of Ultrafines. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 175 (3):191–9. doi:10.1006/taap.2001.9240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, S. W., S. Y. Hwang, J. Wang, and J. W. Gentry. 1985. Unipolar Charging of Ultrafine Particles by Diffusion of Ions: Theory and Experiment. Langmuir 1 (1):150–8. doi:10.1021/la00061a027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaniyala, S., M. Fierz, J. Keskinen, and M. Marjamäki. 2011. Instruments Based on Electrical Detection of Aerosols. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, ed. P. Kulkarni, P. A. Baron, K. Willeke, 393–413. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fierz, M., C. Houle, P. Steigmeier, and H. Burtscher. 2011. Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 45 (1):1–10. doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.516283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierz, M., D. Meier, P. Steigmeier, and H. Burtscher. 2014. Aerosol Measurement by Induced Currents. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 48 (4):350–7. doi:10.1080/02786826.2013.875981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fissan, H., S. Neumann, A. Trampe, D. Pui, and W. Shin. 2007. Rationale and Principle of an Instrument Measuring Lung Deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area. J. Nanopart. Res. 9:53–9. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9156-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, N. A. 1964. The Mechanics of Aerosols. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, M., J. Cao, and E. Seto. 2015. A Distributed Network of Low-Cost Continuous Reading Sensors to Measure Spatiotemporal Variations of PM2.5 in Xi’an, China. Environ. Pollut. 199:56–65. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstius, D. M., A. Pillarisetti, K. R. Smith, and E. Seto. 2014. Field Calibrations of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor at a Regulatory Monitoring Site in California. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. 7 (1):605–32. doi:10.5194/amt-7-1121-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokinen, V., and J. M. Mäkelä. 1997. Closed-Loop Arrangement with Critical Orifice for DMA Sheath/Excess Flow System. J. Aerosol Sci. 28 (4):643–8. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(96)00457-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, H., T. Kuhlbusch, H. Fissan, L. Ravi, H.-G. Horn, H.-S. Han, R. Caldow, and C. Asbach. 2012. Mathematical Description of Experimentally Determined Charge Distributions of a Unipolar Diffusion Charger. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46 (6):708–16. doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.659360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen, H., J. Kannosto, A. Virtanen, J. M. Mäkelä, M. Kulmala, P. Aalto, and J. Keskinen. 2010. Technical Note: Measuring Condensation Sink and Ion Sink of Atmospheric Aerosols with the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (3):1361–8. doi:10.5194/acp-10-1361-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtimäki, M. 1983. In modified electrical aerosol detector. In Aerosols in the Mining and Industrial Work Environments, ed. V. A. Marple and B. Y. H. Liu, vol. 3, 1135–43. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. Y. H., and K. W. Lee. 1975. An Aerosol Generator of High Stability. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 36 (12):861–5. doi:10.1080/0002889758507357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki, M.,. J. Keskinen, D.-R. Chen, and D. Y. H. Pui. 2000. Performance Evaluation of Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI). J. Aerosol Sci. 31 (2):249–61. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00052-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, J., M. Voetz, and H.-J. Kiesling. 2010. Monitor for Detecting and Assessing Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 12 (1):21–37. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9695-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostedt, A., A. Arffman, K. Janka, J. Yli-Ojanperä, and J. Keskinen. 2014. Characterization and Response Model of the PPS-M Aerosol Sensor. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 48 (10):1022–30. doi:10.1080/02786826.2014.951023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostedt, A., M. Marjamäki, and J. Keskinen. 2009. Modification of the ELPI to Measure Mean Particle Effective Density in Real-Time. J. Aerosol Sci. 40 (9):823–31. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostedt, A., M. Marjamäki, J. Yli-Ojanperä, J. Keskinen, K. Janka, V. Niemelä, and A. Ukkonen. 2009. Non-Collecting Electrical Sensor for Particle Concentration Measurement. AAQR. 9:470–7. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2009.03.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, E. G., T. H. Watkins, P. A. Solomon, E. D. Thoma, R. W. Williams, G. S. W. Hagler, D. Shelow, D. A. Hindin, V. J. Kilaru, and P. W. Preuss. 2013. The Changing Paradigm of Air Pollution Monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (20):11369–77. doi: 10.1021/es4022602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todea, A. M., S. Beckmann, H. Kaminski, and C. Asbach. 2015. Accuracy of Electrical Aerosol Sensors Measuring Lung Deposited Surface Area Concentrations. J. Aerosol Sci. 89:96–109. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, A., M. Marjamäki, J. Ristimäki, and J. Keskinen. 2001. Secondary Particle Collection Mechanisms in ELPI. J. Aerosol Sci. 32:389–401. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(00)90081-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W., J. Stanek, H.-S. Han, T. Johnson, H. Sakurai, D. Pui, J. Turner, D.-R. Chen, and S. Duthie. 2007. Use of the Electrical Aerosol Detector as an Indicator of the Surface Area of fine Particles Deposited in the Lung. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 57 (2):211–20. doi:10.1080/10473289.2007.10465321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yli-Ojanperä, J., J. M. Mäkelä, M. Marjamäki, A. Rostedt, and J. Keskinen. 2010. Towards Traceable Particle Number Concentration Standard: Single Charged Aerosol Reference (SCAR). J. Aerosol Sci. 41 (8):719–28. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar