Deposition efficiency and uniformity of monodisperse solid particle deposition in the Vitrocell® 24/48 Air–Liquid-Interface in vitro exposure system

References

• Adamson, J., D. Thorne, A. Dalrymple, D. Dillon, and C. Meredith. 2013. Assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition within the Vitrocell exposure module using quartz crystal microbalances. Chem. Central J. 7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AeroSolved, Computational Fluid Dynamics Code. 2017. Accessed November 14, 2017. http://www.aerosolved.com.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari, M., F. Lucci, and A. K. Kuczaj. 2019. Multispecies aerosol evolution and deposition in a bent pipe. J. Aerosol Sci. 129:53–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aufderheide, M., W.-D. Heller, O. Krischenowski, N. Mohle, and D. Hochrainer. 2017. Improvement of the cultex® exposure by radial distribution of the test aerosol. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 69(6):359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2017.02.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comouth, A., H. Saathoff, K. H. Naumann, S. Muelhopt, H.-R. Paur, and T. Leisner. 2013. Modelling and measurement of particle deposition for cell exposure at the air-liquid interface. J. Aerosol Sci. 63:103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghobashi, S. 1994. On predicting particle-laden turbulent flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 52(4):309–329. doi: 10.1007/BF00936835.
   Google Scholar
• Frederix, E., A. Kuczaj, M. Nordlund, A. Veldman, and B. Geurts. 2017. Eulerian modeling of inertial and diffusional aerosol deposition in bent pipes. Comput. Fluids 159:217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.09.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujitani, Y., Y. Sugaya, M. Hashiguchi, A. Furuyama, S. Hirano, and A. Takamia. 2015. Particle deposition efficiency at air-liquid interface of a cell exposure chamber. J. Aerosol Sci. 81:90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.10.012.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, S., T. Suzuki, and Y. Nagata. 2016a. Analysis of cigarette smoke deposition within an in vitro exposure system for simulating exposure in the human respiratory tract. Beitr. Zur Tabakforsch. Int. Contrib. Tobacco Res. 27:20–29. doi: 10.1515/cttr-2016-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, S., Y. Kanemaru, H. Nara, K. Erami, and Y. Nagata. 2016b. Assessing the mutagenic activities of smoke from different cigarettes in direct exposure experiments using the modified Ames Salmonella assay. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen 803–804:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, K. M., L. Zeng, Q. Zhou, R. Tran, and J. Yang. 2013. On assessing spatial uniformity of particle distributions in quality control of manufacturing processes. J. Manufact. Syst. 32:154–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2012.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., T. M. Peters, P. T. O'Shaughnessy, A. Adamcakova-Dodd, and P. S. Thorne. 2013. Validation of an in vitro exposure system for toxicity assessment of air-delivered nanomaterials. Toxicol. in Vitro 27:164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.08.030.
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, G., W. Koch, D. Ritter, A. C. Gutleb, S. T. Larsen, T. Loret, F. Zanetti, S. Constant, S. Chortarea, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, P. S. Hiemstra, E. Frejafon, P. Hubert, L. Gribaldo, P. Kearns, J.-M. Aublant, S. Diabaté, C. Weiss, A. de Groot, and I. Kooter. 2018. Air-liquid interface in vitro models for respiratory toxicology research: consensus workshop and recommendations. Appl. Vitro Toxicol. 4(2):91–106. doi: 10.1089/aivt.2017.0034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longest, P. W., and M. J. Oldham. 2006. Mutual enhancements of CFD modeling and experimental data: a case study of micron particle deposition in a branching airway model. Inhalation Toxicol. 18(10):761–771. doi: 10.1080/08958370600748653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucci, F., N. D. Castro, A. A. Rostami, M. J. Oldham, J. Hoeng, Y. B. Pithawalla, and A. K. Kuczaj. 2018. Characterization and modeling of aerosol deposition in Vitrocell® exposure systems – exposure well chamber deposition efficiency. J. Aerosol Sci. 23:141–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.06.015.
   Google Scholar
• Majeed, S., S. Frentzel, S. Wagner, D. Kuehn, P. Leroy, P. A. Guy, A. Knorr, J. Hoeng, and M. C. Peitsch. 2014. Characterization of the Vitrocell® 24/48 in vitro aerosol exposure system using mainstream cigarette smoke. Chem. Central J. 8(1):62. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.04.021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris, J. B. 2012. Biologically-based modeling insights in inhaled vapor absorption and dosimetry. Pharmacol. Therap. 136(3):401–413. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson, L., C. Mankus, D. Thorne, G. Jackson, J. DeBay, and C. Meredith. 2015. Development of an in vitro cytotoxicity model for aerosol exposure using 3D reconstructed human airway tissue; application for assessment of e-cigarette aerosol. Toxicol. Vitro 29(7):1952–1962. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham, M. 2006. Challenges in validating CFD-derived inhaled aerosol deposition predictions. Inhalation Toxicol. 18(10):781–786. doi: 10.1080/08958370600748752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham, M. J., J. Zhang, M. J. Rusyniak, D. B. Kane, and W. P. Gardner. 2018. Particle size distribution of selected electronic nicotine delivery system products. Food Chem. Toxicol. 113:236–240. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.01.045.
   Google Scholar
• OpenFOAM, 2015 OpenFOAM. Accessed September 8, 2015.http://www.openfoam.org.
   Google Scholar
• Paur, H.-R., F. R. Cassee, J. Teeguarden, H. Fissan, S. Diabate, M. Aufderheide, W. G. Kreyling, O. Hanninen, G. Kasper, M. Riediker, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, and O. Schmid. 2011. In-vitro cell exposure studies for the assessment of nanoparticle toxicity in the lung- a dialog between aerosol science and biology. J. Aerosol Sci. 42(10):668–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phalen, R. F. 1984. Inhalation studies: Foundations and techniques, 89. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raabe, O. G. 1968. The dilution of monodisperse suspensions for aerosolization. Am. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. J. 29(5):439–443. doi: 10.1080/00028896809343031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe, O. G. 1972. Operating characteristics of two compressed air nebulizers used in inhalation experiments. Fission product inhalation program annual report 1971–1972, 1–6. Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute, Albuquerque, N.M., LF-45.
   Google Scholar
• Rafidi, N., F. Brogaard, L. Chen, R. Hakansson, and A. Tabikh. 2018. CFD and experimental studies on capture of fine particles by liquid droplets in open spray towers. Sustain. Environ. Res. 28(6):382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.serj.2018.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secondo, L. E., N. J. Liu, and N. A. Lewinski. 2016. Methodological considerations when conducting in vitro, air-liquid interface exposures to engineered nanoparticles aerosols. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 47(3):225–262. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1223015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, S., S. Majeed, G. Kratzer, G. Vuillaume, J. Hoeng, and S. Frentzel. 2017. Characterization of the Vitrocell® 24/48 aerosol exposure system for its use in exposures to liquid aerosols. Toxicol. In Vitro 42:263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.04.021.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, D., and J. Adamson. 2013. A review of in vitro cigarette smoke exposure systems. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 65(7–8):1183–1193. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2013.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, D., J. Kilford, R. Payne, J. Adamson, K. Scott, A. Dalrymple, C. Meredith, and D. Dillon. 2013. Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis. Chem. Central J. 7(1):146. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorne, D., A. Dalrymple, D. Dillon, M. Duke, and C. Meredith. 2015. A comparative assessment of cigarette smoke aerosols using an in vitro air-liquid interface cytotoxicity test. Inhalation Toxicol. 12:629–640. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2015.1080773.
   Google Scholar
• Tippe, A., U. Heinzmann, and C. Roth. 2002. Deposition of fine and ultrafine aerosol particles during exposure at the air/cell interface. J. Aerosol Sci. 33(2):207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, S., and L. Palmberg. 2018. Air-liquid interface: relevant in vitro models for investigating air pollutant-induced pulmonary toxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 164(1):21–30. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, S., M. Hebestreit, T. Wilms, L. L. Conroy, and G. Rodrigo. 2013. Comet assay and air-liquid interface exposure system: a new combination to evaluate genotoxic effects of cigarette whole smoke in human lung cell lines. Toxicol. Vitro 27(6):1987–1991. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.06.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar