Characterization of particle number counters based on pulsed-mode diffusion charging

References

• Abegglen, M., L. Durdina, B. T. Brem, J. Wang, T. Rindlisbacher, J. C. Corbin, U. Lohmann, and B. Sierau. 2015. Effective density and mass-mobility exponents of particulate matter in aircraft turbine exhaust: Dependence on engine thrust and particle size. J. Aerosol Sci. 88:135–47. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanatidis, S., M. M. Maricq, L. Ntziachristos, and Z. Samaras. 2016. Measuring number, mass, and size of exhaust particles with diffusion chargers: The dual Pegasor Particle Sensor. J. Aerosol Sci. 92:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, G. 2016. Dieselgate: Who? What? How? Transport & Environment, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• AU-Richtlinie. 2017. Änderung der Richtlinie für die Durchführung der Untersuchung der Abgase von Kraftfahrzeugen nach Nummer 6.8.2 der Anlage VIIIa Straßenverkehrs-Zulassungs-Ordnung (StVZO) (AU-Richtlinie).
   Google Scholar
• Boveroux, F., S. Cassiers, P. Buekenhoudt, L. Chavatte, P. De Meyer, H. Jeanmart, S. Verhelst, and F. Contino. 2019. Feasibility study of a new test procedure to identify high emitters of particulate matter during periodic technical inspection. SAE Technical Papers, 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Burtscher, H., T. Lutz, and A. Mayer. 2019. A new periodic technical inspection for particle emissions of vehicles. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 5 (3):279–87. doi:10.1007/s40825-019-00128-z.
   Google Scholar
• Burtscher, H., and A. Schmidt-Ott. 2006. Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung der Anzahlkonzentration und des mittleren Durchmessers von in einem Trägergas suspendierten Partikeln.
   Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, P. F., J. G. Slowik, D. R. Worsnop, P. Davidovits, and J. L. Jimenez. 2004. Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: Theory. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38 (12):1185–205. doi:10.1080/027868290903907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierz, M., C. Houle, P. Steigmeier, and H. Burtscher. 2011. Design, calibration, and field performance of a miniature diffusion size classifier. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 45 (1):1–10. doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.516283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierz, M., D. Meier, P. Steigmeier, and H. Burtscher. 2014. Aerosol measurement by induced currents. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48 (4):350–7. doi:10.1080/02786826.2013.875981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fissan, H., S. Neumann, A. Trampe, D. Y. H. Pui, and W. G. Shin. 2006. Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area. J. Nanopart. Res. 9 (1):53–9. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9156-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B. 2018. Real Driving Emissions (RDE): Particle Number (PN) Portable Measurement Systems (PEMS) calibration. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., A. Joshi, L. Ntziachristos, and P. Dilara. 2019. European regulatory framework and particulate matter emissions of gasoline light-duty vehicles: A review. Catalysts 9 (7):586. doi:10.3390/catal9070586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., T. Lahde, R. Suarez-Bertoa, M. Clairotte, T. Grigoratos, A. Zardini, A. Perujo, and G. Martini. 2018. Particle number measurements in the European Legislation and future JRC activities. Combustion Engines.
   Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., A. Mamakos, J. Andersson, P. Dilara, G. Martini, W. Schindler, and A. Bergmann. 2012. Measurement of automotive nonvolatile particle number emissions within the European legislative framework: A review. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46 (7):719–49. doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.661103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., M. Maricq, L. Ntziachristos, C. Dardiotis, X. Wang, H. Axmann, A. Bergmann, and W. Schindler. 2014. Review of motor vehicle particulate emissions sampling and measurement: From smoke and filter mass to particle number. J. Aerosol Sci. 67:48–86. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., F. Riccobono, and P. Bonnel. 2014. Feasibility study on the extension of the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) procedure to Particle Number (PN) Experimental evaluation of portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) with diffusion chargers (DCs) to measure particle number (PN) con. JRC Science and Policy Reports, 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., F. Riccobono, and P. Bonnel. 2015. Feasibility study on the extension of the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) procedure to Particle Number (PN), Phase II. Publications Office of the European Union, 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., X. Wang, H. G. Horn, J. Spielvogel, C. Gerhart, J. Southgate, L. Jing, M. Kasper, Y. Drossinos, and A. Krasenbrink. 2009. Calibration of condensation particle counters for legislated vehicle number emission measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 43 (12):1164–73. doi:10.1080/02786820903242029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloor, B. 2018. Survey about functional efficiency of DPF during PTI in Zürich. ETH-Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S. J., and M. Maricq. 2001. Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter. J. Aerosol Sci. 32 (6):749–64. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00111-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRP. 1994. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. ICRP Publication 66 Ann. ICRP 24 (1-3).
   Google Scholar
• ISO27981. 2015. International Standard ISO 27891:2015(E) Aerosol particle number concentration—Calibration of condensation particle counters.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., M. Irwin, J. P. R. Symonds, J. S. Olfert, and A. Boies. 2018. Measuring aerosol size distributions with the aerodynamic aerosol classifier. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 52 (6):655–65. doi:10.1080/02786826.2018.1440063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, H., and D. B. Kittelson. 2005. Characterization of aerosol surface instruments in transition regime. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39 (9):902–11. doi:10.1080/02786820500295701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadijk, G., M. Elstgeest, N. E. Ligterink, and P. J. van der Mark. 2017. Investigation into a Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI) test method to check for presence and proper functioning of Diesel Particulate Filters in light-duty diesel vehicles—Part 2. Technical report, Earth, Life & Social Sciences, Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Kittelson, D. B. 1998. Engines and nanoparticles: A review. J. Aerosol Sci. 29 (5–6):575–88. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(97)10037-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, P., P. A. Baron, and K. Willeke. 2011. Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques, and applications. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Litton, C. D., L. Graybeal, and M. Hertzberg. 1979. Submicrometer particle detector and size analyzer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 50 (7):817–23. doi:10.1063/1.1135957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricq, M. M. 2006. On the electrical charge of motor vehicle exhaust particles. J. Aerosol Sci. 37 (7):858–74. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, J., M. Voetz, and H. J. Kiesling. 2010. Monitor for detecting and assessing exposure to airborne nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 12 (1):21–37. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9695-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Infrastructuur En Waterstaat, N. 2019. Regulation of the Minister for Environment and Housing of November 21, 2019, No. IENW/BSK-2019/202498, amending the Vehicle Regulations to enable the control of diesel particulate filters with a particle counter and to apply other technical changes. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/tris/en/index.cfm/search/?trisaction=search.detail&year=2019&num=328&mLang=DE.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, M., U. Lehmann, and J. Rutter. 2005. Comparison of mass-based and non-mass-based particle measurement systems for ultra-low emissions from automotive sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (7):2229–38. doi:10.1021/es049550d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, R. T., T. J. Johnson, A. M. Boies, and S. Hochgreb. 2019a. Measuring aerosol active surface area by direct ultraviolet photoionization and charge capture in continuous flow. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 53 (12):1429–40. doi:10.1080/02786826.2019.1661958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, R. T., N. Yamasaki, M. A. Schriefl, A. M. Boies, and S. Hochgreb. 2019b. Modelling the effect of aerosol polydispersity on unipolar charging and measurement. J. Aerosol Sci. 130:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntziachristos, L., B. Giechaskiel, J. Ristimaki, and J. Keskinen. 2004. Use of a corona charger for the characterisation of automotive exhaust aerosol. J. Aerosol Sci. 35:943–63. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation2017/1347. 2017. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1347.
   Google Scholar
• Reinisch, T., A. Bergmann, G. Brunnhofer, A. Mamakos, and M. Fierz. 2015. Particle Number Portable Emission Measurement System. In Aerosol Technology 2015, 122, Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, T., A. Virtanen, J. Kannosto, J. Keskinen, M. Lappi, and L. Pirjola. 2007. Nucleation mode particles with a nonvolatile core in the exhaust of a heavy duty diesel vehicle. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (18):6384–9. doi:10.1021/es0705339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Ott, A. 1988. New approaches to in situ characterization of ultrafine agglomerates. J. Aerosol Sci. 19 (5):553–63. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(88)90207-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefl, M. A., A. Bergmann, and M. Fierz. 2016. Characterization and Modelling of a Novel Particle Number Detector. In European Aerosol Conference, Tours.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefl, M. A., A. Bergmann, and M. Fierz. 2018. Design principles for sensing particle number concentration and mean particle size with unipolar diffusion charging. IEEE Sensors J. 19 (4):1392–99. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2018.2880278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwelberger, M., A. Mamakos, M. Fierz, and B. Giechaskiel. 2019. Experimental assessment of an electrofilter and a tandem positive-negative corona charger for the measurement of charged nanoparticles formed in selective catalytic reduction systems. Appl. Sci. 9 (6):1051. doi:10.3390/app9061051.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, H., S. Abe, and T. Yamaguchi. 1983. New NaCl aerosol generator. J. Aerosol Sci. 14 (3):242–248. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(83)90100-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, W. G., J. Wang, M. Mertler, B. Sachweh, H. Fissan, and D. Y. H. Pui. 2010. The effect of particle morphology on unipolar diffusion charging of nanoparticle agglomerates in the transition regime. J. Aerosol Sci. 41 (11):975–986. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile, L., C. V. Trassierra, G. Dell’Agli, and G. Buonanno. 2013. Ultrafine particle generation through atomization technique: The influence of the solution. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 13 (6):1667–1677. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2013.03.0085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todea, A. M., S. Beckmann, H. Kaminski, and C. Asbach. 2015. Accuracy of electrical aerosol sensors measuring lung deposited surface area concentrations. J. Aerosol Sci. 89:96–109. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSI Incorporated. 2006. Model 3776 Ultrafine Condensation Particle Counter, Operation and Service Manual.
   Google Scholar
• TSI Incorporated. 2012. Condensation Particle Counter Model 3775—Specification Sheet, P/N 2980343 Rev C.
   Google Scholar
• TSI Incorporated. 2015. Specification Sheet: Emissions Tester Model 3795, P/N 5001623 Rev D (A4).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., R. Caldow, G. J. Sem, N. Hama, and H. Sakurai. 2010. Evaluation of a condensation particle counter for vehicle emission measurement: Experimental procedure and effects of calibration aerosol material. J. Aerosol Sci. 41 (3):306–18. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, H. 2019. Improving methodology of particulate measurement in periodic technical inspection with high-sensitivity techniques: laser light scattering photometry and particle number method. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 5 (1):37–44. doi:10.1007/s40825-019-0108-z.
   Google Scholar