Design and experimental setup of a new concept of an aerosol-on-demand print head

References

• Ansys. 2021. Ansys Fluent user’s guide: Release 2021 R2. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Benitez, J. L. 2016. Fluiddynamische Simulation hinsichtlich der Fokussierung eines Aerosolstroms [Fluid dynamic simulation with regard to the focussing of an aerosol flow]. Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. S., A. F. Facchetti, and R. Reuss. 2017. A circuits and systems perspective of organic/printed electronics: Review, challenges, and contemporary and emerging design approaches. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circuits Syst. 7 (1):1–21. doi:10.1109/JETCAS.2017.2673863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H. W., T. Zhou, M. Singh, and G. E. Jabbour. 2015. Recent developments and directions in printed nanomaterials. Nanoscale 7 (8):3338–55. doi:10.1039/C4NR03915G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Z. 2016. Printed electronics: Materials, technologies and applications. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R., and X. He. 2021. IDTechEx: Printed, organic and flexible electronics 2020–2030: Forecasts, technologies, markets. Accessed July 1, 2021. https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/flexible-gedruckte-und-organische-elektronik-2020-2030-prognosen-technologien-m-rkte/687.
   Google Scholar
• Derby, B. 2010. Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: Fluid property requirements, feature stability, and resolution. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40 (1):395–414. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duineveld, P. 2003. The stability of ink-jet printed lines of liquid with zero receding contact angle on a homogeneous substrate. J. Fluid Mech. 477:175–200. doi:10.1017/S0022112002003117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essien, M. 2016. Apparatuses and methods for stable aerosol deposition using an aerodynamic lens system. United States Patent US 2016/0193627 A1.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández de la Mora, J., and P. Riesco-Chueca. 1988. Aerodynamic focusing of particles in carrier gas. J. Fluid Mech. 195 (1):1–21. doi:10.1017/S0022112088002307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, S., H. M. Sauer, S. Weißenseel, J. Zembron, R. Tone, E. Dörsam, M. Schaefer, and M. Schulz-Ruthenberg. 2016. Printing and processing techniques. In Organic and printed electronics: Fundamentals and applications, eds. G. Nisato, D. Lupo, and S. Ganz, 48–116. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gosman, A. D., and E. Loannides. 1983. Aspects of computer simulation of liquid-fuelled combustors. J. Energy 7 (6):482–90. doi:10.2514/3.62687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. A., A. Bolduc, S. G. Cloutier, and R. Izquierdo. 2016. Aerosol Jet Printing for printed electronics rapid prototyping. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Montreal, QC, 866–869. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2016.7527378.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, M., and A. B. Marin. 2012. 3D Aerosol Jet Printing—Adding electronics functionality to RP/RM. Direct Digital Manufacturing Conference, Berlin. Accessed February 24, 2020. https://optomec.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Optomec_NEOTECH_DDMC_3D_Aerosol_Jet_Printing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Keicher, D. M., A. Cook, E. P. Baldonado, and M. Essien. 2018. Apparatus for pneumatic shuttering of an aerosol particle stream. United States Patent US 10,058,881.
   Google Scholar
• King, B. H. 2014. Miniature aerosoljet and aerosol jet array. United States Patent US 8,640,975 B2.
   Google Scholar
• Kümmel, W. 2007. Technische Strömungsmechanik [Technical fluid mechanics]. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Teubner. doi:10.1007/978-3-8351-9126-6_7.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. J., S. D. Gillmor, and M. G. Lagally. 2004. Controlled deposition of picoliter amounts of fluid using an ultrasonically driven micropipette. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75 (4):832–6. doi:10.1063/1.1688436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., M. Hirtz, H. Fuchs, and Z. Zheng. 2019. Development of dip-pen nanolithography (DPN) and its derivatives. Nano. Micro. Small 15 (21):1900564. doi:10.1002/smll.201900564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdassi, S. 2010. The chemistry of inkjet inks. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Magdassi, S., and A. Kamyshny. 2017. Nanomaterials for 2D and 3D printing. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Menter, F. R. 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32 (8):1598–605. doi:10.2514/3.12149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mette, A., P. L. Richter, M. Hörteis, and S. W. Glunz. 2007. Metal Aerosol Jet Printing for solar cell metallization. Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 15 (7):621–7. doi:10.1002/pip.759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neotech. 2021. 3D printed electronics applications realised by Neotech AMT. Accessed October 19, 2021. https://neotech-amt.com/applications.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhold, I. 2017. Inkjet printing of functional materials and post-processing. In Nanomaterials for 2D and 3D printing, eds. S. Magdassi, and A. Kamyshny, 27–49. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Salary, R., J. P. Lombardi, M. S. Tootooni, R. Donovan, P. K. Rao, P. Borgesen, and M. D. Poliks. 2017. Computational fluid dynamics modeling and online monitoring of Aerosol Jet Printing process. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139 (2):021015. doi:10.1115/1.4034591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaker, G., M. Tentzeris, and S. Safavi-Naeini. 2010. Low-cost antennas for mm-Wave sensing applications using inkjet printing of silver nano-particles on liquid crystal polymers. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Toronto, ON, 1–4. doi:10.1109/APS.2010.5562281.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, I., R. Thelen, and U. Gengenbach. 2020a. Assessment of high-resolution 3D printed optics for the use case of rotation optics. Opt. Express. 28 (9):13423–31. doi:10.1364/OE.391697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, I., R. Thelen, and U. Gengenbach. 2020b. Enhancement of high-resolution 3D inkjet-printing of optical freeform surfaces using digital twins. Micromachines 12 (1):35. doi:10.3390/mi12010035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIJTechnology. 2021. Accessed December 13, 2021. https://sijtechnology.com/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Sirringhaus, H., and T. Shimoda. 2003. Inkjet printing of functional materials. MRS Bull. 28 (11):802–6. doi:10.1557/mrs2003.228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoplot. 2021. Accessed December 13, 2021. https://www.sonoplot.com.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, V., J. B. Chang, A. de la Fuente Vornbrock, D. C. Huang, L. Jagannathan, F. Liao, B. Mattis, S. Molesa, D. R. Redinger, and D. Soltman. 2008. Printed electronics for low-cost electronic systems: Technology status and application development. ESSCIRC 2008—34th European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Edinburgh, 17–24. doi:10.1109/ESSCIRC.2008.4681785.
   Google Scholar
• Suganuma, K. 2014. Introduction to printed electronics. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, M. 2020. Neue Methodik zur Optimierung von Druckverfahren für die Herstellung funktionaler Mikrostrukturen und hybrider elektronischer Schaltungen [New methodology for optimising printing processes for the production of functional microstructures and hybrid electronic circuits]. Dissertation, Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT).
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, M., A. Hofmann, R. Scharnowell, U. Gengenbach, I. Sieber, and A. Wenka. 2018. Druckkopf und Druckverfahren [Print head and printing method]. Patent: DE 10 2018 103 049.5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-W., D.-C. Pang, Y.-E. Tseng, and C.-C. Tseng. 2014. The study of light guide plate fabricated by inkjet printing technique. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 45 (3):1049–55. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2013.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, D. C. 2006. Turbulenc modelling for CFD. 3rd ed. La Canada, CA: DCW Industries, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. 2017. Inorganic nanomaterials for printed electronics: A review. Nanoscale 9 (22):7342–72. doi:10.1039/C7NR01604B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokota, T., K. Kuribara, T. Tokuhara, U. Zschieschang, H. Klauk, K. Takimiya, Y. Sadamitsu, M. Hamada, T. Sekitani, and T. Someya. 2013. Flexible low-voltage organic transistors with high thermal stability at 250 °C. Adv. Mater. 25 (27):3639–44. doi:10.1002/adma.201300941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar