The hygroscopic properties of biomass burning aerosol from Eucalyptus and cow dung under different combustion conditions

References

• Andreae, M. O. 2019. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – An updated assessment. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19 (13):8523–46. doi:10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, P. A., G. Allen, M. Gallagher, J. R. Pitt, R. E. Fisher, T. Bannan, E. G. Nisbet, S. J. B. Bauguitte, D. Pasternak, S. Cliff, et al. 2020. Airborne measurements of fire emission factors for African biomass burning sampled during the MOYA campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (23):15443–59. doi:10.5194/acp-20-15443-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, M. R., R. M. Garland, C. A. Hasenkopf, T. Baynard, A. R. Ravishankara, and M. A. Tolbert. 2008. A laboratory investigation of the relative humidity dependence of light extinction by organic compounds from lignin combustion. Environ. Res. Lett. 3 (4):045003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyene, A. D., and S. F. Koch. 2013. Clean fuel-saving technology adoption in urban Ethiopia. Energy Econ. 36:605–13. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. C., S. J. Doherty, D. W. Fahey, P. M. Forster, T. Berntsen, B. J. DeAngelo, M. G. Flanner, S. Ghan, B. Kärcher, D. Koch, et al. 2013. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118 (11):5380–552. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougiatioti, A., S. Bezantakos, I. Stavroulas, N. Kalivitis, P. Kokkalis, G. Biskos, N. Mihalopoulos, A. Papayannis, and A. Nenes. 2016. Biomass-burning impact on CCN number, hygroscopicity and cloud formation during summertime in the eastern Mediterranean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (11):7389–409. doi:10.5194/acp-16-7389-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, C. A., N. L. Wagner, B. E. Anderson, A. R. Attwood, A. Beyersdorf, P. Campuzano-Jost, A. G. Carlton, D. A. Day, G. S. Diskin, T. D. Gordon, et al. 2016. Aerosol optical properties in the southeastern United States in summer – Part 1: Hygroscopic growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (8):4987–5007. doi:10.5194/acp-16-4987-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrico, C. M., M. D. Petters, S. M. Kreidenweis, J. L. Collett, Jr., G. Engling, and W. C. Malm. 2008. Aerosol hygroscopicity and cloud droplet activation of extracts of filters from biomass burning experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 113 (D8):1–9. doi:10.1029/2007JD009274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchini, M. A., L. A. T. Machado, M. O. Andreae, S. T. Martin, R. I. Albrecht, P. Artaxo, H. M. J. Barbosa, S. Borrmann, D. Fütterer, T. Jurkat, et al. 2017. Sensitivities of Amazonian clouds to aerosols and updraft speed. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17 (16):10037–50. doi:10.5194/acp-17-10037-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerully, K. M., T. Raatikainen, S. Lance, D. Tkacik, P. Tiitta, T. Petäjä, M. Ehn, M. Kulmala, D. R. Worsnop, A. Laaksonen, et al. 2011. Aerosol hygroscopicity and CCN activation kinetics in a boreal forest environment during the 2007 EUCAARI campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (23):12369–86. doi:10.5194/acp-11-12369-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R. Y. W., J. G. Slowik, N. C. Shantz, A. Vlasenko, J. Liggio, S. J. Sjostedt, W. R. Leaitch, and J. P. D. Abbatt. 2010. The hygroscopicity parameter (κ) of ambient organic aerosol at a field site subject to biogenic and anthropogenic influences: Relationship to degree of aerosol oxidation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (11):5047–64. doi:10.5194/acp-10-5047-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. W. A., P. Verburg, A. Shackelford, D. Zhu, R. Susfalk, J. C. Chow, and J. G. Watson. 2010. Moisture effects on carbon and nitrogen emission from burning of wildland biomass. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (14):6617–25. doi:10.5194/acp-10-6617-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. F., A. Wiedensohler, H. Eichler, J. Heintzenberg, M. Tesche, A. Ansmann, M. Wendisch, H. Su, D. Althausen, H. Herrmann, et al. 2008. Relative humidity dependence of aerosol optical properties and direct radiative forcing in the surface boundary layer at Xinken in Pearl River Delta of China: An observation based numerical study. Atmos. Environ. 42 (25):6373–97. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. D., Y. Shinozuka, V. N. Kapustin, S. Howell, B. Huebert, S. Doherty, T. Anderson, D. Covert, J. Anderson, X. Hua, et al. 2004. Size distributions and mixtures of dust and black carbon aerosol in Asian outflow: Physiochemistry and optical properties. J. Geophys. Res. 109 (D15):1–20. doi:10.1029/2003JD004378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. N., K. A. Malek, P. N. Razafindrambinina, T. M. Raymond, D. D. Dutcher, A. A. Asa-Awuku, and M. A. Freedman. 2020. Direct comparison of the submicron aerosol hygroscopicity of water-soluble sugars. ACS Earth Space Chem. 4 (12):2215–26. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, K. W., M. D. Petters, N. Meskhidze, S. Suda Petters, and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2016. Hygroscopic growth and cloud droplet activation of xanthan gum as a proxy for marine hydrogels. JGR Atmos. 121 (19):803–11. doi:10.1002/2016JD025143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusek, U., G. P. Frank, A. Massling, K. Zeromskiene, Y. Iinuma, O. Schmid, G. Helas, T. Hennig, A. Wiedensohler, and M. O. Andreae. 2011. Water uptake by biomass burning aerosol at sub- and supersaturated conditions: Closure studies and implications for the role of organics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (18):9519–32. doi:10.5194/acp-11-9519-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, T. F., B. N. Holben, D. E. Ward, M. M. Mukelabai, O. Dubovik, A. Smirnov, J. S. Schafer, N. C. Hsu, S. J. Piketh, A. Queface, et al. 2003. Variability of biomass burning aerosol optical characteristics in southern Africa during the SAFARI 2000 dry season campaign and a comparison of single scattering albedo estimates from radiometric measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D13):1–21. doi:10.1029/2002JD002321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler, H., Y. F. Cheng, W. Birmili, A. Nowak, A. Wiedensohler, E. Brüggemann, T. Gnauk, H. Herrmann, D. Althausen, A. Ansmann, et al. 2008. Hygroscopic properties and extinction of aerosol particles at ambient relative humidity in South-Eastern China. Atmos. Environ. 42 (25):6321–34. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhart, G. J., C. J. Hennigan, M. A. Miracolo, A. L. Robinson, and S. N. Pandis. 2012. Cloud condensation nuclei activity of fresh primary and aged biomass burning aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 (15):7285–93. doi:10.5194/acp-12-7285-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. K., C. D. Cappa, and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2015. Atmospheric processes and their controlling influence on cloud condensation nuclei activity. Chem. Rev. 115 (10):4199–217. doi:10.1021/cr5006292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., P. Zieger, M. Gysel, L. Kammermann, P. F. DeCarlo, U. Baltensperger, and E. Weingartner. 2010. Measured and predicted aerosol light scattering enhancement factors at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (5):2319–33. doi:10.5194/acp-10-2319-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamant, C., P. Knippertz, A. H. Fink, A. Akpo, B. Brooks, C. J. Chiu, H. Coe, S. Danuor, M. Evans, O. Jegede, et al. 2018. The Dynamics–Aerosol–Chemistry–Cloud Interactions in West Africa field campaign: Overview and research highlights. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 99 (1):83–104. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0256.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, M. R., D. Z. Short, S. Hosseini, W. Lichtenberg, and A. A. Asa-Awuku. 2013. Changes in droplet surface tension affect the observed hygroscopicity of photochemically aged biomass burning aerosol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (19):10980–6. doi:10.1021/es401867j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohil, K., C. N. Mao, D. Rastogi, C. Peng, M. Tang, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2022. Hybrid water adsorption and solubility partitioning for aerosol hygroscopicity and droplet growth. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22 (19):12769–87. doi:10.5194/acp-22-12769-2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, S. L., C. M. Carrico, C. Allen, J. Lam, S. Dabli, A. P. Sullivan, A. C. Aiken, T. Rahn, D. Romonosky, P. Chylek, et al. 2018. Southwestern U.S. biomass burning smoke hygroscopicity: The role of plant phenology, chemical composition, and combustion properties. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123 (10):5416–32. doi:10.1029/2017JD028162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarig, M., A. Ansmann, J. Gasteiger, K. Kandler, D. Althausen, H. Baars, M. Radenz, and D. A. Farrell. 2017. Dry versus wet marine particle optical properties: RH dependence of depolarization ratio, backscatter, and extinction from multiwavelength lidar measurements during SALTRACE. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17 (23):14199–217. doi:10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. S., S. Hantson, C. E. Scott, J. O. Kaplan, K. J. Pringle, L. P. Nieradzik, A. Rap, G. A. Folberth, D. V. Spracklen, and K. S. Carslaw. 2018. Reassessment of pre-industrial fire emissions strongly affects anthropogenic aerosol forcing. Nat. Commun. 9 (1):3182. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05592-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, J. L., and W. C. Malm. 2007. Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies from ground-based measurements since 1990. J. Geophys. Res. 112 (D16):1–24. doi:10.1029/2007JD008484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. M. K., J. Hong, T. Raatikainen, K. Kristensen, A. Ylisirniö, A. Virtanen, T. Petäjä, M. Glasius, and N. L. Prisle. 2015. Hygroscopic properties and cloud condensation nuclei activation of limonene-derived organosulfates and their mixtures with ammonium sulfate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 (24):14071–89. doi:10.5194/acp-15-14071-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, J. M., S. J. Abel, P. A. Barrett, N. Bellouin, A. Blyth, K. N. Bower, M. Brooks, K. Carslaw, H. Che, H. Coe, et al. 2021. The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21 (2):1049–84. doi:10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank, WHO. 2020. Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kacarab, M., K. L. Thornhill, A. Dobracki, S. G. Howell, J. R. O’Brien, S. Freitag, M. R. Poellot, R. Wood, P. Zuidema, J. Redemann, et al. 2020. Biomass burning aerosol as a modulator of the droplet number in the southeast Atlantic region. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (5):3029–40. doi:10.5194/acp-20-3029-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., L. Ahlm, T. Yli-Juuti, M. Lawler, H. Keskinen, J. Tröstl, S. Schobesberger, J. Duplissy, A. Amorim, F. Bianchi, et al. 2016. Hygroscopicity of nanoparticles produced from homogeneous nucleation in the CLOUD experiments. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (1):293–304. doi:10.5194/acp-16-293-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottek, M., J. Grieser, C. Beck, B. Rudolf, and F. Rubel. 2006. World map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 15 (3):259–63. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreidenweis, S. M., and A. Asa-Awuku. 2014. 5.13 - Aerosol hygroscopicity: Particle water content and its role in atmospheric processes. In Treatise on geochemistry, ed. Heinrich D. Holland and Karl K. Turekian, 2nd ed., 331–61. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kreidenweis, S. M., K. Koehler, P. J. DeMott, A. J. Prenni, C. Carrico, and B. Ervens. 2005. Water activity and activation diameters from hygroscopicity data - Part I: Theory and application to inorganic salts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5 (5):1357–1370. doi:10.5194/acp-5-1357-2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lamarque, J. F., T. C. Bond, V. Eyring, C. Granier, A. Heil, Z. Klimont, D. Lee, C. Liousse, A. Mieville, B. Owen, et al. 2010. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: Methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (15):7017–39. doi:10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laris, P., M. Koné, F. Dembélé, C. M. Rodrigue, L. Yang, R. Jacobs, and Q. Laris. 2021. Methane gas emissions from savanna fires: What analysis of local burning regimes in a working West African landscape tell us. Biogeosciences 18 (23):6229–44. doi:10.5194/bg-18-6229-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W., Y. Deng, R. Zhou, M. Itoh, M. Mochida, and M. Kuwata. 2022. Water solubility distribution of organic matter accounts for the discrepancy in hygroscopicity among sub- and supersaturated humidity regimes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (24):17924–35. doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c04647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. A., W. P. Arnott, H. Moosmüller, R. K. Chakrabarty, C. M. Carrico, S. M. Kreidenweis, D. E. Day, W. C. Malm, A. Laskin, J. L. Jimenez, et al. 2009. Reduction in biomass burning aerosol light absorption upon humidification: Roles of inorganically-induced hygroscopicity, particle collapse, and photoacoustic heat and mass transfer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 (22):8949–66. doi:10.5194/acp-9-8949-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., Y. Hu, J. Chen, Z. Ma, X. Ye, X. Yang, L. Wang, X. Wang, and A. Mellouki. 2016. Physiochemical properties of carbonaceous aerosol from agricultural residue burning: Density, volatility, and hygroscopicity. Atmos. Environ. 140:94–105. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. L., Z. Ma, J. M. Chen, X. M. Wang, X. N. Ye, L. Wang, X. Yang, H. D. Kan, D. J. Donaldson, and A. Mellouki. 2015. Evolution of biomass burning smoke particles in the dark. Atmos. Environ. 120:244–52. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., J. Allan, J. Whitehead, D. Young, M. Flynn, H. Coe, G. McFiggans, Z. L. Fleming, and B. Bandy. 2013. Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (4):2015–29. doi:10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek, K. A., K. Gohil, H. A. Al-Abadleh, and A. A. Asa-Awuku. 2022. Hygroscopicity of polycatechol and polyguaiacol secondary organic aerosol in sub- and supersaturated water vapor environments. Environ. Sci.: Atmos. 2 (1):24–33. doi:10.1039/D1EA00063B.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., T. Tritscher, Z. Jurányi, M. F. Heringa, B. Sierau, E. Weingartner, R. Chirico, M. Gysel, A. S. H. Prévôt, U. Baltensperger, et al. 2013. Hygroscopic properties of fresh and aged wood burning particles. J. Aerosol Sci. 56:15–29. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoli, P., A. T. Lambe, A. T. Ahern, L. R. Williams, M. Ehn, J. Mikkilä, M. R. Canagaratna, W. H. Brune, T. B. Onasch, J. T. Jayne, et al. 2010. Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol (SOA) particles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 (24):n/a–/a. doi:10.1029/2010GL045258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFiggans, G., P. Artaxo, U. Baltensperger, H. Coe, M. C. Facchini, G. Feingold, S. Fuzzi, M. Gysel, A. Laaksonen, U. Lohmann, et al. 2006. The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6 (9):2593–2649.10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. H., A. Nenes, and J. Medina. 2010. Scanning mobility CCN analysis—A method for fast measurements of size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 44 (10):861–71. doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.498715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosmüller, H., R. Varma, and W. P. Arnott. 2005. Cavity ring-down and cavity-enhanced detection techniques for the measurement of aerosol extinction. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39 (1):30–9. doi:10.1080/027868290903880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, D. H. L., R. M. Li, S. V. Raghavan, and S. Y. Liong. 2017. Investigating the relationship between Aerosol Optical Depth and Precipitation over Southeast Asia with Relative Humidity as an influencing factor. Sci. Rep. 7 (1):1–13. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10858-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajunoja, A., A. T. Lambe, J. Hakala, N. Rastak, M. J. Cummings, J. F. Brogan, L. Hao, M. Paramonov, J. Hong, N. L. Prisle, et al. 2015. Adsorptive uptake of water by semisolid secondary organic aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 (8):3063–8. doi:10.1002/2015GL063142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. N., and J. H. Jiang. 2021. Cloud condensation nuclei characteristics at the Southern Great Plains site: Role of particle size distribution and aerosol hygroscopicity. Environ. Res. Commun. 3 (7):075002. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ac0e0b.
   Google Scholar
• Petters, M. D., C. M. Carrico, S. M. Kreidenweis, A. J. Prenni, P. J. DeMott, J. L. Collett, and H. Moosmüller. 2009. Cloud condensation nucleation activity of biomass burning aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. 114 (D22):1–16. doi:10.1029/2009JD012353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petters, M. D., and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2007. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 (8):1961–71. doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokhrel, R. P., J. Gordon, M. N. Fiddler, and S. Bililign. 2020. Impact of combustion conditions on physical and morphological properties of biomass burning aerosol. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55 (1):80–91. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1822512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokhrel, R. P., J. Gordon, M. N. Fiddler, and S. Bililign. 2021. Determination of emission factors of pollutants from biomass burning of African fuels in laboratory measurements. JGR Atmos. 126 (20):e2021JD034731. doi:10.1029/2021JD034731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokhrel, R. P., N. L. Wagner, J. M. Langridge, D. A. Lack, T. Jayarathne, E. A. Stone, C. E. Stockwell, R. J. Yokelson, and S. M. Murphy. 2016. Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with EC/OC for aerosol emissions from biomass burning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (15):9549–61. doi:10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, K. J., H. Tost, A. Pozzer, U. Pöschl, and J. Lelieveld. 2010. Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (12):5241–55. doi:10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redemann, J., R. Wood, P. Zuidema, S. J. Doherty, B. Luna, S. E. LeBlanc, M. S. Diamond, Y. Shinozuka, I. Y. Chang, R. Ueyama, et al. 2021. An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: Aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21 (3):1507–63. doi:10.5194/acp-21-1507-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutter, P., H. Su, J. Trentmann, M. Simmel, D. Rose, S. S. Gunthe, H. Wernli, M. O. Andreae, and U. Pöschl. 2009. Aerosol- and updraft-limited regimes of cloud droplet formation: Influence of particle number, size and hygroscopicity on the activation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 (18):7067–80. doi:10.5194/acp-9-7067-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissler, J., A. Vestin, E. Swietlicki, G. Fisch, J. Zhou, P. Artaxo, and M. O. Andreae. 2006. Size distribution and hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles from dry-season biomass burning in Amazonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6 (2):471–91. doi:10.5194/acp-6-471-2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. C., and A. Nenes. 2005. A continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39 (3):206–21. doi:10.1080/027868290913988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., S. S. Gunthe, H. Su, R. M. Garland, H. Yang, M. Berghof, Y. F. Cheng, B. Wehner, P. Achtert, A. Nowak, et al. 2011. Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 2: Size-resolved aerosol chemical composition, diurnal cycles, and externally mixed weakly CCN-active soot particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (6):2817–36. doi:10.5194/acp-11-2817-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer, H. M., M. L. Pöhlker, O. Krüger, E. Blades, P. Sealy, N. N. Lata, Z. Cheng, S. China, A. P. Ault, P. K. Quinn, et al. 2022. African smoke particles act as cloud condensation nuclei in the wintertime tropical North Atlantic boundary layer over Barbados. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2022:1–39. doi:10.5194/acp-2022-341.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Y., and K. Suzuki. 2019. How do aerosols affect cloudiness? Science 363 (6427):580–1. doi:10.1126/science.aaw3720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., M. N. Fiddler, and S. Bililign. 2016. Measurement of size-dependent single scattering albedo of fresh biomass burning aerosols using the extinction-minus-scattering technique with a combination of cavity ring-down spectroscopy and nephelometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16 (21):13491–507. doi:10.5194/acp-16-13491-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., M. N. Fiddler, D. Smith, and S. Bililign. 2014. Error analysis and uncertainty in the determination of aerosol optical properties using cavity ring-down spectroscopy, integrating nephelometry, and the extinction-minus-scattering method. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48 (12):1345–59. doi:10.1080/02786826.2014.984062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. M., M. N. Fiddler, R. P. Pokhrel, and S. Bililign. 2020. Laboratory studies of fresh and aged biomass burning aerosol emitted from east African biomass fuels – Part 1: Optical properties. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (17):10149–68. doi:10.5194/acp-20-10149-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. M., M. N. Fiddler, K. G. Sexton, and S. Bililign. 2019. Construction and characterization of an indoor smog chamber for measuring the optical and physicochemical properties of aging biomass burning aerosols. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 19 (3):467–83. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2018.06.0243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spracklen, D. V., K. S. Carslaw, M. Kulmala, V. Kerminen, S. Sihto, I. Riipinen, J. Merikanto, G. W. Mann, M. P. Chipperfield, A. Wiedensohler, et al. 2008. Contribution of particle formation to global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 (6):1–5. doi:10.1029/2007GL033038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawa, A. W., R. Elleman, A. G. Hallar, D. Covert, K. Ricci, R. Provencal, T. W. Owano, H. H. Jonsson, B. Schmid, A. P. Luu, et al. 2006. Comparison of in situ aerosol extinction and scattering coefficient measurements made during the Aerosol Intensive Operating Period. J. Geophys. Res. 111 (D5):1–17. doi:10.1029/2005JD006056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streets, D. G., T. C. Bond, T. Lee, and C. Jang. 2004. On the future of carbonaceous aerosol emissions. J. Geophys. Res. 109 (D24):1–15. doi:10.1029/2004JD004902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swietlicki, E., H. C. Hansson, K. Hämeri, B. Svenningsson, A. Massling, G. McFiggans, P. H. McMurry, T. Petäjä, P. Tunved, M. Gysel, et al. 2008. Hygroscopic properties of submicrometer atmospheric aerosol particles measured with H-TDMA instruments in various environments—A review. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 60 (3):432–69. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00350.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., C. K. Chan, Y. Jie Li, H. Su, Q. Ma, Z. Wu, G. Zhang, Z. Wang, M. Ge, M. Hu, et al. 2019. A review of experimental techniques for aerosol hygroscopicity studies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19 (19):12631–86. doi:10.5194/acp-19-12631-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. E., N. Barta, D. Policarpio, and R. DuVall. 2008. A fixed frequency aerosol albedometer. Opt. Express. 16 (3):2191–205. doi:10.1364/Oe.16.002191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. E., B. W. Smith, and J. D. Winefordner. 2002. Monitoring atmospheric particulate matter through cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 74 (9):1962–7. doi:10.1021/ac0110505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, G. D., C. L. Ryder, E. J. Highwood, L. C. Shaffrey, and B. T. Johnson. 2018. The effect of South American biomass burning aerosol emissions on the regional climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 (8):5321–42. doi:10.5194/acp-18-5321-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titos, G., A. Cazorla, P. Zieger, E. Andrews, H. Lyamani, M. J. Granados-Muñoz, F. J. Olmo, and L. Alados-Arboledas. 2016. Effect of hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coefficient: A review of measurements, techniques and error sources. Atmos. Environ. 141:494–507. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2017. World population prospects: The 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248, United Nations, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Vakkari, V., V.-M. Kerminen, J. P. Beukes, P. Tiitta, P. G. Zyl, M. Josipovic, A. D. Venter, K. Jaars, D. R. Worsnop, M. Kulmala, et al. 2014. Rapid changes in biomass burning aerosols by atmospheric oxidation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 (7):2644–51. doi:10.1002/2014GL059396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werf, G. R., J. T. Randerson, L. Giglio, G. J. Collatz, M. Mu, P. S. Kasibhatla, D. C. Morton, R. S. DeFries, Y. Jin, and T. T. van Leeuwen. 2010. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (23):11707–35. doi:10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Y. Cheng, N. Ma, E. Mikhailov, U. Pöschl, and H. Su. 2017. Dependence of the hygroscopicity parameter κ on particle size, humidity and solute concentration: Implications for laboratory experiments, field measurements and model studies. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions: 1–33. doi:10.5194/acp-2017-253.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedensohler, A. 1988. An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range. J. Aerosol Sci. 19 (3):387–9. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(88)90278-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO. 2016. WMO/GAW aerosol measurement procedures, guidelines and recommendations. GAW Report No. 227.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. J., L. Poulain, S. Henning, K. Dieckmann, W. Birmili, M. Merkel, D. van Pinxteren, G. Spindler, K. Müller, F. Stratmann, et al. 2013. Relating particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity to chemical composition during the HCCT-2010 field campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (16):7983–96. doi:10.5194/acp-13-7983-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieger, P., R. Fierz-Schmidhauser, E. Weingartner, and U. Baltensperger. 2013. Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: Results from different European sites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (21):10609–31. doi:10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar