Understanding the influence of atomizing power on electronic cigarette aerosol size and inhalation dose estimation

References

• Ali, F. R. M., M. C. Diaz, D. Vallone, M. A. Tynan, J. Cordova, E. L. Seaman, K. F. Trivers, B. A. Schillo, B. Talley, and B. A. King. 2020. E-cigarette unit sales, by product and flavor type—United States, 2014–2020. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69 (37):1313–8. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6937e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baassiri, M., S. Talih, R. Salman, N. Karaoghlanian, R. Saleh, R. El Hage, N. Saliba, and A. Shihadeh. 2017. Clouds and “throat hit”: Effects of liquid composition on nicotine emissions and physical characteristics of electronic cigarette aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (11):1231–9. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1341040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar, R. Z., M. Hua, and P. Talbot. 2015. Puffing topography and nicotine intake of electronic cigarette users. PLoS One. 10 (2):e0117222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belka, M., F. Lizal, J. Jedelsky, M. Jicha, and J. Pospisil. 2017. Measurement of an electronic cigarette aerosol size distribution during a puff. EPJ Web Conf. 143:02006. doi:10.1051/epjconf/201714302006.
   Google Scholar
• Canistro, D., F. Vivarelli, S. Cirillo, C. Babot Marquillas, A. Buschini, M. Lazzaretti, L. Marchi, V. Cardenia, M. T. Rodriguez-Estrada, M. Lodovici, et al. 2017. E-cigarettes induce toxicological effects that can raise the cancer risk. Sci. Rep. 7 (1):2028. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02317-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CORESTA 2017. CORESTA recommended method N° 81. In 2015 collaborative study for determination of glycerin, propylene glycol, water and nicotine in collected aerosol of e-cigarettes. Paris, France: CORESTA E-Cigarette Task Force.
   Google Scholar
• Dibaji, S. A. R., B. Oktem, L. Williamson, J. DuMond, T. Cecil, J. P. Kim, S. Wickramasekara, M. Myers, and S. Guha. 2022. Characterization of aerosols generated by high-power electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS): Influence of atomizer, temperature and PG:VG ratios. PLoS One. 17 (12):e0279309. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hellani, A., R. Salman, R. El-Hage, S. Talih, N. Malek, R. Baalbaki, … N. A. Saliba. 2018. Nicotine and carbonyl emissions from popular electronic cigarette products: Correlation to liquid composition and design characteristics. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 20 (2):215–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Eurobarometer 429: Attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco and electronic cigarettes. Brussels, Belgium: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Eurobarometer 506: Attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco and electronic cigarettes. Brussels, Belgium: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, E. L., L. Queimado, J. Wang, J. L. Regens, and D. L. Johnson. 2018. Electronic cigarette power affects count concentration and particle size distribution of vaping aerosol. PLoS One. 13 (12):e0210147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillman, I. G., K. A. Kistler, E. W. Stewart, and A. R. Paolantonio. 2016. Effect of variable power levels on the yield of total aerosol mass and formation of aldehydes in e-cigarette aerosols. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 75:58–65. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helen, G. S., K. C. Ross, D. A. Dempsey, C. M. Havel, P. Jacob, and N. L. Benowitz. 2016. Nicotine delivery and vaping behavior during ad libitum e-cigarette access. Tob. Regul. Sci. 2 (4):363–76. doi:10.18001/TRS.2.4.8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinds, W. C., and Y. Zhu. 2022. Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, ISBN 978-11-1949-404-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebrethsen, B. J., S. K. Cole, and S. L. Alderman. 2012. Electronic cigarette aerosol particle size distribution measurements. Inhal. Toxicol. 24 (14):976–84. doi:10.3109/08958378.2012.744781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiation Protection. 1994. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. Publication 66. Ottawa, Canada: ICRP.
   Google Scholar
• Issakhov, A., and Y. Zhandaulet. 2019. Numerical simulation of thermal pollution zones’ formations in the water environment from the activities of the power plant. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 13 (1):279–99. doi:10.1080/19942060.2019.1584126.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., G. Kong, R. Wu, M. E. Morean, D. R. Davis, D. R. Camenga, D. A. Cavallo, K. W. Bold, P. Simon, and S. Krishnan-Sarin. 2020. E-cigarette devices used on school grounds. Addict. Behav. 110:106516. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, D. B., and W. Li. 2021. Particle size measurement of electronic cigarette aerosol with a cascade impactor. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55 (2):205–14. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1849536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khouja, J. N., S. F. Suddell, S. E. Peters, A. E. Taylor, and M. R. Munafò. 2020. Is e-cigarette use in non-smoking young adults associated with later smoking? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob. Control. 30 (1):8–15. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. Korea Health Statistics 2014. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI-2)
   Google Scholar
• Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. Korea Health Statistics 2019. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VIll-1)
   Google Scholar
• Lampos, S., E. Kostenidou, K. Farsalinos, Z. Zagoriti, A. Ntoukas, K. Dalamarinis, P. Savranakis, G. Lagoumintzis, and K. Poulas. 2019. Real-time assessment of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes emissions: Aerosol size distributions, mass and number concentrations. Toxics 7 (3):45. doi:10.3390/toxics7030045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechasseur, A., S. Altmejd, N. Turgeon, G. Buonanno, L. Morawska, D. Brunet, C. Duchaine, and M. C. Morissette. 2019. Variations in coil temperature/power and e‐liquid constituents change size and lung deposition of particles emitted by an electronic cigarette. Physiol. Rep. 7 (10):e14093. doi:10.14814/phy2.14093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. S., R. F. LeBouf, Y. S. Son, P. Koutrakis, and D. C. Christiani. 2017. Nicotine, aerosol particles, carbonyls and volatile organic compounds in tobacco-and menthol-flavored e-cigarettes. Environ. Health 16 (1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0249-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, Y. O., J. M. Nonnemaker, B. Bradfield, E. C. Hensel, and R. J. Robinson. 2018. Examining daily electronic cigarette puff topography among established and nonestablished cigarette smokers in their natural environment. Nicotine Tob. Res. 20 (10):1283–8. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, C. A., I. K. Sundar, R. M. Watson, A. Elder, R. Jones, D. Done, R. Kurtzman, D. J. Ossip, R. Robinson, S. McIntosh, et al. 2015. Environmental health hazards of e-cigarettes and their components: Oxidants and copper in e-cigarette aerosols. Environ. Pollut. 198:100–7. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., A. E. Burns, L. N. Tran, K. A. Abellar, M. Poindexter, X. Li, A. K. Madl, K. E. Pinkerton, and T. B. Nguyen. 2021. Impact of e-liquid composition, coil temperature, and puff topography on the aerosol chemistry of electronic cigarettes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 34 (6):1640–54. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, A. A., M. M. Hiler, E. K. Soule, C. P. Ramôa, N. V. Karaoghlanian, T. Lipato, A. B. Breland, A. L. Shihadeh, and T. Eissenberg. 2016. Effects of electronic cigarette liquid nicotine concentration on plasma nicotine and puff topography in tobacco cigarette smokers: A preliminary report. Nicotine Tob. Res. 18 (5):720–3. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martuzevicius, D., T. Prasauskas, A. Setyan, G. O'Connell, X. Cahours, R. Julien, and S. Colard. 2019. Characterization of the spatial and temporal dispersion differences between exhaled e-cigarette mist and cigarette smoke. Nicotine Tob. Res. 21 (10):1371–7. doi:10.1093/ntr/nty121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, T. R., P. K. Hopke, J. Zhao, and S. Babaian. 2012. Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality. Inhal. Toxicol. 24 (12):850–7. doi:10.3109/08958378.2012.724728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikheev, V. B., M. C. Brinkman, C. A. Granville, S. M. Gordon, and P. I. Clark. 2016. Real-time measurement of electronic cigarette aerosol size distribution and metals content analysis. Nicotine Tob. Res. 18 (9):1895–902. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikheev, V. B., S. S. Buehler, M. C. Brinkman, C. A. Granville, T. E. Lane, A. Ivanov, K. M. Cross, and P. I. Clark. 2020. The application of commercially available mobile cigarette topography devices for e-cigarette vaping behavior measurements. Nicotine Tob. Res. 22 (5):681–8. doi:10.1093/ntr/nty190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, F. J., B. Asgharian, J. D. Schroeter, and O. T. Price. 2016. Improvements and additions to the Multiple Path Particle Dosimetry model. J. Aerosol Sci. 99:14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Omaiye, E. E., K. J. McWhirter, W. Luo, P. A. Tierney, J. F. Pankow, and P. Talbot. 2019. High concentrations of flavor chemicals are present in electronic cigarette refill fluids. Sci. Rep. 9 (1):1–9. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39550-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmisani, J., A. Di Gilio, L. Palmieri, C. Abenavoli, M. Famele, R. Draisci, and G. de Gennaro. 2019. Evaluation of second-hand exposure to electronic cigarette vaping under a real scenario: Measurements of ultrafine particle number concentration and size distribution and comparison with traditional tobacco smoke. Toxics 7 (4):59. doi:10.3390/toxics7040059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaefstathiou, E., S. Bezantakos, M. Stylianou, G. Biskos, and A. Agapiou. 2020. Comparison of particle size distributions and volatile organic compounds exhaled by e-cigarette and cigarette users. J. Aerosol Sci. 141:105487. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourchez, J., S. Parisse, G. Sarry, S. Perinel-Ragey, J. M. Vergnon, A. Clotagatide, and N. Prévot. 2018. Impact of power level and refill liquid composition on the aerosol output and particle size distribution generated by a new-generation e-cigarette device. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 52 (4):359–69. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1422857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratte, P., S. Cosandey, and C. Goujon-Ginglinger. 2016. A scattering methodology for droplet sizing of e-cigarette aerosols. Inhal. Toxicol. 28 (12):537–45. doi:10.1080/08958378.2016.1224956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prévôt, N., F. de Oliveira, S. Perinel-Ragey, T. Basset, J. M. Vergnon, and J. Pourchez. 2017. Nicotine delivery from the refill liquid to the aerosol via high-power e-cigarette device. Sci. Rep. 7 (1):2592. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03008-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamurthi, D., C. Chau, and R. K. Jackler. 2019. JUUL and other stealth vaporisers: Hiding the habit from parents and teachers. Tob. Control 28 (6):610–6. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsma, M. B., L. S. Flor, E. C. Mullany, V. Gupta, S. I. Hay, and E. Gakidou. 2021. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and initiation among young people in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. Lancet. Public Health. 6 (7):e472–e481. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00102-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters 2016. E-cigarette users view smoke-free areas as okay for vaping. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2016/09/22/ecigarette-smoke-free-areas-okay-vaping/
   Google Scholar
• Ruprecht, A. A., C. De Marco, A. Saffari, P. Pozzi, R. Mazza, C. Veronese, G. Angellotti, E. Munarini, A. C. Ogliari, D. Westerdahl, et al. 2017. Environmental pollution and emission factors of electronic cigarettes, heat-not-burn tobacco products, and conventional cigarettes. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (6):674–84. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1300231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoren, C., K. Hummel, and H. Vries. 2017. Electronic cigarette use: Comparing smokers, vapers, and dual users on characteristics and motivational factors. Tob. Prev. Cessation 3 (April):8. doi:10.18332/tpc/69392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schripp, T., D. Markewitz, E. Uhde, and T. Salthammer. 2013. Does e‐cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? Indoor Air. 23 (1):25–31. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00792.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, Y., G. Mainelis, C. Delnevo, O. A. Wackowski, S. Schwander, and Q. Meng. 2020. Investigating e-cigarette particle emissions and human airway depositions under various e-cigarette-use conditions. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 33 (2):343–52. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneji, S., J. L. Barrington-Trimis, T. A. Wills, A. M. Leventhal, J. B. Unger, L. A. Gibson, J. Yang, B. A. Primack, J. A. Andrews, R. A. Miech, et al. 2017. Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 171 (8):788–97. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosnowski, T. R., and K. Kramek-Romanowska. 2016. Predicted deposition of e-cigarette aerosol in the human lungs. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 29 (3):299–309. doi:10.1089/jamp.2015.1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., A. C. Ranpara, M. A. Virji, and R. F. LeBouf. 2022. Influence of E-Liquid Humectants, Nicotine, and Flavorings on Aerosol Particle Size Distribution and Implications for Modeling Respiratory Deposition. Front. Public Health 10:782068. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.782068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundahl, M., E. Berg, and M. Svensson. 2017. Aerodynamic particle size distribution and dynamic properties in aerosols from electronic cigarettes. J. Aerosol Sci. 103:141–50. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talih, S., R. Salman, R. El-Hage, N. Karaoghlanian, A. El-Hellani, N. Saliba, and A. Shihadeh. 2020. Effect of free-base and protonated nicotine on nicotine yield from electronic cigarettes with varying power and liquid vehicle. Sci. Rep. 10 (1):16263. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73385-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansickel, A. R., J. S. Edmiston, Q. Liang, C. Duhon, C. Connell, D. Bennett, and M. Sarkar. 2018. Characterization of puff topography of a prototype electronic cigarette in adult exclusive cigarette smokers and adult exclusive electronic cigarette users. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 98:250–6. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werley, M. S., J. H. Miller, IV, D. B. Kane, C. S. Tucker, W. J. McKinney, Jr, and M. J. Oldham. 2016. Prototype e-cigarette and the capillary aerosol generator (CAG) comparison and qualification for use in subchronic inhalation exposure testing. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50 (12):1284–93. doi:10.1080/02786826.2016.1219017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., and P. Talbot. 2019. Design features in multiple generations of electronic cigarette atomizers. IJERPH. 16 (16):2904. doi:10.3390/ijerph16162904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yingst, J. M., C. Lester, S. Veldheer, S. I. Allen, P. Du, and J. Foulds. 2019. E-cigarette users commonly stealth vape in places where e-cigarette use is prohibited. Tob. Control. 28 (5):493–7. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T., S. Shu, Q. Guo, and Y. Zhu. 2016. Effects of design parameters and puff topography on heating coil temperature and mainstream aerosols in electronic cigarettes. Atmos. Environ. 134:61–9. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z., M. Zhang, J. Wu, X. Xu, P. Yin, Z. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, X. Zhang, C. Li, et al. 2020. E-cigarette use among adults in China: Findings from repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2015–16 and 2018–19. Lancet. Public Health. 5 (12):e639–e649. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30145-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., H. Irshad, W. W. Dye, G. Wu, C. S. Tellez, and S. A. Belinsky. 2021. Voltage and e-liquid composition affect nicotine deposition within the oral cavity and carbonyl formation. Tob. Control. 30 (5):485–91. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar