Exploring the Factor Structure of a Recovery Assessment Measure among Substance-Abusing Youth

REFERENCES

• Best, D., J. Gow, T. Knox, A. Taylor, T. Groshkova, and W. White. 2012. Mapping the recovery stories of drinkers and drug users in Glasgow: Quality of life and its associations with measures of recovery capital. Drug and Alcohol Review 31 (3): 334–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33: 221–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buja, A., and N. Eyuboglu 1992. Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 27: 509–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciolaa, J. S., A. I. Alterman, D. DePhilippisb, M. L. Drapkin, C. Valadez, N. C. Falae, D. Oslinb, and J. R. McKay. 2013. Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 44: 256–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. 2010. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online]. http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html youth=10-24 Accessed March 2, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chavarria, J., E. B. Stevens, L. A. Jason, and J. R. Ferrari. 2012. The effects of self-regulation and self-efficacy on substance use abstinence. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 30: 422–32. doi:10.1080/07347324.2012.718960
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho, S.-J., F. Li, and D. Bandalos. 2009. Accuracy of the parallel analysis procedure with polychoric correlations. Educational and Psychological Measurement 69: 748–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P. W., D. Giffort, F. Rashid, M. Leary, and I. Okeke. 1999. Recovery as a psychological construct. Community Mental Health Journal 35: 231–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan, P. W., M. Salzer, R. O. Ralph, Y. Sangster, and L. Keck. 2004. Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin 30: 1035–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. L., Y.-F. Chan, and R. R. Funk. 2006. Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. American Journal on Addictions 15: 80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiClemente, C. C., J. P. Carbonari, R. P. Montgomery, and S. O. Hughes. 1994. The alcohol abstinence self-efficacy scale. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 55 (2): 141–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiClemente, C. C., S. K. Fairhurst, and N. A. Piotrowski. 1995. Self-efficacy and addictive behaviors. In J. Maddux, Ed., Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment, 109–41. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, S. K., J. W. Salmon, S. Z. Zhao, B. L. Lambert, P. R. Gore, and K. Conrad. 2001. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clinical Therapeutics 23: 1080–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffort, D., A. Schmook, C. Woody, C. Vollendorf, and M. Gervain. 1995. Construction of a scale to measure consumer recovery. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Glorfeld, L. W. 1995. An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement 55: 377–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, R., M. D. Anglin, R. Beattie, C. A. Ong, and D. C. Glik. 2012a. Perceptions of chronicity and recovery among youth in treatment for substance use problems. Journal of Adolescent Health 51: 144–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, R., M. D. Anglin, R. Beattie, C. A. Ong, and D. C. Glik. 2012b. Understanding recovery barriers: Youth perceptions about substance use relapse. American Journal of Health Behavior 36 (5): 602–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales, R., M. D. Anglin, D. C. Glik, and C. Zavalza. 2013. Perceptions about recovery needs and drug-avoidance recovery behaviors among youth in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 45 (4): 297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshkova, T., D. Best, and W. White. 2013. The assessment of recovery capital: Properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug and Alcohol Review 32(2): 187–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, C. M., and J. H. Zahniser. 1994. Empirical correction of seven myths about schizophrenia with implications for treatment. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 90 (s384): 140–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. 1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30: 179–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser, Y. I., and M. D. Anglin. 2011. Addiction treatment and recovery careers. In Addiction recovery management: Theory, research and practice, current clinical psychiatry, eds. J. F. Kelly and W. L. White. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R., and S. J. Allen. 1987. An empirical comparison of alternative methods for principal component extraction. Journal of Business Research 15: 173–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. G., and R. G. Montanelli. 1975. An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 10: 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminer, Y., and M. Godley. 2010. From assessment reactivity to aftercare for adolescent substance abuse: Are we there yet? Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 19 (3): 577–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet, A. B. 2011. The case for considering quality of life in addiction research and clinical practice. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 6 (1): 44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laudet, A. B., and W. L. White. 2008. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Substance Use & Misuse 43 (1): 27–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, H., A. Morrison, R. Byrne, and E. Hodson. 2012. Recovery from psychosis: A user informed review of self-report instruments for measuring recovery. Journal of Mental Health 21: 192–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaught, M., P. Caputi. L. G. Oades, and F. P. Deane 2007. Testing the validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale using an Australian sample. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 41 (5): 450–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundfrom, D. J., D. G. Shaw, and T. L. Ke. 2005. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing 5 (2): 159–68.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. P. 2000. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32: 396–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salyers, M., H. B. Bosworth, J. W. Swanson, J. Lamb-Pagone, and F. C. Osher. 2000. Reliability and validity of the SF-12 Health Survey among people with severe mental illness. Medical Care 38: 1141–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzer, M. S., and E. Brusilovskiy. 2014. Advancing recovery science: Reliability and validity properties of the recovery assessment scale. Psychiatric Services 65 (4): 442–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2011. Working definition of recovery. http://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/201112220300 accessed December 2, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., C. A. Eaton, and J. L. Fava. 2000. Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy, eds. R. D. Goffin and E. Helmes. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J. E. J., M. Kosinski, and B. Gandek. 2001. SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, UK: Quality Metric.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, E. A., J. D. Hawkins, and R. F. Catalano. 1988. Choosing drug use measures for treatment outcome studies: The influence of measurement approach on treatment results. Substance Use & Misuse 23 (8): 851–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, W., and W. Cloud. 2008. Recovery capital: A primer for addictions professionals. Counselor 9: 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• White, W. L. 2007. Addiction recovery: Its definition and conceptual boundaries. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (3): 229–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C. H., S. Osborn-Popp, S. DiGangi, and A. Jannasch-Pennell. 2007. Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch Modeling, Parallel Analysis, and TETRAD. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 12. Available online at http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=14. Accessed March 2, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., and W. F. Velicer. 1986. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin 99: 432–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar