The Role of Companionship and Conflict in Perceptions of a Friend’s Heavy Alcohol and Marijuana Use

References

• Akers, R. L., M. D. Krohn, L. Lanza-Kaduce, and M. Radosevich. 1979. Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review 44:636–55. doi:10.2307/2094592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J. H., IV, C. J. Rebellon, and R. C. Meldrum. 2016. Can item-level error correlations correct for projection bias in perceived peer deviance measures? A research note. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 32:89–102. doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9255-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J. H., IV, J. Stogner, and B. L. Miller. 2013. Binge drinking, marijuana use, and friendships: The relationship between similar and dissimilar usage and friendship quality. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 45:218–26. doi:10.1080/02791072.2013.803646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J. H., IV, and J. T. Ward. 2014. Beyond projection: Specifying the types of peer delinquency misperception at the item and scale levels. Deviant Behavior 35:555–80. doi:10.1080/01639625.2013.863098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman, J. H., IV, J. T. N. Young, J. M. Baldwin, and R. C. Meldrum. 2014. Specifying the sources of misperceptions of peer deviance: A tale of two levels. Criminal Justice and Behavior 41:91–113. doi:10.1177/0093854813496998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendgen, M., D. Markiewicz, A. B. Doyle, and W. M. Bukowski. 2001. The relations between friendship quality, ranked-friendship preference and adolescents’ behavior with their friends. Merrill Palmer Quarterly 47:395–415. doi:10.1353/mpq.2001.0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski, W. M., B. Hoza, and M. Boivin. 1994. Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 11:471–84. doi:10.1177/0265407594113011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and B. Blaylock. 1963. Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 67:636–40. doi:10.1037/h0045531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L., and D. A. Kashy. 2002. Estimating actor, partner and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships 9:327–42. doi:10.1111/pere.2002.9.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, D. S., D. Huizinga, and S. S. Ageton. 1985. Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. A., and K. E. Bauman. 1988. Influence and selection in the friend-adolescent relationship: Findings from studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18:289–314. doi:10.1111/jasp.1988.18.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, P. C., S. A. Cernkovich, and M. D. Pugh. 1986. Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology 91:1170–202. doi:10.1086/228390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, P. C., R. A. Lonardo, W. D. Manning, and M. A. Longmore. 2010. Adolescent romance and delinquency: A further exploration of Hirschi’s cold and brittle relationships hypothesis. Criminology 48:919–46. doi:10.1111/crim.2010.48.issue-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., and T. Hirschi. 1990. A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. J., and M. W. Fraser. 1985. The social networks of street drug users: A comparison of competing propositions of control and cultural deviance theories. Social Work Research and Abstracts 21:3–12. doi:10.1093/swra/21.1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschi, T., and M. R. Gottfredson. 1993. Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30:47–54. doi:10.1177/0022427893030001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B. 1973. Adolescent marihuana use: Role of parents and peers. Science 181:1067–70. doi:10.1126/science.181.4104.1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B. 1978a. Homophily, selection and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology 84:427–36. doi:10.1086/226792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B. 1978b. Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 36:306–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B. 1996. The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. Journal of Drug Issues 26:289–315. doi:10.1177/002204269602600202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B., and M. Davies. 1991. Friendship networks, intimacy and illicit drug use in young adulthood: A comparison of two competing theories. Criminology 29:441–69. doi:10.1111/crim.1991.29.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., D. A. Kashy, and W. L. Cook. 2006. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D., J. L. Massey, and M. Zielinski. 1988. Role overlap, network multiplexity, and adolescent deviant behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly 51:346–56. doi:10.2307/2786761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, M. D., and T. P. Thornberry. 1993. Network theory: A model for understanding drug abuse for African American and Hispanic youth. In Drug abuse among minority youth: Methodological issues and recent research advances, ed. by M. R. De La Rosa and J. R. Adrados. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, J. M., and A. R. Piquero. 2010. On the relationship between co-offending network redundancy and offending versatility. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47:63–90. doi:10.1177/0022427809348905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, R. C., J. T. N. Young, and F. M. Weerman. 2009. Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: Implications of measurement for theoretical significance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 46:353–76. doi:10.1177/0022427809335171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb, T. M. 1961. The acquaintance process. New York, NY: Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Rebellon, C. J., and K. L. Modecki. 2014. Accounting for projection bias in models of delinquent peer influence: The utility and limits of latent variable approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 30:163–86. doi:10.1007/s10940-013-9199-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saferstein, J. A., G. J. Neimeyer, and C. L. Hagans. 2005. Attachment as a predictor of friendship qualities in college youth. Social Behavior and Personality 33:767–76. doi:10.2224/sbp.2005.33.8.767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, A., J. M. Stogner, and B. L. Miller. 2014. Perception vs. reality: An investigation of the misperceptions concerning the extent of peer novel drug use. Journal of Drug Education 43:97–120.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. F. 1997. Poverty, ethnicity, and violent crime. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, M. 2002. Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, H., J. E. Lee, M. Kuo, M. Seibring, T. F. Nelson, and H. Lee. 2002. Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health college alcohol study surveys: 1993–2001. Journal of American College Health 50:203–17. doi:10.1080/07448480209595713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, H., and T. F. Nelson. 2008. What we have learned from the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study: Focusing attention on college student alcohol consumption and the environmental conditions that promote it. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 69:481–90. doi:10.15288/jsad.2008.69.481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerman, F. M., and W. H. Smeenk. 2005. Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology 43:499–524. doi:10.1111/crim.2005.43.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiecko, F. M. 2010. Research note: Assessing the validity of college samples: Are students really that different? Journal of Criminal Justice 38:1186–90. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windle, M. 1994. A study of friendship characteristics and problem behaviors among middle adolescents. Child Development 65:1764–77. doi:10.2307/1131292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. T. N., J. C. Barnes, R. C. Meldrum, and F. M. Weerman. 2011. Assessing and explaining misperceptions of peer delinquency. Criminology 49:599–63. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00232.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. T. N., C. J. Rebellon, J. C. Barnes, and F. M. Weerman. 2014. Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology 52:60–86. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar