Cultural Bias in WISC Subtest Items: A Response to Judge Grady's Suggestion in Relation to the PASE Case

References

• Anastasi, A. Psychological testing (4e). New York: Macmillan, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Angoff, W. H., & Ford, F. F. Inter-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973, 10, 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneklev, B. L. Data related to the question of bias in standardized testing. Tacoma, WA: Washington Office of Education, Tacoma Public Schools, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, G., Jr. An investigation of the item ordering of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test by sex and rate. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Cardall, C., & Coffman, W. E. A method for comparing the performance of different groups on the items in a test. Research Bulletin: 64–61. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Columbia Broadcasting System. The IQ myth. Special Report. April 22, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Durovic, J. J. Definitions of test bias: A taxonomy and an illustration of an alternative model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of New York at Albany, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Eells, K. Intelligence and cultural differences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. F. Legal opinions on the suit: Parents in Action on Special Education et al. v. Joseph P. Hannon et al. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, July, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. R., & Draper, J. F. Exploratory studies of bias in achievement tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, 1972. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 070 794).
   Google Scholar
• Helmstadter, G. C. Principles of psychological measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. How biased are culture-loaded tests? Genetic Psychology Monograph, 1974, 90, 185–244.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. Test bias and construct validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 1976, 340–346.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. An examination of culture bias in the Wonderlic Personnel Test. Intelligence, 1977, 1, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, W. A., Van de Riet, V., & White, J. C. A normative sample of intelligence and achievement of Negro elementary school children in the southeastern United States. Monographs of the Society for Research on Child Development, 1963, 28, No. 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M. A study of item bias using item characteristic curves theory. In Y. H. Poortinga (Ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• McGurk, F. C. J. Comparison of the performance of Negro and white high school seniors on cultural and noncultural psychological test questions. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, (Microcard), 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J.R., & Brown, W. C. Racial differences in IQ: Fact or artifact? In C. Senna (Ed.), The Fallacy of IQ. New York: Third World Press, 1973, 56–113.
   Google Scholar
• Miele, F. Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, P. L. The effects of heredity and environment on intelligence test performance in four-and seven-year-old white and Negro sibling pairs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Plake, B. S. A comparison of a statistical and subjective procedure to ascertain item validity: One step in the test validation process. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980, 40, 397–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R. The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: Wiley, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., & Hartlage, L. Comparison of WISC and WISC-R regression line for academic prediction with black and with white referred children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 589–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reschly, D., & Sabers, D. Analysis of test bias in four groups with regression definition. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979, 16, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, J. The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 919–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, J., & Miille, M. P. W. Accuracy of judgments of WISC-R item difficulty for minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 249–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuneman, J. D. A posteriori analyses of biased items. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. Definition of bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: THe Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. L. Abuses and misuses in testing black children. Counseling Psychologist, 1971, 2, 62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., Mead, R. J., & Draba, R. Detecting and correcting test item bias with a logistic response model (Research Memorandum No. 22). Chicago: Statistical Laboratory, Department of Education, University of Chicago, 1976.
   Google Scholar