Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading Fluency: A Confirmatory Analysis of its Relation to Reading

REFERENCES

• Allen, D. (1989). Periodic and annual reviews and decisions to terminate special education services. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 184–203). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnine, D., & Silbert, J. (1979). Direct instruction reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, V. L. (1989). Reading fluency: An examination of its role in the reading process. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Marston, D., Shinn, M. R., & Tindal. G. (1983). Oral reading fluency: A simple datum for scaling reading disability. Topics in Learning and Learning Disability, 2, 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P., & Wesson, C. (1984). How to write effective data-based IEPs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16, 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• De Soto, J. L., & De Soto, C. B. (1983). Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 116–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffelmeyer, F. A. (1983). Response to Fuchs, Fuchs, and Deno. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 370–371.
   Google Scholar
• Fassinger, R. E. (1987). Use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 425–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. (1989). Evaluating solutions: Monitoring progress and revising intervention plans. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 155–183). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1981). The relationship between curriculum-based mastery measures and standardized achievement tests in reading (57). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1984). Criterion-referenced assessment without measurement: How accurate for special education. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Tindal. G. (1986). Effects of mastery learning procedures on student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 286–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Shinn, M. R. (1989). Writing CBM IEP Objectives. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 132–154). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Tindal, G., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M. R., Deno, S. L., & Germann, G. (1983). Technical adequacy of basal readers' mastery tests: Holt basic series (130). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Germann, G., & Tindal, G. (1985). An application of curriculum based assessment: The use of direct and repeated measurement. Exceptional Children, 52, 244–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golinkoff, R. M. (1975). A comparison of reading comprehension processes in good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 624–659.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1986). What's whole in whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, A. W. (1967). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, K. W., & Kaplan, J. S. (1980). Diagnosing basic skills: A handbook for deciding what to teach. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Jager-Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1990). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J., Haynes, M., & Beck, K. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers' comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H., & Allington, R. L. (1983). How sharp is a unicorn's horn? Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 498–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, B., Madden, R., & Gardner, E. F. (1975). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (SDRT). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1985). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., & Hammill, D. (1976). Test of Written Spelling (TWS). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, R. G. (1983). Applying structural modeling to some component processes of reading comprehension development. Journal of Experimental Education, 52, 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L. (1989). Assessment of learners with special needs. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Macmann, G., & Barnett, D. (in press). Redefining the WISC-R: Implications for professional practice and public policy. The Journal of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, D. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What is it and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D., & Deno, S. L. (1982). Implementation of direct and repealed measurement in the school setting (106). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D., Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1981). An analysis of learning trends in simple measures of reading, spelling, and written expression: A longitudinal study. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1988). Curriculum-based assessment: District-level implementation. In J. Graden, J. Zins, & M. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 137–172). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• MECC (Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium). (1983). Utilities III. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, M. D., & Bender, P. M. (1988). Impact of adolescent drug use and social support on problems of young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 64–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, M. L., & Wamre, H. M. (1990). Curriculum-based measurement and developmental reading models: Opportunities for cross-validation. Exceptional Children, 57, 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden-Nord, M. K., & Shinn, M. R. (1991). The range of reading skills within and across general education classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 441–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden-Nord, K., Shinn, M. R., & Good, R. H. (1992). Effects on classroom performance data on general education teachers' willingness to reintegrate mildly handicapped students. School Psychology Review, 21, 138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1976). Hierarchical subskills in reading acquisition process. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Aspects of reading acquisition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J. (1981). Some essentials of decoding. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1, 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Tindal, G., & Spira, D. (1987). Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests? Exceptional Children, 54, 32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Tindal, G., & Stein, S. (1988). Curriculum-based assessment and the identification of mildly handicapped students: A research review. Professional School Psychology, 3, 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1973). Decoding: The great fallacy. In F. Smith (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning: A conceptual framework for teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, W. D. (1989). Curriculum-based reading measures: Are they related to teacher perception of student skill? Unpublished master's thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M. R., Deno, S., & Germann, G. (1983). The technical adequacy of a basal reading series mastery test: The Scott-Foresman reading program (128). Minneapolis: Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M. R., Deno, S., & Germann, G. (1985). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, G., & Larsen, S. (1979). Educational assessment for learning problems: Testing for teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. M. (1973). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. M. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Ysseldyke, J. E., & Marston, D. (1982). A critical analysis of standardized reading tests. School Psychology Review, 11, 257–266.
   Google Scholar