Accuracy in Analysis of Discrepancy Scores: A Nationwide Study of School Psychologists

REFERENCES

• Aiken L. S., West, S. G., Sechrest, L., & Reno, R. R. (1990). Graduate training in statistics, methodology, and measurement in psychology: A survey of PhD programs in North America. American Psychologist, 45, 721–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1981). Special education services for normal children: Better safe than sorry? Exceptional Children, 48, 238–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1987). Questioning discrepancies: Retaking the first steps 20 years later. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 301–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological Testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D., & Clarizio, H. (1988). A comparison of methods for calculating a severe discrepancy. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., & Shepherd, M. J. (1982). Basic measurement proficiency of learning disability specialists. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braden, J. P., & Weiss, L. (1988). Effects of simple difference versus regression discrepancy methods: An empirical study. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. W. (1990). Base rate theory and school psychology. School Psychology Review, 19, 356–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarizio, H. F., & Phillips, S. E. (1989). Defining severe discrepancy in the diagnosis of learning disabilities: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for Learning Disabilities. (1987). Use of discrepancy formulas in the identification of learning disabled individuals. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 245.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. W., & Shepard, L. A. (1983). Specialists' use of tests and clinical judgment in the diagnosis of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, J. (1985). Report to the Mayor's Commission on Special Education and COH Practices in New York City. New York: New York University, Department of Educational Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, G. S., Dyck, N. J., & Holen, M. C. (1979). Objective analysis of achievement-aptitude discrepancies in LD classification. Earning Disability Quarterly, 2, 32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner, E. S. (1989). Errors in decision making: A comparison of school psychologists' interpretations of grade equivalents, percentiles, and deviation IQs. School Psychology Review, 18, 51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interagency Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Learning disabilities: A report to the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health & Development, Office of Research Reporting.
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A. (1987). Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Matarazzo, J. D. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological testing: Validation from Binet to the school, clinic, and courtroom. American Psychologist, 45, 999–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. D., King-Sears, P., & Mercer, A. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrell, K. W., & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Critical variables in the learning disabilities identification process. School Psychology Review, 19, 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R. (1981). The fallacy of “two years below grade level for age” as a diagnostic criterion for reading disorders. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 350–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, R. P. (1990). Consistency among school psychologists in evaluating discrepancy scores: A preliminary study. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 13, 209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1983). An evaluation of the identification of learning disabled children in Colorado. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 115–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Smith, M. L., & Vojir, C. P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 309–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Office of Education. (1976). Education of handicapped children: Proposed rule-making. Federal Register, 41, 52404–52407.
   Google Scholar
• United States Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children. Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 65082–65085.
   Google Scholar
• Valus, A. (1986). Achievement-potential discrepancy status of students in LD programs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar