7
Views
66
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Efficacy of Peer Tutoring in Reading for Students with Mild Disabilities: A Best-Evidence Synthesis

&
Pages 59-80 | Published online: 22 Dec 2019

REFERENCES

  • Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). School response to reading failure: Instruction for chapter 1 and special education students in grades two, four, and eight. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 530–542.
  • Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman.
  • Brigance, A. H. (1977). The Brigance comprehensive inventory of basic skills (2nd ed.). North Billerica: Curriculum Associates.
  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Achievement. New York: Macmillan.
  • Carlton, M. B., Litton, F. W., & Zinkgraf, S. A. (1985). The effects of an intraclass peer-tutoring program on the sight-word recognition of students who are mildly mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, 23, 74–78.
  • Carnine, D., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1990). Direct Instruction Reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.
  • Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto G. C. (1985–86). Handicapped students as tutors. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 155–164.
  • Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52, 535–542.
  • Devin-Sheehan, L., Feldman, R. S., & Allen, V. L. (1976). Research on children tutoring children: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 46, 355–385.
  • Dunn, L., & Markward, F. (1970). Peabody individual achievement test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Dusek, J. R., & Joseph, G. (1983). The bases of teacher expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 327–346.
  • Educational Resources Information Center. (1990). Thesaurus of ERIC descriptors (12th ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
  • Eiserman, W. D., Shisler, L., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1987). Handicapped students as tutors: A description and integration of three years of research findings. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 11, 215–231.
  • Elliott, M. (1991). A replication and analysis of classwide peer tutoring effects with high socioeconomic status fourth grade students. Unpublished dissertation, University of Kansas.
  • Elliott, M., Hughes, V., & Delquadri, J. (1984, May). Experimental validation and field testing of instructional packages that increase “opportunity to respond.” In J. Delquadri (Chair), Applications of behavioral instruction models: Issues influencing adoption and use in public schools. Symposium presented at the Tenth Annual Convention of the Association of Behavior Analysis, Nashville, TN.
  • Ellson, D. G. (1976). Tutoring. In N. Gage (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods (pp. 130–165). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Epstein, L. (1978). The effects of intraclass peer tutoring on the vocabulary development of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 63–66.
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. (1989). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 21, 513–516.
  • Gardner, E. J. Rudman, H. C., Karlsen, B., & Merwin, J. C. (1982). Stanford achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
  • Gelzheiser, L. M., & Meyers, J. (1991). Reading instruction by classroom, remedial, and resource room teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 512–526.
  • Gerber, M., & Kauffman, J. M. (1981). Peer tutoring in academic setting. In P. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of peers as behavior change agents (pp. 155–188). New York: Plenum.
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(1), 3–8.
  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., & Kamps, D. (1990). Teacher versus peer-mediated instruction: A review of educational advantages and disadvantages. In M. Foot, F. Morgan, & R. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 177–205). Sussex, England: Willey.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH-Merrill.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–383.
  • Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1985). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods. New York: Longman
  • Harrison, G. V. (1982). Beginning reading: A professional guide for the lay tutor. Blanding, UT: METRA.
  • Haynes, M. C., & Jenkins, J. R. (1986). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 161–190.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimating effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490–499.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1983). Clustering estimates of effect magnitude from independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 563–573.
  • Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J. D., Haynes, M. C., & Beck, K. (1987). Does passive learning account for disabled readers' comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69–75.
  • Jenkins, J. R., & Jenkins, L. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17, 1–12.
  • Kalfus, G. R. (1984). Peer mediated intervention: A critical review. Child and Family Therapy, 6, 17–43.
  • Kane, B. J., & Alley, G. R. (1980). A peer-tutored, instructional management program in computational mathematics for incarcerated, learning disabled juvenile delinquents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 39–42.
  • Karlsen, B., Madden, R., & Gardner, E. F. (1977). Stanford diagnostic reading test. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • King, R. T. (1982). Learning from a PAL. The Reading Teacher, 35(6), 682–685.
  • Lamport, K. C. (1982). The effect of inverse tutoring on reading disabled students in public school settings. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 729. (University Microfilms No. 83–15, 707)
  • Leinhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W. W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343–361.
  • Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • MacGinitie, W. H. (1978). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests: Teacher's manual. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Maheady, L., Harper, G. F., & Sacca, M. K. (1988). Peer-mediated instruction: A promising approach to meeting the diverse needs of LD adolescents. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 108–113.
  • Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1992). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. Document submitted to the office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 352)
  • McCracken, S. J. (1979). The effect of a peer tutoring program utilizing data-based instruction on the word recognition and reading comprehension skills of secondary age level handicapped students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40(08–A), 4516. (University Microfilms No. 79–24, 399)
  • Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
  • National Commission of Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Osguthorpe, R., Eiserman, W., Shisler, L., Top, B., & Scruggs, T. E. (1984). Final report (1983–1984): Handicapped children as tutors. Document submitted to the office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 255 018)
  • Osguthorpe, R. T., & Scruggs, T. E. (1986). Special education students as tutors: A review and analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 7(4), 15–26.
  • O'Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O'Shea, D. J. (1987). The effects of repeated reading and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103–109.
  • O'Sullivan, P. J., Ysseldyke, J. E., Christensen, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (1990). Mildly handicapped elementary students' opportunity to learn during reading instruction in mainstream and special education settings. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 131–146.
  • Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
  • Russell, T., & Ford, D. F. (1983). Effectiveness of peer tutors vs. resource teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 436–441.
  • Samuels, S. J. (1987). Information processing abilities and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 18–22.
  • Samuels, S. J., Dahl, P., & Archwatemy, T. (1974). Effects of hypothesis/test training on reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 835–844.
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Richter, L. (1985). Peer tutoring with behaviorally disordered students: Social and academic benefits. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 283–294.
  • Scruggs, T. E., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1986). Tutoring interventions within special education settings: A comparison of cross-age and peer tutoring. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 148–154.
  • Scruggs, T. E., & Richter, L. (1985). Tutoring learning disabled students: A critical review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 286–298.
  • Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Pate, J., & Mathes, P. G. (in press a). Importance of complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
  • Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Mathes, P. G., & Pate, J. (in press b). The effects of explicit teaching and peer-mediated instruction on the reading achievement of learning disabled and low-performing students. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
  • Sindelar, P. T. (1982). The effects of cross-age tutoring on the comprehension skills of remedial reading students. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 199–206.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: How has it been used? Educational Researcher, 13, 6–15, 24–27.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–11.
  • Slosson, R. L. (1963). Slosson oral reading test. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
  • Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433–454.
  • Top, B. L., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1985). The effects of reverse role tutoring on reading achievement and self-concept. In R. T. Osguthorpe, W. D. Eiserman, L., Shisler, B. L. Top, & T. E. Scruggs. Handicapped children as tutors: Final report (1984–1985). Document submitted to the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 267 545)
  • Top, B. L., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1987). Reverse-role tutoring: The effects of handicapped students tutoring regular class students. Elementary School Journal, 87, 413–423.
  • Topping, K. (1988). The peer tutoring handbook: Promoting co-operative learning. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Press.
  • Wallace, G., Larsen, S. C., & Elksnin, L. A. (1992). Educational assessment of learning problems: Testing for teaching (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. MacAllen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.