The Use of the Hand Test with Children and Adolescents: A Review

REFERENCES

• Alpert, J. L. (1990). Introduction to special section on clinical intervention in child sexual abuse. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 323–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A. (1986). Evolving concepts of test validation. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andrea, R. K. (1971). The use of the Hand Test with neurologically handicapped children. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Akron.
   Google Scholar
• Azcarate, E., & Gutierrez, M. (1969). Differentiation of institutional adjustment of juvenile delinquents with the Hand Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 200–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. (1987). Questionnaires and checklists. In C. L. Frame & J. L. Matson (Eds.), Handbook of assessment in childhood psychopathology: Applied issues in differential diagnosis and treatment evaluation (pp. 79–105). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Bodden, J. L. (1984). The Hand Test. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Test critiques: Volume I(pp. 315–321). Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.
   Google Scholar
• Breidenbaugh, B., Brozovich, R., & Matheson, L. (1974). The Hand Test and other aggression indicators in emotionally disturbed children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 332–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricklin, B., Piotrowski, Z. A., & Wagner, E. E. (1962). The Hand Test: With special reference to the prediction of overt aggressive behavior. In M. Harrower (Ed.), American lecture series in psychology. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, L. P. (1968). Other projective techniques. In A. I. Rabin (Ed.), Projective techniques in personality assessment: A modem introduction (pp. 461–520). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castle, S. R., & Stoner, S. B. (1989). Age and sex differences in the responses of adolescents to the Hand Test. Psychological Reports, 65, 939–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1968). Manual for the High School Personality Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality & Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1969). Validation of educational measures. In P. H. DuBois (Ed.), Proceedings of the invitational conference on testing problems (pp. 35–52). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R. E. Linn (Ed.), Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy (pp. 147–171). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (1986). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Volume 1: Basic foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D. (1990). Early and long-term effects of child sexual abuse: An update. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 325–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. I., & Cole, C. L. (1987). Conduct problems. In C. L. Frame & J. L. Matson (Eds.), Handbook of assessment in childhood psychopathology: Applied issues in differential diagnosis and treatment evaluation (pp. 251–270). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, D. S., & Fuller, G. B. (1983). Current practices in the assessment of personality and behavior by school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 12, 240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, D. S., Teslow, C. J., & Fuller, G. B. (1981). The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12, 696–706.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenroth, M. J., Fowler, C., Sivec, H. J., & Waehler, C. A. (1994). Hand Test and MMPI-2 concurrent validity: Measurement of psychopathology Assessment, 1, 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenroth, M. J., & Sivec, H. J. (1990). Relationships between Hand Test variables and maladjustment in school children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 344–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, T. O. (1976). Relationship among Hand Test variables and behavioral ratings of children.
   Google Scholar
• Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 2509B.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, T. O. (1978). The Hand Test: Fifteen years later. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, J. B., Dubes, R., & Muir, S. (1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. T. (1975). A comparison of Hand Test responses of aggressive and nonaggressive black adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 1736A.
   Google Scholar
• Knoff, H. M. (1983a). Guest editor's comment: Projective/personality assessment in the schools. School Psychology Review, 12, 375.
   Google Scholar
• Knoff, H. M. (1983b). Personality assessment in the schools: Issues and procedures for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 12, 391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Knoff, H. M. (1983c). Justifying projective/personality assessment in school psychology: A response to Batsche and Peterson. School Psychology Review, 12, 446–451.
   Google Scholar
• Knoff, H. M. (Ed.). (1986). The assessment of child and adolescent personality. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Korchin, S. J., & Schuldberg, D. (1981). The future of clinical assessment. American Psychologist, 36, 1147–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberger, H. R. (1975). The use of the Hand Test with emotionally disturbed children. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Akron, Akron, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Lanyon, R. I., & Goodstein, L. D. (1982). Personality assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lie, N. (1988). Boys who become offenders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 342, 100–110.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. P. (1988). Assessment of personality and behavior problems: Infancy through adolescence. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, M. K. T., & Wagner, E. E. (1983). Validity of the Hand Test for diagnosing organicity in a clinical setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 607–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGiboney, G. W., & Carter, C. (1982). Test-retest reliability of the Hand Test with acting-out adolescent subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 723–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGiboney, G. W., Carter, C., & Jones, M. (1984). Hand Test and the High School Personality Questionnaire: Structural analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 287–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGiboney, G. W., & Huey, W. C. (1982). Hand Test norms for disruptive black adolescent males. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 441–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoura, Y., & Takida, Y. (1972). Hand Test characteristics of Japanese delinquent boys. Japanese Journal of Criminal Psychology, 9, 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J. J., & Carter, D. E. (1991). Comparisons among children's responses to the Hand Test by grade, race, sex, and social class. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 647–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 63, 229–258.
   Google Scholar
• Nace, R. B. (1983). Sex versus age differences in adolescent responses to the Hand Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, O., & Loftus, P. T. (1967). A normative and comparative study of the Hand Test with normal and delinquent children. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 31, 62–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panek, P. E., & Stoner, S. (1979). Test-retest reliability of the Hand Test with normal subjects. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 135–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panek, P. E., & Wagner, E. E. (1979). Relationships between Hand Test variables and mental retardation: A confirmation and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 600–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. W., & Batsche, G. M. (1983). School psychology and projective assessment: A growing incompatibility. School Psychology Review, 12, 440–445.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, M. A., & Wagner, E. E. (1989). Initial effects of sexual abuse on female children as reflected in the Hand Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 761–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, H. (1965). Der Hand-Test als indikator for offen aggressives verhalten bei kindern. Diagnostica, 4, 153–158.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. M., & Dawson, J. G. (1969). Experimental falsification of the Hand Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 204–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivec, H. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., & Wagner, E. E. (1989). Correlations between Hand Test variables and intelligence for public school students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 241–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, S. (1978). Sex differences in responses of children to the Hand Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 759–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, S., & Lundquist, T. (1980). Test-retest reliability of the Hand Test with older adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 217–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, S., & Spencer, B. (1984). Age and sex differences on the Hand Test with children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 598–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waehler, C. A., Rasch, M. A., Sivec, H. J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (1992). Establishing a placement index for behaviorally disturbed children using the Hand Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 537–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E. (1962). Hand Test: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E. (1983). The Hand Test manual (rev. ed.). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E. (1986). Hand Test interpretation for children and adolescents. In A. I. Rabin (Ed.), Projective Techniques for adolescents and children (pp. 279–305). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E., Darbes, A., & Lechowick, T. P. (1972). A validation study of Hand Test Pathology score. Journal of Personality Assessment, 36, 62–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E., & Hawkins, R. (1964). Differentiation of assaultive delinquents with the Hand Test. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 28, 363–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E., Maloney, P., & Wilson, D. G. (1981). Split-half and test-retest Hand Test reliabilities for pathological samples. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 589–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E., Rasch, M. A., & Marsico, D. S. (1990). Hand Test characteristics of severely behavior handicapped children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 802–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. E., Rasch, M. A., & Marsico, D. S. (1991). Hand Test manual supplement: Interpreting child and adolescent responses. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B. (1991). Editor's note: Interscorer agreement in Rorschach research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetsel, H., Shapiro, R. J., & Wagner, E. E. (1967). Prediction of recidivism among juvenile delinquents with the Hand Test. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 31, 69–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar