2
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

School District Testing Policies and Students with Disabilities: A National Survey

Pages 694-703 | Published online: 22 Dec 2019

REFERENCES

  • Chalmers, L. (1991). Classroom modifications for the mainstreamed student with mild handicaps. Intervention in School and Clinic, 27(1), 40–52, 51.
  • Demands for high standards are increasing. (1993). Outcomes, 2(2), p. 3.
  • Friend, M. (1988). Putting consultation into context: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 9(6), 7–13.
  • Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1989). Collaboration as a predictor for success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 69–86.
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement: A methodology for evaluating and improving student programs. Diagnostiqué, 14, 3–13.
  • Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., Lloyd, J. W., & McKinney, J. D. (Eds.). (1988). The regular education initiative [Special Series]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 3–52.
  • Harrington-Lueker, D. (1991). Beyond multiple choice: The push to assess performance. The Executive Educator, 13(4), 20–22.
  • Hintze, J. L. (1990). Number cruncher statistical system. Kaysville, UT: Author.
  • Hocutt, A., Martin, E., & McKinney, J. (1990). Historical and legal context of mainstreaming. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Singh, & A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 17–28). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
  • Jayanthi, M., Bursuck, W. D., & Epstein, M. H. (1992). A working definition of performance assessment. Unpublished manuscript, Educational Research and Services Center, DeKalb, IL.
  • National Center on Educational Outcomes. (1992). State special education outcomes 1991: A report on state activities in the assessment of educational outcomes for students with disabilities. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Pace-Chappell, E. (1985, April). Mainstreamed secondary students and course proficiency testing without modifications. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Anaheim, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 257 296)
  • Paulson, F., Paulson, P., & Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.
  • Putnam, M. L. (1992). The testing practices of mainstream secondary classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 13(5), 11–21.
  • Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1988). Implementing the Regular Education Initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.
  • Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers' perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12(4), 18–27.
  • Shepard, L. A. (1989). Why we need better assessment. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 4–9.
  • Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1983). Asking questions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1986–87). Common Core of Data-Public Education Agency Universe. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Fourteenth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Wood, J. W., & Miederhoff, J. W. (1988). A model for adapting the teacher-made test. The Pointer, 33(1), 7–11.
  • Wood, J. W., Miederhoff, J. W., & Ulschmid, B. (1989). Adapting test construction for mainstreamed social studies students. Social Education, 53, 46–48.
  • Ysseldyke, J., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M. (1992). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Zigmond, N., Levin, E., & Laurie, T. E. (1985). Managing the mainstream: An analysis of teacher attitudes and student performance in mainstream high school programs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 535–541.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.