It Can Be Taught, But It Does Not Develop Naturally: Myths and Realities In Writing Instruction

References

• Alexander, P. (in press). Stages and phases of domain learning: The dynamics of subject-matter knowledge, strategy knowledge, and motivation. In C. Weinstein & B. McCoombs (Eds.), Strategic learning: Skill, will, and self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist, 27, 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associated Press. (1995, December 27). This man give children “Goosebumps” and “Fear Street.” Valdosta Daily Times, p. B1.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1984). Learning about writing from reading. Written Communication, 1, 163–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, B. (1990). What does the term whole language mean? Constructing a definition from the literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 301–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., & Nolen, S. (1995). Integrating low-and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Rogan, L., Brooks, A., Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1996). Preventing handwriting and compositional disability: Training in handwriting fluency and transfer to compositional fluency. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, C. (1991). Reading-writing connections: Using literature as a zone of proximal development. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, R. (1969). English composition. Encyclopedia of educational research. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1990). Interactive learning environments and the teaching of science and mathematics. In M. Gardner, J. Green, F. Reif, A. Schoenfield, A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 112–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, S. (1994). For writers only. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, S., Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., & McVicar, R. (1989). Written language instruction for students with mild handicaps: Is there enough quantity to ensure quality. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, B. (1990). Muggie Maggie. New York: Avon Camelot.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroff, L. (1992). Process-writing teachers' responses to fourth-grade writers' first drafts. Elementary School Journal, 93, 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Strategy instruction in planning: Effects on the writing performance and behavior of students with learning difficulties. Exceptional Children 63, 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst, R. (1989). Monitoring processes in analytic and summary writing. Written Communication, 6, 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C., Garmon, A., Mariage, T., Rozendal, M., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 253–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C., Raphael, T., Anderson, L,. Anthony, H. Steven, D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making writing and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C., Raphael, T., Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational text. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 11, 1846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Markham, L. (1987). Teaching children about revision. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Stamm, C. (1990). Effects of group conferences on first graders' revision in writing. Written Communication, 7, 96–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Teasley, A. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children's writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 424–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching of the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. (1992). I didn't found whole language. The Reading Teacher, 46, 188–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1982). Composition research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 14, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1992). Issues in handwriting instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 25, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1988). Instructional recommendations for teaching writing to exceptional students. Exceptional Children, 54, 506–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994a). Implications on constructivism for teaching writing to students with special needs. Journal of Special Education, 28, 275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994b). The role of self-regulation in the writing process. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 203–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 347–360). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (in press). Whole language and process writing: Does one approach fit all? In J. Lloyd, E. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Loynachan, C. (1996). The Directed Spelling Thinking activity: Application with high frequency words. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 11, 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Loynachan, C., & Harris, K. R. (1993). The Basic Spelling Vocabulary list. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 363–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Miller, L. (197). Spelling research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 12, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C. (1993). Learning disabled and normally achieving students' knowledge of the writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospect from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1994). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration. Journal of Special Education, 28, 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karegianes, M., Pascarella, E., & Pflaum, S. (1980). The effects of peer editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazin, A. (1967). The Paris Review: Writers at work. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing with three methods: Handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Journal of Special Education, 21, 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., Graham, S., Haynes, J., & De La Paz, S. (1996). Spelling checkers and students with learning disabilities: Performance comparisons and impact on spelling. Journal of Special Education, 30, 35–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & Shafer, W. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 278–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, N. (192). Whole language reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: Caught in the cross fire. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (1988). “Functional automaticity” in children's writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5, 306–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meichenbaum, D., & Biemiller, A. (1992). In search of student expertise in the classroom: A metacognitive analysis. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 3–56). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palinscar, A., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 211–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plimpton, G. (1989). The writer's chapbook. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Rankin, J. (1994) More about whole language methods of reading instruction for students at risk for early reading failure. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 157–168.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, M. (1991). A process approach to literacy using dialogue journals and literature logs with second language learners. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safire, W., & Safire, L. (1992). Good advice on writing. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stotsky, S. (1995). The uses and limitations of personal or personalized writing in writing theory, research, and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 758–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, S. (1990). Spelling textbooks: A critical review. Linguistics and Education, 2, 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, S. (1995). What the public wants. Education Update, 37, 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (in press). Becoming a proficient writer: A self-regulatory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
   Google Scholar