150
Views
76
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Skilled Comprehension and Its Development Through Instruction

Pages 448-466 | Published online: 22 Dec 2019

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Adams, M. J., Treiman, R., & Pressley, M. (in press). Reading, writing, and literacy. To appear in I. Sigel & A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4 Child psychology in practice. New York: Wiley.
  • Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
  • Anderson, V. (1992). A teacher development project in transactional strategy instruction for teachers of severely reading-disabled adolescents. Teaching & Teacher Education, 8, 391–403.
  • Anderson, V., & Roit, M. (1993). Planning and implementing collaborative strategy instruction for delayed readers in grades 6–10. Elementary School Journal, 94, 121–137.
  • Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
  • Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297–306.
  • Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81–95.
  • Berkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 161–178.
  • Brainerd, C. J. (1978). Learning research and Piagetian theory. In L. S. Siegel & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical essays on the theory (pp. 69–109). New York: Academic Press.
  • Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. Ill, Cognitive development (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.
  • Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.
  • Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968–979.
  • Brown, R., & Coy-Ogan, L. (1993). The evolution of transactional strategies instruction in one teacher's classroom. Elementary School Journal, 94, 221–233.
  • Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.
  • Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18–37.
  • Christopherson, S. L., Schultz, C. B., & Waern, Y. (1981). The effect of two contextual conditions on recall of a reading passage and on thought processes in reading. Journal of Reading, 24, 573–578.
  • Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.
  • Collins, C. (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading, 34, 510–516.
  • Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M. C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 109–118.
  • DuCharme, C., Earl, J., & Poplin, M. S. (1989). The author model: The constructivist view of the writing process. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 12, 237–242.
  • Duffy, G. G., & Roehler, L. R. (1989). Why strategy instruction is so difficult and what we need to do about it. In C. B. McCormick, G. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 133–154). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347–368.
  • Durkin, D. (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 481–533.
  • Durkin, D. (1981). Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reading series. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347–368.
  • Earthman, E. A. (1989). The lonely, quiet concert: Readers creating meaning from literary texts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Earthman, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers' processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351–384.
  • El-Dinary, P. B., Pressley, M., & Schuder, T. (1992). Becoming a strategies teacher: An observational and interview study of three teachers learning transactional strategies instruction. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 453–462). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
  • Forrest-Pressley, D. L., & Gilles, L. A. (1983). Children's flexible use of strategies during reading. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 133–156). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Gambrell, L. B., & Bales, R. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth-and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 454–464.
  • Gambrell, L. B., & Jawitz, P. B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children's comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 264–273.
  • Gaskins, I. W., Anderson, R. C., Pressley, M., Cunicelli, E. A., & Satlow, E. (1993). Six teachers' dialogue during cognitive process instruction. Elementary School Journal, 93, 277–304.
  • Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of “metacognitive” studies. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 5–8.
  • Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–16.
  • Harris, K. R. (1985). Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues in cognitive-behavioral assessment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 373–390.
  • Harris, K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–404.
  • Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196–205.
  • Idol, L., & Croll, V. J. (1987). Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 214–229.
  • Johns, J. C., & McNamara, L. P. (1980). The SQ3R study technique: A forgotten research target. Journal of Reading, 23, 705–708.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
  • Kucan, L. (1993, December). Uncovering cognitive processes in reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston.
  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
  • Levin, J. R. (1976). What have we learned about maximizing what children can learn? In J. R. Levin & V. L. Allen (Eds.), Cognitive learning in children (pp.). New York: Academic Press.
  • Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1981). Improving children's prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (Eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44–71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Levine, A. (1996). Parents report on America's reading crisis. Parents, 77(10), 63–68.
  • Lytle, S. L. (1982). Exploring comprehension style: A study of twelfth-grade readers' transactions with text [CD-ROM]. Dissertation Abstracts Item: A 43/07, p. 2295, January 1983.
  • Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Martin, V. L., & Pressley, M. (1991). Elaborative-interrogation effects depend on the nature of the question. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 113–119.
  • McKenna, M. C., Ellsworth, R. A., & Kear, D. J. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.
  • Meyers, J., Lytle, S., Palladino, D., Devenpeck, G., & Green, M. (1990).
  • Think-aloud protocol analysis: An investigation of reading comprehension strategies in fourth-and fifth-grade students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 112–127.
  • Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
  • Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialectical constructivism. Developmental Review, 2, 371–384.
  • Nolte, R. Y., & Singer, H. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement. Reading Teacher, 39, 24–31.
  • Oakhill, J. V. (1993). Children's difficulties in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 223–237.
  • Oakhill, J. V., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems. Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106–115.
  • Olshavsky, J. E. (1976-77). Reading as problem solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 654–674.
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
  • Paris, S. G., & Upton, L. R. (1976). Children's memory for inferential relationships in prose. Child Development, 47, 660–668.
  • Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. Elementary School Journal, 88, 151–165.
  • Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. II (pp. 815–860). New York: Longman.
  • Phillips, L. M. (1988). Young readers' inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 193–222.
  • Poplin, M. S. (1988a). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
  • Poplin, M. S. (1988b). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
  • Pressley, M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355–359.
  • Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children's learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research, 47, 586–622.
  • Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J., Almasi, L., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511–554.
  • Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Stein, S., Marks, M. B., & Brown, R. (1992). Good strategy instruction is motivating and interesting. In A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 333–358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pressley, M., Gaskins, I. W., Cunicelli, E. A., Burdick, N. J., Schaub-Matt, M., Lee, D. S., & Powell, N. (1991). Strategy instruction at Benchmark School: A faculty interview study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 19–48.
  • Pressley, M., Gaskins, I. W., Wile, D., Cunicelli, B., & Sheridan, J. (1991). Teaching literacy strategies across the curriculum: A case study at Benchmark School. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction: Fortieth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 219–228). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
  • Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Marks, M. B. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists! Educational Psychology Review, 4, 1–32.
  • Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve memory and comprehension of what is read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.
  • Pressley, M., & Rankin, J. (1994). More about whole language methods of reading instruction for students at-risk for early reading failure. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 157–168.
  • Pressley, M., Rankin, J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96, 363–384.
  • Pressley, M., Schuder, T., SAIL Faculty and Administration, Bergman, J. L, & El-Dinary, P. B. (1992). A researcher-educator collaborative interview study of transactional comprehension strategies instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 231–246.
  • Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta, J., & Echevarria, M. (1996). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade-4/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Rankin, J., Mistretta, J., Yokoi, L., & Ettenberger, S. (1996). The nature of outstanding primary grades literacy instruction. In E. McIntyre & M. Pressley (Eds.), Balanced instruction: Strategies and skills in whole language (pp. 251–276). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
  • Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91–110.
  • Pressley, M., Yokoi, L., Rankin, J., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Mistretta, J. (1997). A survey of the instructional practices of grade-5 teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 145–160.
  • Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. London: Prentice Hall.
  • Roehler, L. R., & Duffy, G. G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265–280). New York: Longman.
  • Rogers, T. (1991). Students as literary critics: The interpretive experiences, beliefs, and processes of ninth-grade students. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 391–423.
  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of nineteen experimental studies. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.
  • Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225–235.
  • Smith, C. B. (Moderator). (1994). Whole language: The debate. Bloomington, IN: ERIC/REC.
  • Squire, J. R. (1964). The responses of adolescents while reading four short stories. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children's comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323–340.
  • Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19,134–146.
  • van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • Weaver, C. (1994). Reading process and practice: From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., Mistretta, J., & Echevarria, M. (1996). Outstanding literacy instruction in first grade: teacher practices and student achievement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Wiener, M., & Cromer, W. (1967). Reading and reading difficulty: A conceptual analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 37, 620–643.
  • Wineberg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495–520.
  • Wood, S. S., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
  • Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinery, P., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: Cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 49–72.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.