Independent Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS): What Does the CAS Measure?

References

• Arbuckle, J. (1997). Amos user's guide 3.6. Chicago: SmallWaters.
   Google Scholar
• Bickley, P. G., Keith, T. Z., Wolfe, L. M. (1995). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities: Test of the structure of intelligence across the life span. Intelligence, 20, 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, N. (1994). Cognitive abilities. Psychological Science, 5, 63–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1995). Review of [Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence]. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 13, 397–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 122–130). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, M. H. (1997). Intelligence testing: Status and trends. American Psychologist, 52, 1038–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, J. P., & Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Cognitive assessment system. Chicago: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Esters, I. G., Ittenbach, R. F., & Han, K. (1997). Today's IQ tests: Are they really better than their historical predecessors? School Psychology Review, 26, 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1994). [Review of Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies]. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 199.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, J. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A. (1996). LISREL issues, debates, and strategies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1994). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of intelligence (pp. 443–451). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive abilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (1995). Amos, EQS, and LISREL for Windows: A comparative review. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, E., & Lansman, M. (1986). Unified model of attention and problem solving. Psychological Review, 93, 446–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittenbach, R. F., Esters, I. G., & Wainer, H. (1997). The history of test development. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 17–31). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1987). Individual differences in mental ability. In J. A. Glover & R. R. Ronning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology (pp. 61–88). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1993). Manual for the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, T. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373–402). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, T. Z. (1999). Structural equation modeling in school psychology. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 78–107). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, T. Z., & Witta, L. (1997). Hierarchical and cross-age confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-III: What does it measure? School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H. (1997). What does the WISC-III measure? Comments on the relationship between intelligence, working memory efficiency, and information processing speed and efficiency. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 110–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., & Weng, L. (1995a). The factor structure of the PASS cognitive tasks: A reexamination of Naglieri et al. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., & Weng, L. (1995b). A reply to the commentary by Naglieri and Das on the factor structure of a battery of PASS cognitive tasks. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, N. M. (1990). Consideration of the Das-Naglieri cognitive assessment system. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 338–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison, (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151–179). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. (1989). Dichotomous factor analysis of symptom data. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 19–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive theory and the Cognitive Assessment System: A new theory-based measure of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 247–267). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., Braden, J., & Gottling, S. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis of the planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) cognitive processing model for a kindergarten sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., Braden, J., & Warrick, P. D. (1991). Planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) cognitive processing as a model for intelligence: A confirmatory study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1995). A reply to Kranzler and Weng's shooting in the dark. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Interpretive handbook. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., & Jarman, R. F. (1990). Planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) cognitive processes: A model for assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri, J. A., Das, J. P., Stevens, J. J., & Ledbetter, M. F. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processing tasks. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J., & Wilson, M. S. (1990). Cognitive processing versus traditional intelligence: Diagnostic utility, intervention implications, and treatment validity. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 443–458.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1994). 468 factor-analyzed data sets: What they tell us and don't tell us about human intelligence. Psychological Science, 5, 63–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. S. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (3rd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery—Revised. Chicago: Riverside.
   Google Scholar