References
- Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). The status of state student assessment programs in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
- Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
- Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1998). Experimental analysis of the effects of accommodations on the scores of students with disabilities (U.S. Department of Education Grant No. H023F70020). Available from S. N. Elliott, WCER, 1025 W. Johnson St., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
- Erickson, R.N., & Thurlow, M. (1996). State special education outcomes 1995. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
- Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Performance assessment using complex tasks: Implications for children with high incidence disabilities. In R. Gallimore, C. Birheimer, D. MacMillan, D. Speece, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on high-incidence disabilities: Papers in honor of Barbara K. Keogh (pp. 199–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Thompson, A., Roberts, H., Kubec, P., & Stecker, P. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Diagnostique, 19(4), 23–49.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1994). Formative evaluation of student progress: How much growth should we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C. L., Dutka, S., & Katzaroff, M. (2000). The importance of providing background information on the structure and scoring of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 1–34.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C. L., & Katzaroff, M. (in press). Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal.
- Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Monitoring Basic Skills Progress [computer software]. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
- Gardner, J., Rudner, Karisen, & Merwin, J. (1982). Stanford achievement test. New York: Psychological Corp. Kansas State Board of Education. (1991). Kansas Quality Performance Accreditation. Topeka: Author.
- Kavale, K. A., & Reece, J. H. (1992). The character of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 74–94.
- Koretz, D. (1996). The assessment of students with disabilities in Kentucky (CSE Technical Report No. 431). Los Angeles: CRESST/Rand Institute on Education and Training.
- McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. W., & Morison, P. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Morris, R. D., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Lyon, G. R., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Francis, D. J., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability and a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 347–373.
- Phillips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93–120.
- Riverside (1995). Performance assessments for the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (Technical manual). Chicago: Author.
- Thurlow, M. L. (1994). National and state perspectives on performance assessment and students with disabilities. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
- Tindal, G. (1998). Models for understanding task comparability in accommodated testing. Eugene, OR: Behavioral Research and Teaching.
- Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study. Exceptional Children, 64, 439–450.
- Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998, June). The participation of students with disabilities in large-scale testing programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Colorado Springs.
- Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., McGrew, K. S., & Shriner, J. (1994). Recommendations for making decisions about the participation of students with disabilities in statewide assessment programs (Synthesis Report No. 15). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.