Functional Behavioral Assessments: Legal Requirements and Challenges

References

• Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (1999). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Bonita Unified School District, 27 IDELR 248 (SEA CA 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., Clark, D., Gable, R., & Fox, J. (1999). A look at IDEA 1997 discipline provisions: Implications for change in the roles and responsibilities of school personnel. Preventing School Failure, 43, 64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• District of Columbia Public Schools, 28 IDELR 401 (SEA DC 1998).
   Google Scholar
• Drasgow, E., Yell, M. L., Bradley, R., & Shriner, J.G. (1999). The IDEA Amendments of 1997: A school-wide model for conducting functional behavioral assessments and developing behavior intervention plans. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 244–266.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (1999). Welcoming introduction. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Eyer, T. (1998). Greater expectations: How the 1997 IDEA Amendments raise the basic floor of opportunity for children with disabilities. Education Law Reporter, 126, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children, 57, 102–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorn, D. (1999). What do I do when…The answer book on discipline. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Groeschel, R. W. (1998). Discipline and the disabled student: The IDEA reauthorization responds. Wisconsin Law Review, 1085–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Heflin, L. J., & Simpson, R. L. (1998). Interventions for children and youth with autism: Prudent choices in a world of exaggerated claims and empty promises. Part 11: Legal/policy analysis and recommendations for selecting interventions and treatments. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R., & Carr, E. (1997). Behavioral support for students with severe disabilities: Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. Journal of Special Education, 31, 84–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Independent School District #2310, 29 IDELR 330 (SEA MN 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1401–1485.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 et. seq.
   Google Scholar
• Letter to Anonymous, 30 IDELR 707 (OSEP 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. L. (1999, May). Current legal issues in discipline of disabled students under IDEA: A section by section comment of § 1415(k), discipline regulations, and initial case law. Paper presented at LRP's Annual Conference on Special Education Law, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Moorpark Unified School District, 33 IDELR 24 (SEA CA 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. R., Roberts, N., Mathur, S., & Rutherford, R. (1999. Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature, Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• OSEP Memorandum, 26 IDELR 923 (OSEP 1997).
   Google Scholar
• OSEP Questions and Answers. (1999, March 12). Federal Register, 64, 12617–12632. Volume 64, No. 48.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, M. M. (2000). Functional behavioral assessment: The letter and the spirit of the law. Preventing School Failure, 44, 147–151.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., & Nelson, C. M. (1999). Functional behavioral assessment: Implications for training and staff development. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 249–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senate Report of the Individuals with Disabilities Act Amendments of 1997. (1997). [Online]. Available: wais.access.gpo.gov
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. R. (2000). Behavioral and discipline provisions of IDEA '97: Implicit competencies yet to be confirmed. Exceptional Children, 66, 403–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Pasadena Unified High School, 28 IDELR 1113 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (1999). Functional assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 253–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Bailey, D.B., & Sugai, G. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases. Journal of Special Education, 33, 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., & Katsiyannis, A. (2000). Functional behavioral assessment and IDEA '97: Legal and practice considerations. Preventing School Failure, 44, 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., Bradley, R., & Rozalski, M. (2000). Ensuring compliance with the disciplinary provisions of IDEA '97: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 13, 3–18.
   Google Scholar