Characteristics of Word Callers: An Investigation of the Accuracy of Teachers' Judgments of Reading Comprehension and Oral Reading Skills

References

• Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 561–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. L., & Sherbenou, R. J. (1981). A comparison of teacher perceptions of student reading ability, reading performance, and classroom behavior. The Reading Teacher, 34, 557–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of meta-cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 141–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaves, R. C., Williams, P., Wincheter, K., & Darch, C. (1994). Using teacher judgment and IQ to estimate reading and mathematics achievement in a remedial-reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 31 (3), 261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C., Deno, S. L., Maruyama, G., & Cohen, C. (1989, March). The Basic Academic Skills Samples (BASS): An instrument for the screening and identification of children at risk for failure in regular education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513–516, 575–578.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1985). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61–88). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M., Reschly, D. J., & Carey, M. P. (1987). Teachers as “tests”: Classification accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children. School Psychology Review, 16, 543–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, A., & Schrader, F. W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgment accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 777–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, K. D., George, C. A., & Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teachers' ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J., Haynes, M., & Beck, K. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers' comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G. (1983). Novice and expert judgment of individual student achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18, 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. W., Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (1998). Some methods are more effective than others. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 195–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L. (1989). Assessment of learners with special needs. Boston: Allyn & Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What to do and why to do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 18–78). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1986). The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement (Research Rep.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). The maze as a classroom-based reading measure: Construction methods, reliability, and validity. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petetit, L. (2000). Construct validity of curriculum-based measurement of reading: Contributions of method variance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, Eugene.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, C. R. (2001). An investigation of English language and reading skills on reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking English language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, Eugene.
   Google Scholar
• Salvesen, K. A., & Undheim, J. O. (1994). Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 60–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers' ratings vs. standardized tests: An empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Romance and reality. In K. E. Stanovich (Ed.), Progress in understanding reading (pp. 392–404). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. M. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D., & Wiese, M. J. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 10–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar