25
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparison of Grade-Level Controlled and Literature-Based Maze CBM Reading Passages

Pages 387-394 | Published online: 22 Dec 2019

References

  • AIMSWeb. (2002). Retrieved August 15, 2002 from: http://www.aimsweb.com/
  • Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
  • Bradley-Klug, K. L., Shapiro, E. S., Lutz, J. G., & DuPaul, G. J. (1998). Evaluation of oral reading rate as a curriculum-based measure with literature-based curriculum. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 183–197.
  • Brown-Chidsey, R., Davis, L., & Maya, C. (2003). Sources of variance in curriculum-based measures of silent reading. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 363–377.
  • Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Manual for the new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline, MA.
  • Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 37, 229–237.
  • Deno, S., Anderson, A. R., Callender, S., Lembke, E., Zorka, H., & Casey, A. (2002, March). Developing a school-wide progress monitoring system. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.
  • Espin, C. A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of general outcome measures of second students' performance on content area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497–515.
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–59.
  • Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., & Daly, E. J., III. (1998). An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty on outcomes of oral reading fluency program monitoring. School Psychology Review, 27, 433–445.
  • Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (1997). Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula? Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351–375.
  • Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., Conte, K. L., & Basile, I. M. (1997). Oral reading fluency and authentic reading materials: Criterion validity of the technical features of CBM survey-level assessment. School Psychology Review, 26, 535–553.
  • Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. M. (2001). Standard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general outcomes measurement: A manual describing development and technical features. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
  • Jenkins, J.R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421–432.
  • Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of Maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. Journal of Special Education, 34, 164–173.
  • Shinn, M.R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Shinn, M. R., Bamonto, S., Cornachione, C., Parker, C., Peterson, K., Thurber, R., & Whalen, A. (1997). Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving assessment: Training modules (5th ed.). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
  • Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., III, Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory factor analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.