280
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Topic: Validity

Universal Screening May Not Be for Everyone: Using a Threshold Model as a Smarter Way to Determine Risk

| (Action Editor)
Pages 402-414 | Received 16 Sep 2013, Accepted 09 Oct 2013, Published online: 27 Dec 2019

References

  • BatscheG.ElliottJ.GradenJ. L.GrimesJ.KovaleskiJ. F.PrasseD.TillyW. D.III. (2005). Response to intervention. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
  • BushellD.BaerD. M. (1994). Measurably superior instruction means close, continual contact with the relevant outcome data. Revolutionary! In GardnerR.SainatoD. M.CooperJ. O.HeronT. E. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 3–10). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • CattsH. W.FeyM. E.ZhangX.TomblinJ. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 32, 38–50.
  • DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exception Children.
  • EbellM. H. (2013). Evidence-based practice: Online course. Chapter 4, Diagnosis. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from http://ebp.uga.edu/courses.
  • FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.
  • FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
  • GoodR.KaminskiR. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326–336.
  • GreenwoodC. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–535.
  • HoffmanJ. R.WilkesM. S.DayF. C.BellD. S.HigaJ. K. (2006). The roulette wheel: An aid to informed decision making. PLOS Medicine, 3(6), e137. doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030137.
  • JenkinsJ. R.HudsonR. F.JohnsonE. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600.
  • JohnsonE. S.JenkinsJ. R.PetscherY. (2010). Improving the accuracy of a direct route screening process. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 131–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508409348375.
  • KovaleskiJ. F.VanDerHeydenA. M.ShapiroE. S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • LevineM. N.GafniA.MarkhamB. (1992). A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine, 117, 53–58.
  • MarstonD.MirkinP.DenoS. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 109–117.
  • MeehlP. E.RosenA. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048070
  • MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.
  • PaukerS. G.KassiererJ. P. (1980). The threshold approach to clinical decision making. New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 1109–1117.
  • President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
  • SackettD. L.RosenbergW. M. C.GrayJ. A. M.HaynesR. B.RichardsonW. S. (1996). Editorial: Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
  • SchulteA. C.MurrN. S.OsbeckK.MuldohkarP. ( in press). Measurement in consultation research. In ErchulW. P.SheridanS. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Routledge.
  • ShinnM. R. (1987). Identifying and defining academic problems: CBM screening and eligibility procedures. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.) Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 90–129). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • ShinnM. R.TindalG. A.SpiraD. A. (1987). Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests? Exceptional Children, 54, 32–40.
  • SpeeceD. L.CaseL. P.MolloyD. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 147–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540–5826.00071.
  • StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
  • VanDerHeydenA. M. (2010). Determining early mathematical risk: Ideas for extending the research [Invited Commentary]. School Psychology Review, 39, 196–202.
  • VanDerHeydenA. M. (2011). Technical adequacy of RtI decisions. Exceptional Children, 77, 335–350.
  • VanDerHeydenA. M.CoddingR.MartinR. (2013). Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • VanDerHeydenA. M.WittJ. C. (2005). Quantifying the context of assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review, 34, 161–183.
  • WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203.
  • YsseldykeJ. E.SalviaJ. (1974). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: Two models. Exceptional Children, 41, 181–185.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.