Tier 2 Intervention for At-Risk First-Grade Students Within a Response-to-Intervention Model of Support

References

• BakerS.GerstenR.LeeD.-S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002308
   Google Scholar
• BryantD. P.BryantB. R.GerstenR.ScammaccaN.ChavezM. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first and second grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantD. P.BryantB. R.GerstenR.ScammaccaN.FunkC.WinterA.PoolC. (2008). The effects of Tier 2 intervention on first-grade mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 47–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20528817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.PfannenstielK. H.PorterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantD. P.BryantB. R.ShinM-Y.PfannenstielK. H. ( in press). Learning disabilities: Mathematics characteristics and instructional exemplars. In ChinnS. (Ed.), International handbook on mathematics learning disabilities and dyscalculia. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• BryantD. P.BryantB. R.WilliamsJ.KimS. A. (2010). Strategies for improving student outcomes in mathematics computation. In ChardD.TankersleyM.CookB. (Eds.), Effective practices in special education. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• BryantD. P.PfannenstielK. H.BryantB. R. (2014). Early numeracy intervention program. Austin, TX: Psycho-Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• ButlerF. M.MillerS. P.CrehanK.BabbitB.PierceT. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkeet al.. (2014). School Psychology Review.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards. (2010). Common core standards for mathematics. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CoyneM. D.Kame'enuiE. J.CarnineD. W. (2011). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• FryeD.BaroodyA. J.BurchinalM.CarverS. M.JordanN. C.McDowellJ. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide (NCEE 2014–4005). Retrieved from National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance website: http://whatworks.ed.gov
   Google Scholar
• FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FusonK. C.GrandauL.SugiyamaP. A. (2001). Achievable numerical understandings for all young children. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7, 522–526.
   Google Scholar
• GearyD. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370010201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GearyD. C.HamsonC. O.HoardM. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL.NumteeC. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GinsburgH. P.KleinA.StarkeyP. (1998). The development of children's mathematical knowledge: Connecting research with practice. In DamonW.RenningerK. A.SigelI. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (5th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 401–476). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• GriffinS. (2004). Building number sense with number worlds: A mathematics program for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GriffinS.CaseR. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education, 3, 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• JordanN. C.KaplanD.HanichL. B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JordanN. C.KaplanD.LocuniakM. N.RamineniC. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• JordanN. C.KaplanD. K.Ol'ahL. N.LocuniakM. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77(1), 153–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JordanN. C.LevineS. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2013). The nation's report card. A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014–451). Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Essential understanding of number & operation: Pre-K-2. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/index.html
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009) Mathematics learning in early childhood: Pathways toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• SwansonH. L. (2006). Cross-sectional and incremental changes in working memory and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 265–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–0663.98.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwansonH. L.HoskynM.LeeC. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities. A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of Texas System & Texas Education Agency. (2007). Texas Early Mathematics Inventories-Outcome. Austin, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2013). What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook version 3.0. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar