Relative Value of Common Screening Measures in Mathematics

References

• Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, C. R., & Christ, T. J. (2012). Supporting valid decision making: Uses and misuses of assessment data within the context of RtI. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 231–244. doi:10.1002/pits.21592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandeira de Mello, V. (2011), Mapping state proficiency standards onto NAEP scales: Variation and change in state standards for reading and mathematics 2005-2009 (NCES 2011-458). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Peters, R., & Noell, G. H. (2008). Using performance feedback to enhance implementation fidelity of the problem-solving team process. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 537–550. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., Scullin, S., Tolbize, A., & Jiban, C. L. (2008). Implications of recent research: Curriculum-based measurement of math computation. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 198–205. doi:10.1177/1534508407313480
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., & Lindsay, J. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66, 227–268. doi:10.2307/1170523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hollenbeck, K. N., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2011). Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 372–380. doi:10.1177/0022219411407867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention. Exceptional Children, 73, 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, B. (1999). Relationships between student performance on the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System and other tests – Collaborating district A, grades 4 and 10. Dover, NH: The National Center for Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.nciea.org/publication_PDFs/StudPerf_Mass_Gong99.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graney, S. B., Missall, K. N., Martínez, R. S., & Bergstrom, M. (2009). A preliminary investigation of within-year growth patterns in reading and mathematics curriculum-based measures. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 121–142. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M., Christ, T. J., & Methe, S. A. (2006). Curriculum-based assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M., Ryan, A. L., & Stoner, G. (2003). Concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills and the comprehensive test of phonological processing. School Psychology Review, 32, 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, J., Hosp, M. A., & Dole, J. K. (2011). Potential bias in predictive validity of universal screening measures across disaggregation subgroups. School Psychology Review, 40, 108–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosp, J. L., & Ardoin, S. P. (2008). Assessment for instructional planning. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 69–77. doi:10.1177/1534508407311428
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Petscher, Y. (2010). Improving the accuracy of a direct route screening process. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 131–140. doi:10.1177/1534508409348375
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Mercer, S. H., & Shapiro, E. S. (2014). Differences in growth on math curriculum-based measures using triennial benchmarks. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39, 146–155. doi:10.1177/1534508412452750
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Shapiro, E. S., & Hintze, J. (2008). Long-term diagnostic accuracy of curriculum-based measures in reading and mathematics. School Psychology Review, 37, 374–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868
   Google Scholar
• Kovaleski, J., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Shapiro, E. (2013). The RtI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2013). Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment (MEPA) 2011-12 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.mcasservicecenter.com/documents/MA/Technical%20Report/2012/MEPA%202011-12%20Technical%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012-458). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points. Retrieved from http://www.nctmmedia.org/cfp/focal_points_by_grade.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2010). Mathematics computation: Administration and technical manual. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Pepe, M. S. (2003). The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E., & Lastra-Anadon, C. X. (2010). State standards rise in reading, fall in math. Education Next, 10(4), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2012). Curricular coherence and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. (2011). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., & Clemens, N. H. (2009). A conceptual model for evaluating system effects of response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 3–16. doi:10.1177/1534508408330080
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Keller, M. A., Lutz, G., Santoro, L., & Hintze, J. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized test: Reading and mathematics performance in Pennsylvania. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 19–35. doi:10.1177/0734282905285237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., & Zhou, X. (2012). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Soderstrom, I. (1999). Predicting elementary and secondary school achievement with school-related and demographic factors. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 330–338. doi:10.1080/00220679909597616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A., & Burns, M. (2009). Performance indicators in math: Implications for brief experimental analysis of academic performance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 71–91. doi:10.1007/s10864-009-9081-x
   Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2010). Determining early mathematical risk: Ideas for extending the research [Invited commentary]. School Psychology Review, 39, 196–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2013). Universal screening may not be for everyone: Using a threshold model as a smarter way to determine risk. School Psychology Review, 42, 402–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Burns, M. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 15–31. doi:10.1177/073724770503000302
   Google Scholar
• Wells, C. S., Baldwin, S., Hambleton, R. K., Sireci, S. G., Karatonis, A., & Jirka, S. (2009). Evaluating score equity assessment for state NAEP. Applied Measurement in Education, 22(4), 394–408. doi:10.1080/08957340903221683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar