Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Volume 35, 2017 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,993
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Patient participation in decision-making about cardiovascular preventive drugs – resistance as agency

Josabeth HultbergPrimary Care and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Carl Edvard RudebeckResearch Unit, Kalmar County Council, Sweden, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, NorwayView further author information
Pages 231-239 | Received 20 Sep 2016, Accepted 24 Jan 2017, Published online: 28 Feb 2017

References

  • Förebyggande av aterosklerotisk hjärt-kärlsjukdom (Prevention ofatherosclerotic cardiovascular disease). Läkemedelsverket Informerar 2006;17:16–97.
  • Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Atherosclerosis. 2016;252:207–274.
  • Gigerenzer G. Collective statistical illiteracy: a cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples: comment on “Statistical numeracy for health”. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:468.
  • Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N. for the Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ. 2014;348:g3725.
  • Dalby Landmark AM, Gulbrandsen P, Svennevig J. Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions. J Pragmat. 2015;78:54–69.
  • Hultberg J, Rudebeck CE. Clinical gaze in risk-factor haze: Swedish GPs’ perceptions of prescribing cardiovascular preventive drugs. Int J Family Med. 2012;2012:612572.
  • Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–312.
  • Stivers T. Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: one resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision. Health Commun. 2005;18:41–74.
  • Koenig CJ. Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1105–1114.
  • Costello BA, Roberts F. Medical recommendations as joint social practice. Health Commun. 2001;13:241–260.
  • Roberts C, Sarangi S. Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ. 2005;39:632–640.
  • O’Hair D, Villagran MM, Wittenberg E, et al. Cancer survivorship and agency model: implications for patient choice, decision-making, and influence. Health Commun. 2003;15:193–202.
  • Atkinson JM, Heritage J. Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
  • Ijäs-Kallio T, Ruusuvuori J, Peräkylä A. Patient resistance towards diagnosis in primary care: implications for concordance. Health (London). 2010;14:505–522.
  • Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday; 1959.
  • Aronsson K, Sätterlund-Larsson U. Politeness strategies and doctor-patient communication. On the social choreography of collaborative thinking. J Lang Soc Psychol. 1987;6:1–27.
  • Ainsworth-Vaughn N. Claiming power in doctor-patient talk. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  • Bergen C, Stivers T. Patient disclosure of medical misdeeds. J Health Soc Behav. 2013;54:221–240.
  • Dalby Landmark AM, Svennevig J, Gulbrandsen P. Negotiating treatment preferences: physicians’ formulations of patients’ stance. Soc Sci Med. 2016;149:26–36.
  • Berbyuk Lindström N. Intercultural communication in health care: non-Swedish physicians in Sweden [master’s thesis]. Göteborg: University of Gothenburgh; 2008. p. 148–158.
  • Lindström A, Weatherall A. Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions. J Pragmat. 2015;78:39–53.
  • Andén A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE. Satisfaction is not all – patients’ perceptions of outcome of general practice consultations, a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:43.
  • Robertson M, Moir J, Skelton J, et al. When the business of sharing treatment decisions is not the same as shared decision making: a discourse analysis of decision sharing in general practice. Health (London). 2011;15:78–95.
  • Vick S, Scott A. Agency in health care. Examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. J Health Econ. 1998;17:587–605.
  • Pilnick A, Dingwall R. On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:1374–1382.
  • Guassora AD, Nielsen SB, Reventlow S. Deciding if lifestyle is a problem: GP risk assessments or patient evaluations? A conversation analytic study of preventive consultations in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;3:191–198.
  • Ofstad EH, Frich JC, Schei E, et al. Temporal characteristics of decisions in hospital encounters: a threshold for shared decision making? A qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97:216–222.
  • Sarangi S, Roberts C. Talk, work and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1999.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.