‘Illuminating determinants of implementation of non-dispensing pharmacist services in home care: a qualitative interview study’

References

• World Health Organization. WHO launches global effort to halve medication-related errors in 5 years. Geneva, World Health Organization 2017, www.who.int. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/29-03-2017-who-launches-global-effort-to-halve-medication-related-errors-in-5-years
   Google Scholar
• Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):827 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen MR. American pharmacists A. Medication errors. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C, American Pharmacists Association; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after to err is humanwhat have we learned? JAMA. 2005;293(19):2384–2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Barra M, Scott CL, Scott NW, et al. Pharmacist services for non-hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):Cd013102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkansah N, Mostovetsky O, Yu C, et al. Effect of outpatient pharmacists’ non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns [Review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;7.
   Google Scholar
• Moore G, Campbell M, Copeland L, et al. Adapting interventions to new contexts-THE ADAPT guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n1679 10.1136/bmj.n1679. PMC: 34344699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, 2003. 5th Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RE, Crosson JC, O'Malley AS, et al. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) TO produce actionable findings: A rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):15 10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7. PMC: 28187747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):327–350. 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0. 18322790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Grol R, Grimshaw J. Improving patient care: The implementation of change in health care. Newark: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2020
   Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061 10.1136/bmj.n2061. PMC: 34593508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3-4):462–480. 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x. 22644083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Massetti C, Meier CR, Guglielmo BJ. The scope of drug-related problems in the home care setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40(2):325–334. 10.1007/s11096-017-0581-9. 29322475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. 2. utg. ed. InterView[s] learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Gyldendal akademisk, Oslo; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. PMC: 25895742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. PMC: 19664226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton K, Bhattacharya D, Scott S, et al. Barriers and facilitators to pharmacists integrating into the ward-based multidisciplinary team: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Res Social Adm Pharm, Vol. 17, p.1923-1936. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Claire M, Claire A, Matthew B. The role of clinical pharmacists in general practice in England: impact, perspectives, barriers and facilitators. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022;18(8):3432–3437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond P, Munir K, Alabi O, et al. Barriers and facilitators of medicines reconciliation at transitions of care in Ireland - a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. 20957426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-A, Jeffs L, Barwick M, et al. Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: a systematic integrative review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):72–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel AI. Burnout and work engagement: the JD–R approach. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):389–411.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn VM, Saint S, Krein SL, et al. Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(1):74–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnemaki J, Airaksinen M, Valaste M, et al. Impact of the automated dose dispensing with medication review on geriatric primary care patients drug use in Finland: a nationwide cohort study with matched controls. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35(4):379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnell K, Fastbom J. Multi-dose drug dispensing and inappropriate drug use: a nationwide register-based study of over 700000 elderly. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(2):86–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks H, Brown Trinidad S. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1372–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulston K. Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qual Res. 2010;10(2):199–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar