Stakeholder views on work participation for workers with depression and intersectoral collaboration in depression care: a focus group study with a salutogenic perspective

References

• GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burcusa SL, Iacono WG. Risk for recurrence in depression. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27(8):959–985. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman T, Kjellberg A, Danermark B, et al. Employment opportunities for persons with different types of disability. Alter. 2015;9(2):116–129. doi: 10.1016/j.alter.2014.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri S. Unemployment associated with major depression disorder and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28(4):2080–2092. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1954793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri S, Behnezhad S. Depression symptoms and risk of sick leave: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(7):1495–1512. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01703-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Mental health at work. WHO; 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-at-work
   Google Scholar
• Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, et al. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):543–556. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8033-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health]. Depresjon – Nasjonale retningslinjer for diagnostisering og behandling av voksne med depresjon i primær- og spesialisthelsetjenesten. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2009 [updated 2022 Jun 17; cited 2022 Dec 11]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/produkter?tema=retningslinje
   Google Scholar
• Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–542. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8032-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr N, Vania D, Randall G, et al. Impact of information and communication technology on interprofessional collaboration for chronic disease management: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017;22(4):250–257. doi: 10.1177/1355819617714292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen RM, Pii KH, Bültmann U, et al. Developing normative integration among professionals in an intersectoral collaboration: a multi-method investigation of an integrated intervention for people on sick leave due to common mental disorders. Int J Integr Care. 2019;19(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thisted CN, Labriola M, Vinther Nielsen C, et al. Managing employees’ depression from the employees’, co-workers’ and employers’ perspectives. An integrative review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(4):445–459. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1499823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ML, Pbert L, Lemon SC. Influence of family, friend and coworker social support and social undermining on weight gain prevention among adults. Obesity. 2014;22(9):1973–1980. doi: 10.1002/oby.20814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health]. Styringsdata for fastlegeordningen, 4. kvartal 2020 [Regular General Practitioner Scheme statistics, 4th quarter 2020]: Helsedirektoratet; 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/statistikk/fastlegestatistikk#fastlegestatistikk
   Google Scholar
• Arbeidstilsynet [The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority]. Oppfølging av sykemeldte. Arbeidstilsynet; 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/arbeidsforhold/tilrettelegging/oppfolging-av-sykmeldte/
   Google Scholar
• NAV [The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration]. Hvem gjør hva i sykefraværsarbeidet? NAV [The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration]; 2014 [updated 2022 Dec 7; cited 2022 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.nav.no/no/bedrift/oppfolging/sykmeldt-arbeidstaker/relatert-informasjon/slik-folger-du-opp-sykmeldte/hvem-gjor-hva-i-sykefravaersarbeidet_kap
   Google Scholar
• Reme SE. Common mental disorders and work. In: Bültmann U, Siegrist J, editors. Handbook of disability, work and health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1996;11(1):11–18. doi: 10.1093/heapro/11.1.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Health promoting factors at work: the sense of coherence. In: Kalimo R, El Batawi MA, Cooper CL, editors. Psychosocial factors at work and their relation to health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1987. p. 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Idan O, Eriksson M, Al-Yagon M. The salutogenic model: the role of generalized resistance resources. In: Mittelmark M, Sagy S, Eriksson M, et al., editors. The handbook of salutogenesis. Cham: Springer; 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6_7.
   Google Scholar
• Piiroinen I, Tuomainen T-P, Tolmunen T, et al. Sense of coherence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2020;82(6):561–567. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer GF, Jenny GJ. Development, implementation and dissemination of occupational health management (OHM): putting salutogenesis into practice. In: McIntyre, Scott Houdmondt, Jonathan (editors), Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice. Castelo de Maia: ISMAI Publications; 2007. p. 219–250.
   Google Scholar
• Broetje S, Bauer GF, Jenny GJ. The relationship between resourceful working conditions, work-related and general sense of coherence. Health Promot Int. 2020;35(5):1168–1179. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt K, Jenny GJ, Bauer GF. Comprehensibility, manageability and meaningfulness at work: construct validity of a scale measuring work-related sense of coherence. SA J Ind Psychol. 2013;39(1):1–8. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v39i1.1111.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf J, Angerer P, Müting G, et al. Return to work after common mental disorders: a qualitative study exploring the expectations of the involved stakeholders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sighinolfi C, Nespeca C, Menchetti M, et al. Collaborative care for depression in European countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2014;77(4):247–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbière M, Mazaniello-Chézol M, Lecomte T, et al. Developing a collaborative and sustainable return to work program for employees with common mental disorders: a participatory research with public and private organizations. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(18):5199–5211. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1931481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Fokusgrupper som forskningsmetode for medisin og helsefag. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Acocella I, Cataldi S. Using focus groups: theory, methodology, practice. London: SAGE Publications; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9690-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Super S, Wagemakers MAE, Picavet HSJ, et al. Strengthening sense of coherence: opportunities for theory building in health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2015;31(4):869–878. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrini A, Corbière M, Lecomte T, et al. How can supervisors contribute to the return to work of employees who have experienced depression? J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):279–288. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9715-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Eib C. Sustainable return to work: a systematic review focusing on personal and social factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):679–700. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09832-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers EPM, Mathijssen J, Van Bortel T, et al. Discrimination in the workplace, reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional study in 35 countries. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e009961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenny GJ, Bauer GF, Vinje HF, et al. Applying salutogenesis in the workplace. In: Mittelmark M, Sagy S, Eriksson M, et al., editors. The handbook of salutogenesis. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 321–336. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-79515-3_31
   Google Scholar
• Bertilsson M, Petersson E-L, Östlund G, et al. Capacity to work while depressed and anxious – a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(20):1705–1711. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.751135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma V, Guassora AD. Information power: Sample content and size in qualitative studies. In: Camic PM, editor. Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2021. p. 67–81. doi: 10.1037/0000252-004
   Google Scholar