How do patients experience and use home blood pressure monitoring? A qualitative analysis with UTAUT 2

References

• World Health Organization (WHO). Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2023 May 10]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44203/9789241563871_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• St Sauver JL, Boyd CM, Grossardt BR, et al. Risk of developing multimorbidity across all ages in an historical cohort study: differences by sex and ethnicity. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCance T, McCormack B, Dewing J. An exploration of person-centredness in practice. Online J Issues Nurs. 2011;16(2):1. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man01.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guanais FC. Patient empowerment can lead to improvements in health-care quality. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(7):489–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardsen AL, Hardeland C, Helgesen AK, et al. Patient experiences with technology enabled care across healthcare settings ‒ a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05633-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafazzo JA, Leonard K, Easty AC, et al., editors. Bridging the Self-care Deficit Gap: remote Patient Monitoring and the Hospital-at-Home. Electronic Healthcare. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chase HP, Pearson JA, Wightman C, et al. Modem transmission of glucose values reduces the costs and need for clinic visits. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1475–1479. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, et al. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(1):15–21. doi: 10.1370/afm.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breaux-Shropshire TL, Judd E, Vucovich LA, et al. Does home blood pressure monitoring improve patient outcomes? A systematic review comparing home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control and patient outcomes. Integr Blood Press Control. 2015;8:43–49. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S49205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stergiou GS, Bliziotis IA. Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension: a systematic review. AmJ Hypertension. 2011;24(2):123–134. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26(8):1505–1526. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328308da66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K, et al. Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform. 2019;124:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs SC, Ferreira-da-Silva AL, Moreira LB, et al. Efficacy of isolated home blood pressure monitoring for blood pressure control: randomized controlled trial with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring – MONITOR study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(1):75–80. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834e5a4f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pioli MR, Ritter AM, de Faria AP, et al. White coat syndrome and its variations: differences and clinical impact. Integr Blood Press Control. 2018;11:73–79. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S152761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Service England (NHS). Home blood pressure monitoring: nhs.uk; 2023. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/clinical-policy/cvd/home-blood-pressure-monitoring/
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell E, Cox T, O'Connell P, et al. Implementation of simple telehealth to manage hypertension in general practice: a service evaluation. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0301-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Natale P, Ni JY, Martinez-Martin D, et al. Perspectives and experiences of self-monitoring of blood pressure among patients with hypertension: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Am J Hypertens. 2023;36(7):372–384. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera PM, Dalton AR. Do-it-yourself healthcare: the current landscape, prospects and consequences. Maturitas. 2014;77(1):37–40. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roebroek LO, Bruins J, Delespaul P, et al. Qualitative analysis of clinicians’ perspectives on the use of a computerized decision aid in the treatment of psychotic disorders. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01251-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler SKMM. How do potential users perceive the adoption of new technologies within the field of Artificial Intelligence and Internet-of-Things ‒ a revision of the UTAUT 2 model using Voice Assistants. Lund; 2017 [cited 2023 May 10]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8909840&fileOId=8909844
   Google Scholar
• Tamilmani K, Rana NP, Wamba SF, et al. The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): a systematic literature review and theory evaluation. Int J Inf Manage. 2021;57:102269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh VT, James YL, Xu X. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2016;17(5):328–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, et al. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):215824401452263. doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering TG, Miller NH, Ogedegbe G, et al. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Hypertension. 2008;52(1):1–9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant S, Greenfield SM, Nouwen A, et al. Improving management and effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative UK primary care study. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(640):e776-83–e783. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MI, Greenfield SM, Bray EP, et al. Patients’ experiences of self-monitoring blood pressure and self-titration of medication: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(595):e135-42–e142. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X625201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis KL, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, et al. Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(1):46–56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DFBC. Nursing Research. 11th ed. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah A, Liew SM, Hanafi NS, et al. What influences patients’ acceptance of a blood pressure telemonitoring service in primary care? A qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:99–106. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S94687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar