Characterizing forest species composition using multiple remote sensing data sources and inventory approaches

References

• Anderson JE, Plourde LC, Martin ME, Braswell BH, Smith ML, Dubayah RO, Hofton MA, Blair JBJ. 2008. Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest. Remote Sens Environ. 112:1856–1870.10.1016/j.rse.2007.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asner GP, Knapp DE, Boardman J, Green RO, Kennedy-Bowdoin T, Eastwood M, Martin RE, Anderson C, Field CB. 2012. Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion. Remote Sens Environ. 124:454–465.10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P. 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manage. 254:1–15.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtberg T. 2002. Individual tree-based species classification in high spatial resolution aerial images of forests using fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 132:371–387.10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtberg T. 2007. Classifying individual tree species under leaf-off and leaf-on conditions using airborne LIDAR. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 61:325–340.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidenbach J, Næsset E, Lien V, Gobakken T, Solberg S. 2010. Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ. 114:911–924.10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45:5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buongiorno J, Gilless JK. 2003. Decision methods for forest resource management. San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press; p. 439.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Liaw A, Breiman L. 2004. Using random forest to learn imbalanced data. Technical report, Department of Statistics, University of California Berkeley; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Clark ML, Roberts DA, Clark DB. 2005. Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales. Remote Sens Environ. 96:375–398.10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 20:37–46.10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook B, Corp L, Nelson R, Morton D, Ranson KJ, Masek J, Middleton E. 2012. G-LiHT: Goddard's LiDAR, hyperspectral and thermal airborne imager In: Proceedings of SilviLaser: First Return Vancouver, BC, Canada; p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Crookston NL, Finley AO. 2008. yaImpute: an R package for kNN imputation. J Stat Softw. 23:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 88:2783–2792.10.1890/07-0539.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalponte M, Bruzzone L., Gianelle D. 2008. Fusion of hyperspectral and LIDAR remote sensing data for classification of complex forest areas. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 46:1416–1427.10.1109/TGRS.2008.916480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalponte M, Bruzzone L, Gianelle D. 2012. Tree species classification in the Southern Alps based on the fusion of very high geometrical resolution multispectral/hyperspectral images and LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ. 123:258–270.10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue DNM, Watt PJ, Cox NJ, Wilson J. 2007. Remote sensing of species mixtures in conifer plantations using LiDAR height and intensity data. Remote Sens Environ. 110:509–522.10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid T, Næsset E. 1998. Determination of stand volume in practical forest inventories based on field measurements and photo-interpretation: the Norwegian experience. Scand J Forest Res. 13:246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid T, Gobakken T, Næsset E. 2004. Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses. Scand J Forest Res. 19:512–523.10.1080/02827580410019463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ene L, Næsset E., Gobakken T. 2012. Single tree detection in heterogeneous boreal forests using airborne laser scanning and area-based stem number estimates. Int J Remote Sen. 33:5171–5193.10.1080/01431161.2012.657363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitje A, Vestjordet E. 1977. Stand height curves and new tariff tables for Norway spruce (In Norwegian with English abstract). Meddelelser fra Norsk institutt for skogforskning. Ås: Norwegian Forest Research Institute; p. 23–68.
   Google Scholar
• Flewelling J. 2008. Probability models for individually segmented tree crown images in a sampling context. In: Hill R, Rosette J, Suárez J, editors. Proceedings of Silvilaser 2008, 8th International Conference on LiDAR Applications in Forest Assessment and Inventory; Edinburgh, UK ( ): Heriot-Watt University; p. 284–293.
   Google Scholar
• Flewelling J. 2009. Forest inventory predictions from individual tree crowns: regression modeling within a sample framework In: McRoberts RE, Reams GA, Van Deusen PC, McWilliams WH, editors. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium 2006. Monterey, California: United States Department of Agriculture; p. 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gobakken T, Næsset E. 2008. Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data. Can J Forest Res. 38:1095–1109.10.1139/X07-219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal S, Woodcock C. 1994. Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 60:181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill RA, Thomson AG. 2005. Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LiDAR data. Int J Remote Sens. 26:3763–3779.10.1080/01431160500114706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren J, Persson Å. 2004. Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner. Remote Sens Environ. 90:415–423.10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00140-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren J, Persson Å, Söderman U. 2008. Species identification of individual trees by combining high resolution LIDAR data with multi-spectral images. Int J Remote Sens. 29:1537–1552.10.1080/01431160701736471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde P, Dubayah R, Walker W, Blair JB, Hofton M, Hunsaker C. 2006. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sens Environ. 102:63–73.10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyyppä H, Hyyppä J. 1999. Comparing the accuracy of laser scanner with other optical remote sensing data sources for stand attributes retrieval. Photogramm J Finland. 16:5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hyyppä HJ, Hyyppä JM. 2001. Effects of stand size on the accuracy of remote sensing-based forest inventory. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 39:2613–2621.10.1109/36.974996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyyppä J, Inkinen M. 1999. Detecting and estimating attributes for single trees using laser scanner. Photogramm J Finland. 16:27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hyyppä J, Kelle O, Lehikoinen M., Inkinen M. 2001. A segmentation-based method to retrieve stem volume estimates from 3-D tree height models produced by laser scanners. IEEE Trans on Geosci Remote Sens. 39:969–975.10.1109/36.921414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson G, Angelstam P. 1999. Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) in a boreal landscape. Landscape Ecol. 14:283–290.10.1023/A:1008085902053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke YH, Quackenbush LJ, Im J. 2010. Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sens Environ. 114:1141–1154.10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpela I, Ørka HO, Maltamo M, Tokola T, Hyyppä J. 2010. Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR–effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type. Silva Fenn. 44:319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg E, Holmgren J, Olofsson K, Wallerman J, Olsson H. 2010. Estimation of tree lists from airborne laser scanning by combining single-tree and area-based methods. Int J Remote Sens. 31:1175–1192.10.1080/01431160903380649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson M, Fransson JES, Olsson H. 2007. Aerial photo-interpretation using Z/I DMC images for estimation of forest variables. Scand J Forest Res. 22:254–266.10.1080/02827580701262964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Eerikäinen K, Pitkänen J, Hyyppä J, Vehmas M. 2004. Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions. Remote Sens Environ. 90:319–330.10.1016/j.rse.2004.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Packalen P, Kallio E, Kangas J, Uuttera J, Heikkilä J. 2011. Airborne laser scanning based stand level management inventory in Finland. In: Proceedings of SilviLaser 2011, 11th International Conference on LiDAR Applications for Assessing Forest Ecosystems; 2011 October 16–20; University of Tasmania, Australia: Conference Secretariat; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO, Næsset E. 2010. Advances and emerging issues in national forest inventories. Scand J Forest Res. 25:368–381.10.1080/02827581.2010.496739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora B, Wulder MA, White JC. 2010. Identifying leading species using tree crown metrics derived from very high spatial resolution imagery in a boreal forest environment. Can J Remote Sens. 36:332–344.10.5589/m10-052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2002. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens Environ. 80:88–99.10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset E. 2004. Accuracy of forest inventory using airborne laser scanning: evaluating the first nordic full-scale operational project. Scand J Forest Res. 19:554–557.10.1080/02827580410019544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ørka HO, Næsset E, Bollandsås OM. 2009. Classifying species of individual trees by intensity and structure features derived from airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens Environ. 113:1163–1174.10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ørka HO, Næsset E, Bollandsås OM. 2010. Effects of different sensors and leaf-on and leaf-off canopy conditions on echo distributions and individual tree properties derived from airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ. 114:1445–1461.10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ørka HO, Gobakken T, Næsset E, Ene L, Lien V. 2012. Simultaneously acquired airborne laser scanning and multispectral imagery for individual tree species identification. Can J Remote Sens. 38:125–138.10.5589/m12-021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packalén P, Maltamo M. 2006. Predicting the plot volume by tree species using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Forest Sci. 52:611–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packalén P, Maltamo M. 2008. Estimation of species-specific diameter distributions using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs. Can J Forest Res. 38:1750–1760.10.1139/X08-037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packalén P, Suvanto A, Maltamo M. 2009. A two stage method to estimate species-specific growing stock. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 75:1451–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson Å, Holmgren J, Söderman U. 2002. Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 68:925–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peuhkurinen JPJ, Mehtätalo LML, Maltamo M. 2011. Comparing individual tree detection and the area-based statistical approach for the retrieval of forest stand characteristics using airborne laser scanning in Scots pine stands. Can J Forest Res. 41:583–598.10.1139/X10-223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg S, Næsset E, Bollandsås OM. 2006. Single tree segmentation using airborne laser scanner data in a structurally heterogeneous spruce forest. Photogramm Eng. Remote Sens. 72:1369–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway [Internet]. 2012. Commercial roundwood removals [cited 2012 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.ssb.no/skogav_en/tab-2012-08-03-01-en.html
   Google Scholar
• Story M, Congalton RG. 1986. Accuracy assessment–a users perspective. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 52:397–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson ID, Maher SC, Rouillard DP, Fryxell JM, Baker JA. 2007. Accuracy of forest inventory mapping: some implications for boreal forest management. Forest Ecol Manage. 252:208–221.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treitz P, Lim K, Woods M, Pitt D, Nesbitt D, Etheridge D. 2012. LiDAR sampling density for forest resource inventories in Ontario, Canada. Remote Sens. 4:830–848.10.3390/rs4040830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vauhkonen J, Korpela I, Maltamo M, Tokola T. 2010. Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics. Remote Sens Environ. 114:1263–1276.10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vauhkonen J, Seppänen A, Packalén P, Tokola T. 2012a. Improving species-specific plot volume estimates based on airborne laser scanning and image data using alpha shape metrics and balanced field data. Remote Sens Environ. 124:534–541.10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vauhkonen J, Ene L, Gupta S, Heinzel J, Holmgren J, Pitkänen J, Solberg S, Wang Y, Weinacker H, Hauglin KM. 2012b. Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest. Forestry. 85:27–40.10.1093/forestry/cpr051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waser LT, Ginzler C, Kuechler M, Baltsavias E, Hurni L. 2011. Semi-automatic classification of tree species in different forest ecosystems by spectral and geometric variables derived from airborne digital sensor (ADS40) and RC30 data. Remote Sens Environ. 115:76–85.10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Hyyppä J, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M. 2010. Comparison of area-based and individual tree-based methods for predicting plot-level forest attributes. Remote Sens. 2:1481–1495.10.3390/rs2061481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar