Questioning the contemporary forest planning paradigm: making use of local knowledge

References

• Alutto JA, Belasco JA. 1972. A typology for participation in organizational decision making. Adm Sci Q. 17:117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananda J, Herath G. 2003. The use of analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy Econ. 5:13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson D. 2005. Approaches to integrated strategic/tactical forest planning [Licentiatavhandling]. Umeå: Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson D, Eriksson LO. 2007. Effects of temporal aggregation in integrated strategic/tactical and strategic forest planning. Forest Policy Econ. 9:965–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson SO. 1971. Modeller för långsiktiga driftsplaner i skogsbruket [Models for long term plans in forestry]. 7. Stockholm: Forskningssstiftelsen Skogsarbeten.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris C. 1998. Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. Harvard Bus Rev. 76:98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora R. 2002. Implementing KM – a balanced score card approach. J Knowl Manag. 6:240–249.
   Google Scholar
• Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, Weber TJ. 2009. Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 60:421–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskent E, Jordan G. 1991. Spatial wood supply simulation modelling. Forest Chron. 67:610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin D, Frayret J-M, LeBel L. 2010. Negotiation-based distributed wood procurement planning within a multi-firm environment. Forest Policy Econ. 12:79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger P, Lennette M, Johnson KN, Spies TA. 2005. A hierarchical spatial framework for forest landscape planning. Ecol Model. 182:25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti KK, Nawab S, Akbar A. 2011. Effect of direct participation on organizational commitment. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2:15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boston K, Bettinger P. 2001. Development of spatially feasible forest plans: a comparison of two modeling approaches. Silva Fenn. 35:425–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchy M, Hoverman S. 2000. Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. Forest Policy Econ. 1:15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Burke WW. 2011. On the legacy of theory. J Manag Hist. 17:193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM. 1961. The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Byham WC, Cox J. 1992. Zapp!: the lightning of empowerment. London: Development Dimensions International.
   Google Scholar
• Cea C, Jofré A. 2000. Linking strategic and tactical forestry planning decisions. Ann Oper Res., 95:131–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark HH. 1996. Using language. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis LS, Liu G. 1991. Integrated forest planning across multiple ownerships and decision makers. Forest Sci. 37:200–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RG, Martell DL. 1993. A decision support system that links short-term silvicultural operating plans with long-term forest-level strategic plans. Can J Forest Res. 23:1078–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvemo K, Lämås T, Eriksson LO, Wikström P. 2012. Introducing cost-plus-loss analysis into a hierarchical forestry planning environment. Ann Oper Res., 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1139-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev. 14:57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson LO. 1987. Ranking stands with treatment indices. Scand J Forest Res. 2:239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M. 2008. Strategisk och taktisk planering samt länken där emellan: analysav planerings processens genomförande vid SCA Skog [Strategic and tactical planning and the link between: analysis of implementation of the planning process at SCA Forest]. Arbetsrapport no. 207. Umeå: Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hartog DN, Muijen JJ, Koopman PL. 1997. Transactional versus transformational leadership: an analysis of the MLQ. J Occup Organ Psychol. 70:19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsson M, Karlsson J, Rönnqvist M. 2007. Optimization models for forest road upgrade planning. J Math Model Algorithms. 6:3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Heureka. 2013. Heureka Wiki. [Internet]. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; [cited 2013 Mar 6]. Available from: http://heureka.ad.slu.se/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
   Google Scholar
• Hiltunen V, Kurttila M, Pykäläinen J. 2012. Strengthening top-level guidance in geographically hierarchical large scale forest planning: experiences from the Finnish state forests. Silva Fenn. 46:539–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugosson M, McCluskey D. 2008. Strategy transformations of the Swedish sawmilling sector 1990–2005. Studia forestalia Suecica. No. 217. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Leckie D, Gougeon F, Yu X, Maltamo M. 2008. Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. Int J Remote Sens. 29:1339–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jago AG. 1982. Leadership: perspectives in theory and research. Manag Sci. 28:315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen JJ, Vera D, Crossan M. 2009. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Q. 20:5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson HT. 1992. Relevance regained. New York (NY): The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KN, Scheurman HL. 1977. Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives: discussion and synthesis. Forest Sci. 18:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson B, Jacobsson J, Kallur H. 1993. The forest management planning package. Theory and application. Studia For Suec. 189:56.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson R. 2011. Trends and possible future developments in global forest-product markets – implications for the Swedish forest sector. Forests. 2:147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas J, Loikkanen T, Pukkala T, Pykäläinen J. 1996. A participatory approach to tactical forest planning. Acta For Fenn. 251:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS, Norton DP. 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus Rev. 74:75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurttila M, Pukkala T, Kangas J. 2001. Composing landscape level forest plans for forest areas under multiple private ownership. Boreal Environ Res. 6:285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence P, Lorsch J. 1986. Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lönner G. 1968. A system for short term planning of logging, storing and transportation of wood. Bulletin no. 6. Stockholm: Forskningssstiftelsen Skogsarbeten.
   Google Scholar
• Lönner G. 1973. Långsiktsplanering i skogsbruket [Long-term planning in forestry]. Skogen. 3:183–187.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton A, Ronnqvist M, Ryan D. 1998. The scheduling of forest harvesting with adjacency constraints. In: McNaughton A, editor, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference, Operational Research Society of New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland, Citeseer; p. 28–33. [cited 2013 Mar 6]. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.42.44&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. 2009. Strategy safari: the complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan G. 1986. Images of organisation. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson J, Brodie JD, Sessions J. 1991. Integrating short-term, area-based logging plans with long-term harvest schedules. Forest Sci. 37:101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Eriksson L, Wästerlund D. 2013. Strategy pattern creation in forest planning in Swedish forest-owning companies. Forests. 4:553–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Staal Wästerlund D, Wahlberg O, Eriksson LO. 2012. Forest planning in a Swedish company – a knowledge management analysis of forest information. Silva Fenn. 46:717–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci. 5:14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordstrom EM, Eriksson LO, Ohman K. 2010. Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy Econ. 12:562–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes G. 1988. Hierarchical resource allocation mechanisms in large scale forest planning. In: 1988 Symposium on System Analysis in Forest Resources. USDA For. Serv. GTR-RM-161; p. 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Peters T, Rodabaugh K. 1988. Thriving on chaos: handbook for a management revolution. J Contin High Educ. 36:27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Pykäläinen J, Kangas J, Loikkanen T. 1999. Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences from state owned boreal forests. J Forest Econ. 5:341–364.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn RE, Spreitzer GM. 1997. The road to empowerment: seven questions every leader should consider. Organ Dyn. 26:37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds KM, Twery M, Lexer MJ, Vacik H, Ray D, Shao G, Borges J. 2008. Decision support systems in forest management. In: Burstein F, Holsapple CW, editors, Handbook on decision support systems 2. Berlin: Springer; 800p.
   Google Scholar
• Richards EW, Gunn EA. 2000. A model and tabu search method to optimize stand harvest and road construction schedules. Forest Sci. 46:188–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCA. 2011. Årsredovisning [Internet]. Stockholm. [cited 2013 Mar 6]. Available from http://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CC8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sca.com%2FDocuments%2Fsv%2FAnnual_Reports%2Fsca-arsredovisning-2011-final.pdf&ei=c942UfuwLoOrOqyMgeAC&usg=AFQjCNF6i11OlEyuL8XfIkobLdaOL9RBzg&sig2=KoTM9RjwsQCHWllqShc1BA
   Google Scholar
• Schein EH. 2010. Organizational culture and leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Senge PM. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M. 2005. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecol Manag. 207:171–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm J. 2002. De svenskaskogsbolagens system förskogligplanering [The planning system of Swedish forest companies]. Arbetsrapport no. 98. Umeå: Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Velthouse BA. 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manag Rev. 15:666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Cholaky A. 1991. A hierarchical approach to forest planning. Forest Sci. 37:439–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Davis L. 1996. Hierarchical planning in forest resource management: defining the dimensions of the subject area. In: Martell DL, Davis LS, Weintraub A, editors, Proceedings of a Workshop on Hierarchical Approaches to Forest Management in Public and Private Organizations. Information Report PI-X-124. ISBN 0-662-24108-8. Petwawa: National Forestry Institute; p. 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub A, Guitart S, Kohn V. 1986. Strategic planning in forest industries. Eur J Oper Res. 24:152–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley F, Mintzberg H. 1989. Visionary leadership and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 10:17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickström G, Bendix T. 2000. The “Hawthorne effect” – what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scand J Work Environ Health. 26:363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström P, Edenius L, Elfving B, Eriksson LO, Lämås T, Sonesson J, Öhman K, Wallerman J, Waller C, Klintebäck F. 2011. The Heureka forestry decision support system: an overview. Math Comput Forest Nat-Resour Sci. 3:87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson A. 1998. Empowerment: theory and practice. Pers Rev. 27:40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, David JL. 2002. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model. 153:7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimoto A, Brodie JD, Sessions J. 1994. A new heuristic to solve spatially constrained long-term harvest scheduling problems. Forest Sci. 40:365–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar