The k-nearest neighbor technique with local linear regression

References

• Aha WD. 1997. Lazy learning. Artif Intell Rev. 11:7–10. 10.1023/A:1006538427943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. 1985. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat. 12:171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baffetta F, Corona P, Fattorini L. 2012. A matching procedure to improve k-NN estimation of forest attribute maps. For Ecol Manage. 272:35–50. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baffetta F, Fattorini L, Franceschii S, Corona P. 2009. Design-based approach to k-nearest neighbours technique for coupling field and remotely sensed data in forest surveys. Remote Sens. Environ 113:463–475. 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidenbach J, Nothdurft A, Kändler G. 2010. Comparison of nearest neighbour approaches for small area estimation of tree species-specific forest inventory attributes in central Europe using airborne laser scanner data. Eur J For Res. 129:833–846. 10.1007/s10342-010-0384-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunzel H, Kiefer NM, Vogelsang TJ. 2001. Simple robust testing of hypotheses in nonlinear models. J Am Stat Assoc. 96:1088–1096. 10.1198/016214501753209068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL. 2002. Statistical inference. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers RL, Clark RG. 2012. An introduction to model-based survey sampling with applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chirici G, Corona P, Marchetti M, Mastronardi A, Maselli F, Bottai L, Travaglini D. 2012. K-NN forest: a software for the non-parametric prediction and mapping of environmental variables by the k-nearest neighbors algorithm. Eur J Rem. Sens. 45:433–442. 10.5721/EuJRS20124536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ, Grosse E. 1988. Regression by local fitting: methods, properties, and computational algorithms. J Econom. 37:87–114. 10.1016/0304-4076(88)90077-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Corona P, Chirici G, Marchetti M. 2002. Forest ecosystem inventory and monitoring as a framework for terrestrial natural renewable resource survey programmes. Pl Biosys. 136:69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crookston NL, Finley AO. 2008. yaImpute: an R package for kNN imputation. J Stat Softw. 23:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskelson BNI, Temesgen H, Barrett TM. 2009. Estimating current forest attributes from paneled inventory data using plot-level imputation: a study from the Pacific Northwest. For Sci. 55:64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Eskelson BNI, Temesgen H, Lemay V, Barrett TM, Crookston NL, Hudak AT. 2009. The roles of nearest neighbor methods in imputing missing data in forest inventory and monitoring databases. Scand J For Res. 24:235–246. 10.1080/02827580902870490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faes C, Molenberghs G, Aerts M, Verbeke G, Kenward MG. 2009. The effective sample size and an alternative small-sample degrees-of-freedom method. Am Stat. 63:389–399. 10.1198/tast.2009.08196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazar W. 1959. Program evaluation and review technique. Am Stat. 13:10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer M. 2010. Multivariate copulae. In: Kurowicka D, Joe H, editors. Dependence modeling. Singapore: World Scientific; p. 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. 1915. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 10:507–521.
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Lopez H, Ek AR, Bauer ME. 2001. Estimation and mapping of forest stand density, volume, and cover type using the k-nearest neighbors method. Remote Sens Environ. 77:251–274. 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00209-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat. 19:1–67. 10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Google Scholar
• Gao J, Gijbels I. 2009. Bandwidth selection in nonparametric kernel testing. J Am Stat Assoc. 103:1584–1594. 10.1198/016214508000000968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haara A, Kangas A. 2012. Comparing K nearest neighbours methods and linear regression – is there reason to select one over the other? Math Comp Forest Nat Res Sci. 4:50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Haara A, Maltamo M, Tokola T. 1997. The k-nearest-neighbour method for estimating basal area diameter distribution. Scand J For Res. 12:200–208. 10.1080/02827589709355401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, Franklin J. 2005. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Math Intel. 27:83–85. 10.1007/BF02985802
   Google Scholar
• Holmström H, Fransson JES. 2003. Combining remotely sensed optical and radar data in kNN-estimation of forest variables. For Sci. 49:409–418.
   Google Scholar
• Hudak AT, Crookston NL, Evans JS, Hall DE, Falkowski MJ. 2008. Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data. Remote Sens Environ. 113:289–290. 10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde P, Dubayah R, Walker W, Blair JB, Hofton M, Hunsaker C. 2006. Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy. Remote Sens Environ. 102:63–73. 10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman RJ, Fan Y. 1996. Sample quantiles in statistical packages. Am Stat. 50:361–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila M, Tomppo E. 2001. Selecting estimation parameters for the Finnish multisource National Forest Inventory. Remote Sens Environ. 76:16–32. 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00188-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koistinen P, Holmström L, Tomppo E. 2008. Smoothing methodology for predicting regional averages in multi-source forest inventory. Remote Sens Environ. 112:862–871. 10.1016/j.rse.2007.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMay V, Maedel J, Coops NC. 2008. Estimating stand structural details using nearest neighbor analyses to link ground data, forest cover maps, and Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 112:2578–2591. 10.1016/j.rse.2007.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMay V, Temesgen H. 2005. Comparison of nearest neighbor methods for estimating basal area and stems per hectare using aerial auxiliary variables. For Sci. 51:109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lister AJ, Lister TW. 2006. Post-modeling histogram matching of maps produced using regression trees. In: McRoberts RE, Reams GA, Van Deusen PC, McWilliams WH, editors. USFS Sixth Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium; Sep 21–24; Denver (CO); p. 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentz GG. 1953. Bernstein polynomials. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen S. 2013. An assessment of three variance estimators for the k-nearest neighbour technique. Silva Fenn. 47:19.
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen S, Köhl M. 2006. A better alternative to Wald's test-statistic for simple goodness-of-fit tests under one-stage cluster sampling. For Ecol Manage. 221:123–132. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen S, McRoberts RE, Tomppo E. 2009. Model-based mean square error estimators for k-nearest neighbour predictions and applications using remotely sensed data for forest inventories. Remote Sens Environ. 113:476–488. 10.1016/j.rse.2008.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen S, McRoberts RE, Tomppo E. 2010. A resampling variance estimator for the k-nearest neighbours technique. Can J For Res. 40:648–658. 10.1139/X10-020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen S, Tomppo E, McRoberts RE. 2010. A model-assisted k-nearest neighbour approach to remove extrapolation bias. Scand J For Res. 25:174–184. 10.1080/02827581003667348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltamo M, Kangas A. 1998. Methods based on k-nearest neighbor regression in the prediction of basal area diameter distribution. Can J For Res. 28:1107–1115. 10.1139/x98-085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandallaz D. 2013. Design-based properties of some small-area estimators in forest inventory with two-phase sampling. Can J For Res. 43:441–449. 10.1139/cjfr-2012-0381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maselli F, Chirici G, Bottai L, Corona P, Marchetti M. 2005. Estimation of Mediterranean forest attributes by the application of k-NN procedures to multitemporal Landsat ETM plus images. Int J Remote Sens. 26:3781–3796. 10.1080/01431160500166433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE. 2009. Diagnostic tools for nearest neighbors techniques when used with satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 113:489–499. 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE, Cohen WB, Næsset E, Stehman SV, Tomppo EO. 2010. Using remotely sensed data to construct and assess forest attribute maps and related spatial products. Scand J For Res. 25:340–367. 10.1080/02827581.2010.497496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts RE, Tomppo EO, Finley AO, Heikkinen J. 2007. Estimating areal means and variances of forest attributes using the k-nearest neighbors technique and satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 111:466–480. 10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeur M, Crookston NL, Stage AR. 1995. Most similar neighbor: an improved sampling inference procedure for natural resource planning. For Sci. 41:337–359.
   Google Scholar
• Opsomer JD, Claeskens G, Ranalli MG, Kauermann G, Breidt FJ. 2008. Non-parametric small area estimation using penalized spline regression. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 70:265–286. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paass G. 1985. Statistical record linkage methodology: state of the art and future prospects, Vol. L1 Book 2. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute (ISI).
   Google Scholar
• Packalén P, Temesgen H, Maltamo M. 2012. Variable selection strategies for nearest neighbor imputation methods used in remote sensing based forest inventory. Can J Rem Sens. 38:557–569. 10.5589/m12-046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räty M, Kangas A. 2012. Comparison of k-MSN and kriging in local prediction. For Ecol Manage. 263:47–56. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rencher AC. 1995. Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert D, Wand MP. 1994. Multivariate locally weighted least squares regression. Ann Stat. 22:1346–1370. 10.1214/aos/1176325632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott DW. 1992. Multivariate density estimation: theory, practice and visualization. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker LH. 2003. Fixing the F test for equal variances. Am Stat. 57:105–114. 10.1198/0003130031441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas S, Menon D, Prasad AM. 2006. Multivariate simulation and multimodal dependence modeling of vehicle axle weights with copulas. J Trans Eng. 132:945–955. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:12(945)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage AR, Crookston NL. 2007. Partitioning error components for accuracy-assessment of near-neighbor methods of imputation. For Sci 53:62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Stern H. 1990. Models for distribution on permutations. J Am Stat Assoc. 85:558–564. 10.1080/01621459.1990.10476235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temesgen H, Barrett T, Latta G. 2008. Estimating cavity tree abundance using nearest neighbor imputation methods for western Oregon and Washington forests. Silva Fenn. 42:337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temesgen H, LeMay V, Froese KL, Marshall PL. 2003. Imputing tree-lists from aerial attributes for complex stands of south-eastern British Columbia. For Ecol Manage. 177:285. 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00321-3
   Google Scholar
• Thiébaux HJ, Zwiers FW. 1984. The interpretation and estimation of effective sample size. J Clim Appl Meteor. 23:800–811. 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023%3C0800:TIAEOE%3E2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E. 1991. Satellite image-based national forest inventory of Finland. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing; Vol. 28, Part 7-1. Proceedings of the symposium on global and environmental monitoring, techniques and impacts; Victoria (BC); p. 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E. 2006. The Finnish multi-source national forest inventory – small area estimation and map production. In: Kangas A, Maltamo M, editors. Forest inventory – methodology and applications. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 195–224.
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Halme M. 2004. Using coarse scale forest variables as ancillary information and weighting of variables in k-NN estimation: a genetic algorithm approach. Remote Sens Environ 92:1–20. 10.1016/j.rse.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Heikkinen J, Henttonen HM, Ihalainen A, Katila M, Mäkelä H, Tuomainen T, Vainikainen N. 2011. Designing and conducting a forest inventory – case: 9th National Forest Inventory of Finland. New York: Springer; 272 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ver Hoef JM, Temesgen H. 2013. A comparison of the spatial linear model to nearest neighbor (k-NN) methods for forestry applications. PLoS ONE. 8:e59129. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolter KM. 2007. Introduction to variance estimation. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yim JS, Kim YH, Kim SH, Jeong JH, Shin MY. 2010. Comparison of the k-nearest neighbor technique with geographical calibration for estimating forest growing stock volume. Can J For Res. 41:73–82. 10.1139/X10-132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Shi H. 2004. Local modeling of tree growth by geographically weighted regression. For Sci. 50:225–244.
   Google Scholar