Assessment of motivation and attitudes of forest industry companies toward forest certification in northwestern Russia

References

• Aaker DA. 2001. Strategic market management. 6th ed. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo M, Kant S, Couto L. 2008. Why Brazilian companies are certifying their forests? Forest Policy Econ. 11:579–585. 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL. 2008. Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annu Rev Env Res. 33:187–211. 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.013007.103754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein S. 2011. Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Rev Int Polit Econ. 18:17–51. 10.1080/09692290903173087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capiroso KAE. 2011. Legal and sustainable? An exploratory analysis of the interactions between FSC and EU FLEGT forest regimes [Master's thesis]. The Netherlands: Department of Environmental Sciences Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. 2002. Forest certification (eco-labeling) programs and their policy-making authority: Explaining divergence among North American and European case studies. Forest Policy Econ. 5:225–247. 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00060-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. 2004. Governing through markets: forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cashore B, Van Kooten GC, Vertinsky I, Auld G, Affolderback J. 2003. Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy Econ. 7:53–69. 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerutti, PM, Tacconi L, Nasi R, Lescuyer G. 2011. Legal vs. certified timber: preliminary impacts of forest certification in Cameroon. Forest Policy Econ. 13:184–190. 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Innes JL, Kozak R. 2011. An exploratory assessment of the attitudes of Chinese wood products manufacturers towards forest certification. J Environ Manage. 92: 2984–2992. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MR, & Kozar JS. 2011. Comparing sustainable forest management certifications standards: a meta-analysis. Ecol Soc. 16:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubbage F, Diaz D, Yapura P, Dube F. 2010. Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile. Forest Policy Econ. 12:497–504. 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubbage F, Harou P, Sills E. 2007. Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest Policy Econom. 9:833–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2010. Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010, laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market. [ cited 2012 Jan 10]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/timber_regulation.htm#rules
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2009. FAO yearbook of forest products 2009. [ cited 2012 Mar 14]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i1211m/i1211m00.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment. 2010. Country report: Russian Federation. [ cited 2012 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/al608E/al608E.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• [FSC] Forest Stewardship Council. 2011a. Global FSC certificates: type and distribution. [ cited 2012 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.fsc.org/fileadmin/webdata/public/document_center/powerpoints_graphs/facts_figures/2011-11-15-Global-FSC-Certificates-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [FSC] Forest Stewardship Council. 2011b. List of Russian companies holding a forest management certificates (from 30.12.2011) [ cited 2012 Jan 13]. Available from: http://fsc.ru/upload/fm_2011_12_30.xls List of Russian companies holding chain of custody certificates (from 30.12.2011). Available from: http://fsc.ru/upload/coc_2011_12_30.xls
   Google Scholar
• [FSC] Forest Stewardship Council. 2011c. Laws against illegal timber trade: an opportunity for FSC certification to grow. [ cited 2012 Mar 19]. Available from: http://www.fsc.org/news
   Google Scholar
• FSC AAF policy. 2011. Forest Stewardship Council Annual Administration Fee Policy. FSC-POL-20-005 version1-0. [ cited 2011 Feb 17]. Available from: http://www.fsc.org/fileadmin/web-data/public/document_center/accreditation_documents/certification_bodies/FSC-POL-20-005_V1-0_Annual_Administration_Fee_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Golovina O. 2009. The economic impact of forest management certification in Russia: costs and benefits on the corporate level in the north-west region [master thesis]. Alnarp: SLU, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Howard PH, Allen P. 2010. Beyond organic and fair trade? An analysis of ecolabel preferences in the United States. Rural Sociol. 75:244–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFI (International Forest Industries). 2012. Russia finally joins WTO. [ cited 2012 Jan 18]. Available from: http://www.internationalforestindustries.com/2012/01/12/russia-finally-joins-wto/
   Google Scholar
• Industrial business handbook in Russia. 2012. Otraslevoy biznes-spravochnik predpriyatiy Rossii [Sectoral business directory of companies in Russia]. Russian. [ cited 2012 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.actinfo.ru/forestind
   Google Scholar
• Jayasinghe P, Allen DS, Bull GQ, Kozak, RA. 2007. The status of forest certification in the Canadian value-added wood products manufacturing sector. Forest Chron. 83:113–125. 10.5558/tfc83113-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson J, Lidestav G. 2011. Can voluntary standards regulate forestry? – assessing the environmental impacts of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy Econ. 13:191–198. 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallas A. 2002. Public forest policy making in post-Communist Estonia. Forest Policy Econ. 4:323–332. 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00074-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpachevskiy M, Chuprov V, Ptichnikov A. 2009. Rossiyskiy nacionalniy standart Lesnogo Popechitelskogo Soveta [Russian national standard of Forest Stewardship Council]. Russian. Ustoichivoe lesopolzovanie. 1:10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Karvinen S, Välkky E, Gerasimov Y, Dobrovolsky A. 2011. Northwest Russian Forest Sector in a Nutshell. Sastamala: Finnish Forest Research Institute. Vammalan Kirjapaion Oy; p. 138.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo ECH, Sandström C, Tysiachniouk M, Johansson J. 2009. Local consequences of applying international norms: differences in the application of forest certification in Northern Sweden, Northern Finland, and Northwest Russia. Ecol Soc. 14:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters M, Tikina A, Larson B. 2010. Forest certification audit results as potential changes in forest management in Canada. Forest Chron. 86:455–460. 10.5558/tfc86455-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott CL, Cashore B. 2008. Assessing USGBC's forest certification policy options: a summary report prepared by the Yale Program on Forest Policy and Governance. New Haven (CT): Yale Program on Forest Policy and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott CL, Noah E, Cashore B. 2008. Differences that “matter”? A framework for comparing environmental certification standards and government policies. J Environ Policy Plann. 10:47–70. 10.1080/15239080701652607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers N. 1980. Conversion of tropical moist forests. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nebel G, Quevedo L, Jacobsen JB, Helles F. 2005. Development and economic significance of forest certification: the case of FSC in Bolivia. Forest Policy Econ. 7:175–186. 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00030-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsom D, Bahm V, Cashore B. 2006. Does forest certification matter? An analysis of operation-level changes required during the SmartWood certification process in the United States. Forest Policy Econ. 9:197–208. 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olympstroy. 2011. GK Olympstroy I ANO Orgkomitet Sotchi 2014 podgotovili otchet o vnedrenii zelenych standartov stroitelstva. [Olympstroy and Ogrkomitet Sotchi 2014 released a report regarding implementation of green standards for constructions]. Russian. [cited 2012 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.sc-os.ru/ru/press/news/index.php?id_20 = 1889
   Google Scholar
• Overdevest C, Rickenbach MG. 2006. Forest certification and institutional governance: an empirical study of forest stewardship council certificate holders in the United States. Forest Policy Econ. 9:93–102. 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozinga S. 2004. Footprints in the forest- current practice and future challenges in forest certification. Utrecht: Forests and the European Union Resource Network (FERN).
   Google Scholar
• Pappila M. 2013. Forest certification and trust – different roles in different environments. Forest Policy Econ. 31:37–43. 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [PEFC] Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification. 2011a. Facts & figures. [cited 2012 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.pefc.org/about-pefc/who-we-are/facts-a-figures
   Google Scholar
• [PEFC] Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification. 2011b. PEFC council information register. [cited 2012 Jan 10]. Available from: http://register.pefc.cz/search1.asp
   Google Scholar
• Prokop P, Lešková A, Kubiatko M, Dirand C. 2007. Slovakian students' knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. Int J Sci Edu. 29:895–907. 10.1080/09500690600969830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop P, Prokop M, Tunnicliffe SD. 2007. Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. J Biol Edu. 42:36–39. 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptichnikov A, Park J. 2005. Strengthening Russia's engagement with market-based corporate social responsibility (CSR). Conclusions and Recommendations from Experience in Forestry and Lessons for Other Sectors. World Bank. [cited 2013 Mar 15]. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRUSSIANFEDERATION/Resources/02072006_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ptichnikov AV, Bubko EV, Zagidullina, AT. 2011. Dobrovolnaya lesnaya sertifikaciya [Voluntary forest certification]. Russian. [cited 2012 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.fsc.ru/upload/fsc_ucheb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ratnasingam J, Macpherson TH, Ioras F. 2008. An assessment of Malaysian wooden furniture manufacturers' readiness to embrace chain of custody (COC) certification. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 66:339–343. 10.1007/s00107-008-0255-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuring S, Müller M. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 16:1699–1710. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J, Ahmad M, Ruddell S. 1998. Forest products certification: a survey of manufactures. Forest Prod J. 48:43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teplyakov V, Grigoriev A. 2006. Forest Governance and Illegal Logging: Improving legislation, and Interagency and Inter-stakeholder Relations in Russia. IUCN, Office for the Commonwealth of Independent States. [cited 2013 Mar 18]. Available from: www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/forest/fp_resources/fp_resources_publications/fp_resources_thematic_pubs/fp_resources_governance/?703/Forest-Governance-and-Illegal-Logging
   Google Scholar
• Torniainen T. 2009. Institutions and forest tenure in the Russian forest policy. Dissertationes Forestales. 95:64.
   Google Scholar
• Torniainen T, Saastamoinen O, Petrov A. 2006. Russian forest policy in the turmoil of the changing balance of power. Forest Policy Econ. 9:403–416. 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshiaki O, Juslin H, Rummukainen A, Yoshimura T. 2006. Strategies, functions and benefits of forest certification in wood products marketing: perspectives of Finnish suppliers. Forest Policy Econ. 9:380–391. 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2013. Corruption perception index 2012. [cited 2013 Mar 12]. Available from: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2003. International environmental NGOs: actors of ecological modernization in Russian forest sector. In: Tysiachniouk M, Kulyasov I, Pchelkina S, editors. Ecological modernization of forest sector in Russia and USA. Saint-Petersburg: Research chemistry center of Saint-Petersburg state University; p. 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tysiachniouk M. 2006. Forest certification in Russia. In: Cashore B, Gale F, Meidinger E, Newsom D, editors, Confronting sustainability: forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. Yale (CT): Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Publication Series; p. 261–295.
   Google Scholar
• All about Russian forests. 2000. Sertifikat № 1 vedeniya ustoichivogo lesnogo chozjaistva - na Altae (First FSC certificate indicating sustainable forest management practices in Altay region). Russian. [cited 2012 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.forest.ru/rus/sustainable_forestry/certification/woodmark.html
   Google Scholar
• Vidal N, Kozak R, Cohen D. 2005. Chain of custody certification: an assessment of the North American solid wood sector. Forest Policy Econ. 7:345–355. 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00071-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlosky RP, Gazo R, Cassens D. 2003. Certification involvement by selected United States value-added solid wood products sectors. Wood Fiber Sci. 35:560–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voropaev A. 2011. Itogi oprosa: WWF Rossii byet trevogu. (Survey Results: WWF Russia sounds the alarm (in Russian)). Ustoichivoe lesoupravlenie. 1:42.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson EO. 1988. Biodiversity. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• [WWF] World Wild Fund. 2007. Rossiysko-kitaiskaya torgovlya lesom i nelegal'naya zagotovka drevesiny v Sibiri i na dal'nem vostoke. [Russian-Chinese wood trade and illegal logging in Siberia and Far East]. Russian. [cited 2012 Jan 8]. Available from: http://www.wwf.ru/resources/publ/book/234
   Google Scholar
• Yaroshenko. 2012. Abstracts of the head of Greenpeace forest department Yaroshenko devoted to a roundtable organized by the State Duma Committee of Natural Resources, Environment and Ecology under the theme: “Improving the legal procurement to tackle illegal logging.” [cited 2012 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.forestforum.ru/viewtopic.php?f = 9&t = 11555&view = unread
   Google Scholar