Business model design: new tools for business systems innovation

References

• Ahokangas P, Juntunen M, Myllykoski J. 2013. Cloud computing and transformation of international e-business models. Paper presented at: 8th SKM Symposium & 2nd CBSM Conference: “Competence-based management in cross-border settings: organizational learning, strategy, and governance”; 2013 Sep 18–20; Magdeburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ahokangas P, Myllykoski J. 2014. The practice of creating and transforming a business model. J Bus Models. 2:6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Amit R, Zott C. 2002. Value drivers of e-commerce business models. In: Hitt MA, Amit R, Lucier C, Nixon RD, editors. Creating value: winners in the new business environment. Oxford (UK): Blackwell; 15–47.
   Google Scholar
• Amit R, Zott C. 2012. Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 53:41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer NP, Ghasemzadeh F. 1999. An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int J Proj Manage. 17:207–216. 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5
   Google Scholar
• Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S. 2003. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J Bus Venturing. 18:105–123. 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim BT, Gertler M. 2005. The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR, editors. The Oxford handbook of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 291–317.
   Google Scholar
• Belton V, Stewart TJ. 2001. Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Buehlmann U, Schuler A. 2013. Markets and market forces for secondary wood products. In: Hansen E, Panwar R, Vlosky R, editors. The global forest sector: changes, practices, and prospects. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis; p. 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl J, Börjesson S. 2011. Organizational climate and capabilities for innovation: a study of nine forest-based Nordic manufacturing firms. Scand J For Res. 26:488–500. 10.1080/02827581.2011.585997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumgardner MS, Bush RJ, West CD. 2001. Product development in large furniture companies: a descriptive model with implications for character-marked products. Wood Fiber Sci. 33:302–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom R. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Ind Corp Change. 11:529–555. 10.1093/icc/11.3.529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW. 2003. Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crespell P, Knowles C, Hansen E. 2006. Innovation in the North American sawmilling industry. Forest Sci. 52:568–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganova L, Eyquem-Renault M. 2009. What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Res Policy. 38:1559–1570. 10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing Jr PL, Tarntino W, Pamell GS. 2006. Use of decision analysis in the army base realignment and closure (BRAC) 2005 military value analysis. Decis Anal. 3:33–49. 10.1287/deca.1060.0062
   Google Scholar
• Grabher G. 1993. Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations. In: Grabher G, editor. The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge; p. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson J, Salo A. 2005. Contingent portfolio programming for the management of risky projects. Oper Res. 53:946–956. 10.1287/opre.1050.0225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X. 2013. Marketing sophistication: evidence from the US sawmilling Sector [ PhD dissertation]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Han X, Hansen E, Panwar R, Hamner R, Orozco N. 2013. Connecting market orientation, learning orientation and corporate social responsibility implementation: is innovativeness a mediator? Scand J For Res. 28:784–796. 10.1080/02827581.2013.833290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen E. 2010. The role of innovation in the forest products industry. J Forest. 108:348–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen E, Juslin H. 2011. Strategic marketing in the global forest industries. 2nd ed. Oregon: Corvallis; 327 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen E, Juslin H, Knowles C. 2007. Innovativeness in the global forest products industry: exploring new insights. Can J For Res. 37:1324–1335. 10.1139/X06-323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen EN, Nybakk E, Bull L, Crespell P, Jélvez A, Knowles C. 2011. A multinational investigation of softwood sawmilling innovativeness. Scand J For Res. 26:278–287. 10.1080/02827581.2011.553198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä J, Tyrväinen P, Heikkilä M. 2010. Designing for performance—a technique for business model estimation. In: Seppä M, Helander N, Ilvonen I, editors. Proceedings of EBRF 2010, research forum to understand business in knowledge society. Finland: TUT, JYU, UTA & Aalto University; pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kajanus M, Leskinen P, Kurttila M, Kangas J. 2012. Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis—Lessons learnt in strategic natural resources management. Forest Policy Econ. 20:1–9. 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavengood S. 2011. Identifying best quality management practices for achieving quality and innovation performance in the forest products industry, engineering & technology management. Portland (OR): Portland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A. 2007. Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. Eur J Oper Res. 181:1488–1505. 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino JP. 1995. Research and development project selection. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath RG. 2010. Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Plann. 43:247–261. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason K, Spring M. 2011. The sites and practices of business models. Ind Market Manage. 40:1032–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. 2010. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci CL. 2005. Clarifying business models: origins, present and future of the concept. Comm Assoc Inf Syst. 15:2–40.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• PWC. 2011. Growing the future. Vancouver (BC, Canada): PriceWaterhouseCoopers; 44 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson GB. 1972. The organisation of industry. Econ J. 82:883–896. 10.2307/2230256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries E. 2011. The lean startup: how today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York (NY): Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Salo A, Mild P, Pentikäinen T. 2006. Exploring causal relationships in an innovation program with robust portfolio modeling. Technol Forecast Social Change. 73:1028–1044. 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosna M, Trevinyo-Rodríguez RN, Velamuri SR. 2010. Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the Naturhouse case. Long Range Plann. 43:383–407. 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Binns A, Tushman ML. 2010. Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Plann. 43:448–461. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stendahl M, Roos A, Hugosson M. 2007. Product development in the Swedish and Finnish sawmilling industry—a qualitative study of managerial perceptions. J Forest Prod Bus Res. 4:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stone IJ, Benjamin JG, Leahy JE. 2011. Innovation impacts on biomass supply in Maine's logging industry. Forest Prod J. 61:579–585. 10.13073/0015-7473-61.7.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stummer C, Heidenberger K. 2003. Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 50:175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott D, Lowy A, Ticoll D. 2000. Digital capital: harnessing the power of business webs. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teece DJ. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann. 43:172–194. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thore SA, editor. 2002. Technology commercialization: DEA and related analytical methods for evaluating the use and implementation of technical innovation. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Toppinen A, Wan M, Lähtinen K. 2013. Strategic orientations in the global forest sector. In: Hansen E, Panwar R, Vlosky RP, editors. The global forest sector: changes, practices, and prospects. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor & Francis; p. 405–428.
   Google Scholar
• Ukraenski K, Kajanus M. 2011. Innovation-related knowledge flows: comparative analysis of Finnish and Estonian wood sectors. In: Weiss G, Pettenella D, Ollonqvist P, Slee B, editors. Innovation in forestry. Territorial and value chain relationships. Cambridge: CABI; p. 48–67.
   Google Scholar
• Välimäki H, Niskanen A, Tervonen K, Laurila I. 2004. Indicators of innovativeness and enterprise competitiveness in the wood products industry in Finland. Scand J For Res. 19:90–96. 10.1080/02827580410017898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill P, Vitale MR. 2001. Place to space: migrating to e-business models. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss G, Pettenella D, Ollonqvist P, Slee B, editors. 2011. Innovation in forestry. Territorial and value chain relationships. Cambridge: CABI; p. 331.
   Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R, Massa L. 2011. The business model: recent developments and future research. J Manage. 37:1019–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar