Effects of timing, duration, and intensity of simulated browsing on Scots pine growth and stem quality

References

• Andersson SO. 1954. Funktioner och tabeller för kubering av småträd [Functions and tables for cubing of small trees]. Stockholm (Sweden): Statens skogsforskningsinstitut; p. 45.
   Google Scholar
• Bergquist J, Bergström R, Zakharenka A. 2003. Responses of young Norway spruce (Picea abies) to winter browsing by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): Effects on height growth and stem morphology. Scand J Forest Res. 18:368–376.10.1080/0282758031005431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist J, Löf M, Örlander G. 2009. Effects of roe deer browsing and site preparation on performance of planted broadleaved and conifer seedlings when using temporary fences. Scand J Forest Res. 24:308–317.10.1080/02827580903117420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist J, Örlander G. 1998. Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages – 1. Effect of slash removal, vegetation development, and roe deer density. For Ecol Manage. 105:283–293.10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00297-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist G, Bergström R, Edenius L. 2001. Patterns of stem damage by moose (Alces alces) in young Pinus sylvestris stands in Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 16:363–370.10.1080/02827580119307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist G, Bergström R, Wallgren M. 2013. Summer browsing by moose on Scots pine. Scand J Forest Res. 28:110–116.10.1080/02827581.2012.725767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström R, Bergqvist G. 1997. Frequencies and patterns of browsing by large herbivores on conifer seedlings. Scand J Forest Res. 12:288–294.10.1080/02827589709355412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström R, Hjeljord O. 1987. Moose and vegetation interactions in northwestern Europe and Poland. Swedish Wildl Res. Suppl:1, 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler C, Bräker OU, Bugmann H, Dobbertin M, Rigling A. 2006. Drought as an inciting mortality factor in Scots pine stands of the Valais, Switzerland. Ecosystems. 9:330–343.10.1007/s10021-005-0126-2
   Google Scholar
• Danell K, Bergström R. 1989. Winter browsing by moose on two birch species: impact on food resources. Oikos. 55:11–18.10.2307/3565866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danell K, Bergström R, Edenius L. 1994. Effects of large mammalian browsers on architecture, biomass, and nutrients of woody plants. J Mammal. 75:833–844.10.2307/1382465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danell K, Niemelä P, Varvikko T, Vuorisalo T. 1991. Moose browsing on Scots pine along a gradient of plant productivity. Ecology. 72:1624–1633.10.2307/1940962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenius L, Danell K, Bergström R. 1993. Impact of herbivory and competition on compensatory growth in woody plants: winter browsing by moose on Scots pine. Oikos. 66:286–292.10.2307/3544816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenius L, Danell K, Nyquist H. 1995. Effects of simulated moose browsing on growth, mortality, and fecundity in Scots pine: relations to plant productivity. Can J For Res-Rev Can Rech For. 25:529–535.10.1139/x95-060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill RMA. 1992. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. Forestry. 65:145–169.10.1093/forestry/65.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härkönen S, Miina J, Saksa T. 2008. Effect of cleaning methods in mixed pine–deciduous stands on moose damage to Scots pines in southern Finland. Scand J Forest Res. 23:491–500.10.1080/02827580802491371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä R, Löyttyniemi K. 1992. Growth response of young Scots pines to artificial shoot breaking simulating moose damage. Silva Fenn. 26:19–26.10.14214/sf.a15627
   Google Scholar
• Histol T, Hjeljord O. 1993. Winter feeding strategies of migrating and nonmigrating moose. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool. 71:1421–1428.10.1139/z93-196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hódar JA, Zamora R, Castro J, Gómez JM, García D. 2007. Biomass allocation and growth responses of Scots pine saplings to simulated herbivory depend on plant age and light availability. Plant Ecol. 197:229–238.10.1007/s11258-007-9373-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honkanen T, Haukioja E, Suomela J. 1994. Effects of simulated defoliation and debudding on needle and shoot growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris): implications of plant source/sink relationships for plant-herbivore studies. Funct Ecol. 8:631–639.10.2307/2389926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalkanen A. 2001. The probability of moose damage at the stand level in southern Finland. Silva Fenn. 35:159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankiewicz LS. 1976. Formation of the vegetative shoot and growth correlation. In: Bialobok S, Zelawski W, editors. Outline of physiology of Scots pine. Springfield (VA): US Department of Commerce; p. 243–268.
   Google Scholar
• Kempe G. 2011. Älgskadornas inverkan på volymtillväxt, kvalitet och trädslagssammansättning i landets skogar [Effects of moose browsing damages on volume growth, quality and tree species composition in Swedish forests], Appendix 3. In: Bergquist J, Kalén C, Berglund H, editors. Hjortdjurens inverkan på tillväxt av produktionsträd och rekrytering av betesbegärliga trädslag – problembeskrivning, orsaker och förslag till åtgärder [Influence of cervids on growth of production trees and recruitment of preferred forage species – problem description, causes and suggested measures]. Report 9:2011. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsens förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Löyttyniemi K. 1985. On repeated browsing of Scots pine saplings by moose (Alces alces). Silva Fenn. 19:387–391.10.14214/sf.a15431
   Google Scholar
• Månsson J, Andrén H, Pehrson A, Bergström R. 2007. Moose browsing and forage availability: a scale-dependent relationship? Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool. 85:372–380.10.1139/Z07-015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan HT, Koricheva J. 2013. Effects of tree species richness and composition on moose winter browsing damage and foraging selectivity: an experimental study. J Anim Ecol. 82:739–748.10.1111/1365-2656.12049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund M. 1947. Funktioner och tabeller för kubering av stående träd. Tall och gran och björk i södra Sverige samt i hela landet [Functions and tables for cubing of standing trees. Pine, spruce and birch in southern Sweden, as well as in the whole country]. Stockholm (Sweden): Statens skogsforskningsinstitut; p. 81.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Albrektson A. 1993. Productivity of needles and allocation of growth in young Scots pine trees of different competitive status. For Ecol Manage. 62:173–187.10.1016/0378-1127(93)90049-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson IL, Bergström R, Danell K. 2007. Browse biomass production and regrowth capacity after biomass loss in deciduous and coniferous trees: responses to moose browsing along a productivity gradient. Oikos. 116:1639–1650.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15946.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson IL, Danell K, Bergström R. 2005. Different moose densities and accompanied changes in tree morphology and browse production. Ecol Appl. 15:1296–1305.10.1890/04-0499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson T, Andersson B, Ericsson T. 2010. Relationship between autumn cold hardiness and field performance in northern Pinus sylvestris. Silva Fenn. 44:255–266.10.14214/sf.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson F, Bergström R, Jernelid H, Lavsund S, Wilhelmsson L. 2010. Älgbetning och tallens volymproduktion – resultat från en 28-årig studie i Furudal [Long-term effects of moose browsing on Scots pine]. Gävle: GO AB.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2 user's guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2012. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Ithaca (NY): Microcomputer Power.
   Google Scholar
• Wallgren M, Bergström R, Bergqvist G, Olsson M. 2013. Spatial distribution of browsing and tree damage by moose in young pine forests, with implications for the forest industry. For Ecol Manage. 305:229–238.10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar