Variation in phloem resistance of Norway spruce clones and families to Heterobasidion parviporum and Ceratocystis polonica and its relationship to phenology and growth traits

References

• Arnerup J, Swedjemark G, Elfstrand M, Karlsson B, Stenlid J. 2010. Variation in growth of Heterobasidion parviporum in a full-sib family of Picea abies. Scand J For Res. 25:106–110. 10.1080/02827581003730799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtberg PO, Johansson M, Seeger P. 1996. Effects of season and urea treatment on infection of stumps of Picea abies by Heterobasidion annosum in stands on former arable land. Scand J For Res. 11:261–268. 10.1080/02827589609382935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignolas F, Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Christiansen E, Berryman AA. 1998. Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Can J For Res. 28:720–728. 10.1139/cjfr-28-5-720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen E, Bakke A. 1989. The spruce bark beetle Ips typographus – a review of our present knowledge. Research Paper No. 4/89, Ås (Norway): Norwegian Forest Research Institute; p. 21. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen E, Berryman AA. 1995. Studies of resistance in Norway spruce to bark beetle-fungus infection. In: Christiansen E, editor. Bark beetles, blue stain fungi, and conifer defence systems. Aktuelt fra Skogforsk 6/95. Ås (Norway): Norwegian Forest Research Institute; p. 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen E, Krokene P, Berryman AA, Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Lieutier F, Lönneborg A, Solheim H. 1999. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 19:399–403. 10.1093/treephys/19.6.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson M, Lundén K, Elfstrand M, Hu J, Zhao T, Arnerup J, Ihrmark K, Swedjemark G, Borg-Karlsson AK, Stenlid J. 2011. Chemical and transcriptional responses of Norway spruce genotypes with different susceptibility to Heterobasidion spp. infection. BMC Plant Biol. 11:154. 10.1021/jf011429s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson GE. 1969. Techniques for research in quantitative animal genetics. In: Techniques and procedures in animal science research. Albany (NY): American Society of Animal Science; p. 36–79.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitri L. 1974. Resistenzforschung bei der Fichte gegenüber dem Fomes annosus [Resistance research in spruce in relation to Fomes annosus]. In: Kuhlman EG, editor. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Fomes annosus; September 17–22; Athens, GA. Asherville (NC): USDA Forest Service; p. 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitri L. 1980. Untersuchungen über die Widerstandsfähigkeit der Fichte (Picea abies Karst.) gegenüber dem Wurzelschwamm Fomes annosus (Fr.) Cooke [Investigation of resistance in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) to the root rot fungus Fomes annosus (Fr.) Cooke]. Göttingen: Schriftr. Forstl. Fak. University; p. 1–126.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitri L, Schumann G. 1989. Further experiments on the host/parasite relationship between Norway spruce and Heterobasidion annosum. In: Morrison DJ, editor. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Vernon and Victoria, BC; 1988 Aug 9–16; Forestry Canada, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria B. C. Canada; p. 171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson G. 2010. Picea abies [Recent genetic research]. Uppsala: Department of Plant Biology and Forest Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, p. 192.
   Google Scholar
• Furniss MM, Solheim H, Christiansen E. 1990. Transmission of blue-stain fungi by Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Norway spruce. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 83:712–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietala AM, Eikenes M, Kvaalen H, Solheim H, Fossdal CG. 2003. Multiplex real-time PCR in monitoring Heterobasidion annosum colonization in Norway spruce clones differing in disease resistance. Appl Env Microbiol. 69:4413–4420. 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4413-4420.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horntvedt R, Christiansen E, Wang S, Solheim H. 1983. Artificial inoculation with Ips typographus-associated blue stain fungi can kill healthy Norway spruce trees. Medd Nor Inst Skogforsk. 38:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson B, Swedjemark G. 2006. Genotypic variation in natural infection frequency of Heterobasidion spp. in a Picea abies clone trial in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 21:108–114. 10.1080/02827580500529969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson B, Tsopelas P, Zamponi L, Capretti P, Soulioti N, Swedjemark G. 2008. Susceptibility to Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies clones grown in different environments. For Path. 38:83–89. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2008.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krokene P, Lahr E, Dalen LS, Skrøppa T, Solheim H. 2012. Effect of phenology on susceptibility of Norway spruce (Picea abies) to fungal pathogens. Plant Path. 61:57–62. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krokene P, Solheim H. 1997. Growth of four bark-beetle-associated blue-stain fungi in relation to the induced wound response in Norway spruce. Can J Bot. 75:618–625. 10.1139/b97-069
   Google Scholar
• Krokene P, Solheim H. 1998. Phytopathogenicity of four blue-stain fungi associated with aggressive and non-aggressive bark beetles. Phytopathol. 88:39–44. 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.1.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutzsch P. 1973. Norway spruce. Development of buds. IUFRO 2.02.11; p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kvaalen H, Solheim H. 2000. Co-inoculation of Ceratosystis polonica and Heterobasidion annosum with callus of two Norway spruce clones with different in vivo susceptibility. Plant Cell, Tissue and Org Cult. 60:221–228. 10.1023/A:1006407726299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfern DB, Stenlid J. 1998. Spore dispersal and infection. In: Woodward S, Stenlid J, Karjalainen R, Hüttermann A, editors. Heterobasidion annosum. Biology, ecology, impact and control. Oxon (NY): CAB International; p. 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Roll-Hansen F, Roll-Hansen H. 1980. Microorganisms which invade Picea abies in seasonal stem wounds. I. General aspects. Hymenomycetes. Eur J For Path. 10:321–339. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1980.tb00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Skrøppa T, Magnussen S. 1993. Provenance variation in shoot growth components in Norway spruce. Silvae Genet. 42:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim H. 1992a. The early stages of fungal invasion in Norway spruce infested by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Can J Bot. 70:1–5. 10.1139/b92-001
   Google Scholar
• Solheim H. 1992b. Fungal succession in sapwood of Norway spruce infested by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Eur J For Path. 22:136–148. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1992.tb01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim H, Huse, KJ, Venn K. 1994. A nation-wide inventory of root and butt rot in the annual cuttings of spruce in Norway. In: Johansson M, Stenlid J, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Root and Butt rots. Wiik, Sweden and Haikko, Finland; 1993 Aug 9–16; IUFRO Working Party S2.06.01. Uppsala (Sweden): Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; p. 618–623.
   Google Scholar
• Stenlid J, Redfern DB. 1998. Spread within the tree and stand. In: Woodward S, Stenlid J, Karjalainen R, Hüttermann A, editors. Heterobasidion annosum. Biology, ecology, impact and control. Oxon (NY): CAB International; p. 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G. 1995. Heterobasidion annosum root rot in Picea abies: variability in aggressiveness and resistance. [Ph.D. thesis]. Uppsala (Sweden): Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Karlsson B. 2004. Genotypic variation in susceptibility following artificial Heterobasidion annosum inoculation of Picea abies clones in a 17-year-old field test. Scand J For Res. 19:103–111. 10.1080/02827580310018032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Karlsson B, Stenlid J. 2007. Exclusion of Heterobasidion parviporum from inoculated clones of Picea abies and evidence of systemic induced resistance. Scand J For Res. 19:110–117. 10.1080/02827580701262774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Stenlid J. 1996. Variation in spread of Heterobasidion annosum in clones of Picea abies grown at different vegetation phases under greenhouse conditions. Scand J For Res. 11:137–144. 10.1080/02827589609382921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Stenlid J. 1997. Between-tree and between-isolate variation for growth of S-group Heterobasidion annosum in sapwood of Picea abies cuttings. Can J For Res. 27:711–715. 10.1139/x96-191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Stenlid J, Karlsson B. 1997. Genetic variation among clones of Picea abies in resistance to growth of Heterobasidion annosum. Silvae Genet. 46:369–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Stenlid J, Karlsson B. 2001. Variation in growth of Heterobasidion annosum among clones of Picea abies incubated for different periods of time. For Path. 31:163–175. 10.1046/j.1439-0329.2001.00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Weissenberg K. 1975. Variation in relative resistance to spread of Fomes annosus in four clones of Picea abies. Eur J For Pathol. 5:112–117. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1975.tb00452.x
   Google Scholar