Comparison of tree volume equations for small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) in the Czech Republic

References

• Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 19:716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alegria C, Tomé M. 2011. A set of models for individual tree merchantable volume prediction for Pinus pinaster Aiton in central inland of Portugal. Eur J For Res. 130:871–879. 10.1007/s10342-011-0479-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. 1976. Whole stem cubic meter volume equations and tables. Centimeter diameter class merchantable volume factors. Victoria (BC): British Columbia Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Anta MB, Diéguez-Aranda U, Castedo-Dorado F, Gonzáles JGÁ, von Gadow K. 2007. Merchantable volume system for pedunculate oak in northwestern Spain. Ann For Sci. 64:511–520. 10.1051/forest:2007028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockmann T. 1991. Yield table for linden (Tilia-cordata Mill) in lower Saxony and North Hesse. Allg Forst Jagdztg. 162:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børset O. 1954. Volume computation of standing aspen. Commun Norweigan For Assoc. 43:397–447.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks JR, Jiang L, Ozçelik R. 2008. Compatible stem volume and taper equations for Brutian pine, Cedar of Lebanon, and Cilicica fir in Turkey. For Ecol Manag. 256:147–151. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools N, Vesterdal L, Vos De B, Vanguelova E, Hansen K. 2014. Tree species is the major factor explaining C:N ratios in European forest oils. For Ecol Manag. 311:3–16. 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fér F. 1994. Forest dendrology 2nd part, deciduous trees. Písek: VŠZ and Matice lesnická s.r.o; p. 132–138.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler G, Hussain N. 1987. Individual tree volume equations for aspen in Michigan. Michigan: University of Michigan; p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelm B, Johansson T. 2012. Volume equations for poplars growing on farmland in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 27:561–566. 10.1080/02827581.2012.679678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husch B, Beers TW, Kershaw JA. 2003. Forest mensuration. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; p. 443.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob M, Viedenz K, Polle A, Thomas FM. 2010. Leaf litter decomposition in temperate deciduous forest stands with a decreaing fraction of beech (Fagus sylvatica). Oecologia. 164:1083–1094. 10.1007/s00442-010-1699-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Brooks JR. 2008. Taper, volume, and weight equations for red pine in west virginia. North J Appl For. 25:151–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Brooks JR, Wang J. 2005. Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in West Virginia. For Ecol Manag. 213:399–409. 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriebitzsch WU, Bültmann H, Oheimb G, Schmidt M, Thiel H, Ewald, J. 2013. Forest-specific diversity of vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens. In: Kraus D, Krumm F, editors. Integrative approach on an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. Freiburg: European Forest Institute; p. 158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kurinobu S, Prehatin D, Mohanmad N, Matsune K. 2007. A stem taper equation compatible to volume equation for Paraserianthes falcataria in Pare, East Java, Indonesia: its implications for the plantation management. J For Res. 12:473–478. 10.1007/s10310-007-0037-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Weiskittel AR. 2010. Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region. Ann For Sci. 67:302. 10.1051/forest/2009109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madricht MD, Cardinale BJ. 2007. Impact of tree species diversity on litter decomposition in northern temperate forests of Wisconsin, USA: a multi-site experiment along a latitudinal gradient. Plant Soil. 292:147–159. 10.1007/s11104-007-9209-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neirynck J, Mirtcheva S, Sioen G, Lust N. 2000. Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physic-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil. For Ecol Manag. 133:275–286. 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00240-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norden U. 1994. Influence of tree species on acidification and mineral pools in deciduous forest soil of South Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut. 76:363–381. 10.1007/BF00482713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleksa A. 2009. Conservation and ecology of the hermit beetle Osmoderma eremita s.I. in Poland. 5th Conference on Saproxylic Beetles; 2008 June 14–16; Leuphana University, Institute Ecol & Environmental Chemistry, Luneburg, Germany; Sofia: Pensoft Series Faunistica, Vol. 89, p. 177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Perez D, Kanninen M. 2003. Provisional equations for estimating total and merchantable volume of Tectona grandis trees in Costa Rica. For Trees Livelihoods. 13:345–359. 10.1080/14728028.2003.9752470
   Google Scholar
• Perez D. 2007. Growth and volume equations developed from stem analysis for Tectona grandis in Costa Rica. J Trop For Sci. 20:66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petráš R, Pajtík J. 1991. Sústava česko-slovenských objemových tabuliek drevín [Set of czech-slovak volume tables of tree species]. Lesnícky časopis. 37:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson AP, Froese RE. 2004. Model validation using equivalence tests. Ecol Model. 176:349–358. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupšys R, Petrauskas E. 2010. Development of q-exponential models for tree height, volume and stem profile. Int J Phys Sci. 5:2369–2378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher F, Hall F. 1933. Logarithm expression of timber-tree volume. J Agr Res. 47:719–734.
   Google Scholar
• Spurr SH. 1952. Forest inventory. New York: The Ronald Press Co.
   Google Scholar
• Statsoft. 2012: Statistica 12. Tulsa: Statsoft Inc., p. 1984–2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tarp-Johansen MJ, Skovsgaard JP, Madsen SF, JohannsenVK, Skovgaard I. 1997. Compatible stem taper and stem volume functions for oak (Quercus robur and Q. petraea (Matt) Liebl) in Denmark. Ann For Sci. 54:577–595. 10.1051/forest:19970701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÚHÚL. 2001a. Regional plan of forest development for the Forest Natural Area No.10 – Středočeská pahorkatina. Brandýs nad Labem: Forest Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ÚHÚL. 2001b. Regional plan of forest development for the Forest Natural Area No. 4 – Doupovské hory. Brandýs nad Labem: Forest Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ÚLT. 1951. Volume tables ÚLT. Brandýs nad Labem: Czechoslovak State Forests – Forest technical main office.
   Google Scholar
• Vallet P, Dhôte JF, Moguédec GL, Ravart M, Pignard G. 2006. Development of total above-ground volume equations for seven important forest tree species in France. For Ecol Manag. 229:98–110. 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay JK. 1991. Tree volume equations for slash pine. Research Note No. 43. Queensland: Queensland Forest Service; p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Větvička V. 2004. European trees. Praha: Aventinum; p. 215.
   Google Scholar
• Wellek S. 2003. Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; p. 284.
   Google Scholar
• Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Menuccini M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fenn Monogr. 4:63.
   Google Scholar