Forest owner is more than her goal: a qualitative typology of Lithuanian owners

References

• Bengston DN, Asah ST, Butler BJ. 2011. The diverse values and motivations of family forest owners in the United States: an analysis of an open ended question in the national woodland owner survey. Small-scale For. 10:339–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss JC, Martin AJ. 1989. Identifying NIPF management motivations with qualitative methods. Forest Sci. 35:601–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas V, Felton A, Lindbladh M, Sallnäs O. 2013. Linking forest management, policy and biodiversity indicators – A comparison of Lithuania and Southern Sweden. Forest Ecol Manag. 291:181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Brukas V, Kuliešis A, Sallnäs O, Linkevicius E. 2011. Resource availability, planning rigidity and Realpolitik in Lithuanian forest utilization. Nat Resour Forum. 35:77–88. 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas V, Sallnäs O. 2012. Forest management plan as a policy instrument: carrot, stick or sermon? Land Use Policy. 29:605–613. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brukas V, Weber N. 2009. Forest management after the economic transition – At the crossroads between German and Scandinavian traditions. For Policy Econ. 11:586–592. 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhubhain AN, Cobanova R, Karppinen H, Mizaraite D, Ritter E, Slee B, Wall S. 2007. The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. Small-scale For. 6:347–357.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot J. 2005. Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman LA. 1961. Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat. 32:148–170. 10.1214/aoms/1177705148
   Google Scholar
• Häggqvist P, Lejon SB, Lidestav G. 2014. Look at what they do – A revised approach to communication strategy towards private forest owners. Scand J For Res. 29:697–706.
   Google Scholar
• Hokajärvi R, Hujala T, Leskinen LA, Tikkanen J. 2009. Effectiveness of sermon policy instruments: Forest management planning practices applying the activity theory approach. Silva Fenn. 43:889–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugosson M, Ingemarson F. 2004. Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; theoretical modelling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fenn. 38:217–231. 10.14214/sf.430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hujala T, Pykalainen J, Tikkanen J. 2007. Decision making among Finnish non-industrial private forest owners: the role of professional opinion and desire to learn. Scand J For Res. 22:454–463.
   Google Scholar
• Hujala T, Tikkanen J. 2008. Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. Scand J For Res. 23:466–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hujala T, Tikkanen J, Hanninen H, Virkkula O. 2009. Family forest owners’ perception of decision support. Scand J For Res. 24:448–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskelevičius K. 2011. Ekonomikos šešėlio lyderiai – privatūs miškai [Private forests are the leaders of economic shade]. Grynas.lt. [cited 2014 Oct 14]. Available from: http://grynas.delfi.lt/aplinka/kjaskelevicius-ekonomikos-seselio-lyderiai-privatus-miskai.d?id=50416680
   Google Scholar
• Kardelis K. 1997. Kiekybiniai ir kokybiniai tyrimai [Quantitative and qualitative research]. In: Kardelis K, editor. Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir tyrimų metodai: vadovėlis [The methodology and methods of scientific research: handbook]. Kaunas: Technologija; pp. 270–300.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz WB, Lewis BJ. 1981. Decision-making framework for nonindustrial private forest owners: an application in the Missouri Ozarks. J Forest. 79:285–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laučius V. 2011. A. Knystautas: miškai turi likti Lietuvai [A. Knystautas: Lithuanian forests must remain public]. Grynas.lt. [cited 2014 Oct 14]. Available from: http://grynas.delfi.lt/aplinka/aknystautas-miskai-turi-likti-lietuvai.d?id=46653651
   Google Scholar
• Lazdinis M, Carver A, Schmithüsen F, Tõnisson K, L. 2005. Forest-sector concerns in the Baltic States: implications for an expanded European Union. Soc Nat Res. 18:839–848. 10.1080/08941920500205517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki M, Matilainen A. 2014. Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland. Scand J For Res. 29:101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidestav G, Lejon SB. 2012. Harvesting and silvicultural activities in Swedish family forestry – Behaviour changes from a gender perspective. Scand J For Res. 28:136–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt L. 1997. Non-industrial private forest owners’ decision process: a qualitative study about goals, time perspective, opportunities and alternatives. Scand J For Res. 12:302–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt L, Törnqvist T. 1990. The owner, the estate and external influences: nonindustrial private forest owners’ management decisions report 14. Uppsala: SLU.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. 2012. Lietuvos miškų ūkio statistika 2000-2012 [Lithuanian statistical yearbook of forestry 2000–2012]. Kaunas: Lututė.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment. 2013. Lietuvos gyventojų sociologinės apklausos svarbiausiais miškų ūkio klausimais bei respondentų nuomonės analizės atlikimas: Ataskaita [Sociological survey of Lithuanian citizens on most relevant forestry issues and analysis of respondent's opinions: report]. Vilnius: JSC Eurosprendimai.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaraitė D. 2001. Privačių miškų savininkų ūkininkavimo tikslai, problemos ir poreikiai bei juos leminatys veiksniai [Forest management in private forests: objectives, problems and influencing factors]. Miškininkystė. 1:33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaraitė D, Mizaras S. 2005a. The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with economies in transition: observations from Lithuania. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy. 4:437–450.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaraitė D, Mizaras S. 2005b. Empirically based grouping in private forest owners in Lithuania. Balt For. 11:80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaraitė D, Mizaras S, Sadauskienė L. 2010. Lithuanian private forestry: situation, tendencies and problems. Balt For. 16:296–302.
   Google Scholar
• Mizaras S, Aleinikovas M, Mizaraite D. 2006. Lietuvos gyventojų sociologinės apklausos svarbiausiais miškų ūkio klausimais bei respondentų nuomonės analizės atlikimas: Ataskaita [Sociological survey of Lithuanian citizens on most relevant forestry issues and analysis of respondent's opinions: Report]. Girionys: Lithuanian Forest Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Novais A, Canadas MJ. 2010. Understanding the management logic of private forest owners: a new approach. Forest Policy Econ. 12:173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivoriūnas A, Lazdinis M. 2004. Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy. 3:191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Stanislovaitis A, Brukas V, Činga G. 2011. Controlling private forest owners in Lithuania: rigid regulation or advisory counselling? Proceedings of rural development conference; 2011 Nov 24–25; ASU: Akademija. 5:133–138.
   Google Scholar
• State Forest Service. 2013. Lietuvos miškų statisktika 2013 [Lithuanian statistical yearbook of forestry 2013]. Kaunas: Lututė.
   Google Scholar
• State Forest Service. 2014. Lietuvos privačių miško valdų analizė [Analysis of private forest estates in Lithuania]. Amvmt.lt. [cited 2014 Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.amvmt.lt/Images/Veikla/Stat/Privaciu_misku_statistika/2014_01_01/Lietuvos%20privaciu%20misko%20valdu%20anali.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart J, Courtney P, Slee B. 2010. Private ownership and public good provision in English woodlands. Small-scale For. 9:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingriene V. 2013. Nuomonė Privačių miškų savininkų galvose – tik pelnas [Opinion only profits in the heads of private forest owners]. Grynas.lt. [cited 2014 Jan 17]. Available from: http://grynas.delfi.lt/aplinka/nuomone-privaciu-misku-savininku-galvose-tik-pelnas.d?id=62488495
   Google Scholar
• Vingrienė V. 2014. Liūdni vaizdai Kermušijos miškuose: ar tikrai jau pribrendome tapti miškų savininkais? [Sad scenery in the forests of Kermušija: have we really reached the maturity to become forest owners?]. Zali.lt. [cited 2014 Oct 14]. Available from: http://zali.lt/miskai/liudni-vaizdai-kermusijos-miskuose-ar-tikrai-jau-pribrendome-tapti-misku-savininkais/
   Google Scholar