Detecting spruce and fir log diameter under bark by using shape and image data

References

• Altherr E, Unfried P, Hradetzky J, Hradetzky V. 1978. Statistische Rindenbeziehungen als Hilfsmittel zur Ausformung und Aufmessung unentrindeten Stammholzes. Teil IV: Fichte, Sitkafichte, Tanne, Douglasie. [Statistical bark relationships to support the bucking and measuring of logs in bark. Part IV: spruce, Sitka spruce, fir, Douglas fir]. Freiburg: Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg (90).
   Google Scholar
• Breinig L, Brüchert F, Baumgartner R, Sauter UH. 2012. Measurement of knot width in CT images of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) – evaluating the accuracy of an image analysis method. Comput Electron Agric. 85:149–156.10.1016/j.compag.2012.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiorescu S, Grundberg S. 2001. The influence of missing bark on measurements performed with a 3D log scanner. Forest Prod J. 51:78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzler JK, Weidenhiller A, Golser M. 2013. Comparison of different approaches for automatic bark detection on log images. Wood Sci Technol. 47:749–761.10.1007/s00226-013-0536-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund J. 2004. Automatic grading of softwood sawlogs for pricing using external geometry. Scand J Forest Res. 19:38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flodin J, Oja J, Grönlund A. 2008. Fingerprint traceability of logs using the outer shape and the tracheid effect. Forest Prod J. 58:21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudiceandrea F, Ursella E, Vicario E. 2011. A high speed CT scanner for the sawmill industry. In: Divos F, editor. 17th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, Vol. 1; 2011 Sep 14th–16th; Sopron (Hungary): University of West Hungary; p. 105–112. ISBN 978-963-9883-81-9.
   Google Scholar
• Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 3:610–621.10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jähne B. 1997. Digital image processing: concepts, algorithms, and scientific applications. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson E, Johansson D, Skog J, Fredriksson M. 2013. Automated knot detection for high speed computed tomography on Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. using ellipse fitting in concentric surfaces. Comput Electron Agric. 96:238–245.10.1016/j.compag.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson L, Ringström L. 1993. Method and apparatus for detecting bark and for determining the degree of barking on wood and chips. United States Patent No. 5,274,244.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson M. 2004. Wet storage of roundwood: effects on wood properties and treatment of run-off water. Umeå: Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae Silvestria 319, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Liese W. 1984. Wet storage of windblown conifers in Germany. N.Z. J Forest. 29:119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Lin W, Wang J, Thomas E. 2011. Development of A 3D Log sawing optimization system for small sawmills in central Appalachia, US. Wood Fiber Sci. 43:379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB 2010. Natick, MA: The Mathworks.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson D, Edlund U. 2005. Pine and spruce roundwood species classification using multivariate image analysis on bark. Holzforschung. 59:689–695.10.1515/HF.2005.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmark U. 2005. Value recovery and production control in bucking, log sorting, and log breakdown. Forest Prod J. 55:73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström J. 2003. Automatic measurement of fiber orientation in softwoods by using the tracheid effect. Comput Electron Agric. 41:91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oja J, Grundberg S, Fredriksson J, Berg P. 2004. Automatic grading of sawlogs: a comparison between X-ray scanning, optical three-dimensional scanning and combinations of both methods. Comput Electron Agric. 19:89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Oja J, Grundberg S, Grönlund A. 1998. Measuring the outer shape of Pinus Sylvestris saw logs with an X-ray logscanner. Scand J Forest Res. 13:340–347.10.1080/02827589809382993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oja J, Wallbäcks L, Grundberg S, Hägerdal E, Grönlund A. 2003. Automatic grading of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sawlogs using an industrial X-ray log scanner. Comput Electron Agric. 41:63–75.10.1016/S0168-1699(03)00042-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm C. 2004. Color texture classification by integrative co-occurrence matrices. Pattern Recogn. 37:965–976.10.1080/02827580310019563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2012. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rössler G. 2008. Wie viel Rindenabzug? Schönbrunner Tabellen aus Baden-Württemberg. [How much bark deduction?]Holzkurier. 63:26.
   Google Scholar
• Skatter S. 1998. Determination of cross-sectional shape of softwood logs from three x-ray projections using an elliptical model. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff. 56:179–186.10.1007/s001070050295
   Google Scholar
• Skatter S, Høibø O, Gjerdrum P. 1998. Simulated yield in a sawmill using different measurement technologies. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff. 56:267–274.10.1007/s001070050317
   Google Scholar
• Weidenhiller A, Denzler JK. 2014. On the suitability of colour and texture analysis for detecting the presence of bark on a log. Comput Electron Agric. 106:42–48.10.1016/j.compag.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacco P. 1974. The bark thickness of saw logs. Rept. No. R 90. Stockholm: Swedish Royal College of Forestry, Department of Forest Products; p. 87. Swedish with English Summary.
   Google Scholar