Effects of planting time on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to Norway spruce seedlings

References

• Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann Bot Fenn. 5:169–211.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Uria P, Körner C. 2007. Low temperature limits root growth in deciduous and evergreen temperate tree species. Funct Ecol. 21:211–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund N, Nordlander G, Bylund H. 2003. Host-plant acceptance on mineral soil and humus by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.). Agric Forest Entomol. 5:61–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day KR, Nordlander G, Kenis M, Halldórsson G. 2004. Chapter 14: General biology and life cycles of bark. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire J-C, Evans HF, editors. Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 331–349.
   Google Scholar
• Eidmann HH. 1969. Rüsselkäferschäden an verschiedenen nahrungspflanzen. Anzeiger für schädlingskunde und pflanzenschutz, Paul Parey, Berlin und Hamburg. 42:22–26. German.
   Google Scholar
• Eidmann HH, Von Sydow F. 1989. Stockings for protection of containerized conifer seedlings against pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) damage. Scand J Forest Res. 4:537–547. doi: 10.1080/02827588909382586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol. 167:353–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giurca A, von Stedingk H. 2014. FSC pesticides policy in Sweden. Sweden: Report Forest Stewardship Council.
   Google Scholar
• Grossnickle SC. 2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forest. 30:273–294. doi: 10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen KH. 2011. Snutebilleskader på Øst-og Sørlandet 2010. Rapport fra Skog og landskap: 14 pp. Norwegian with English summary.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Nilsson U, Örlander G. 2012. A comparison of long-term effects of scarification methods on the establishment of Norway spruce. Forestry. 86:91–98. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cps062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Flanagan AM, Owens JN. 1985. Root growth and root growth capacity of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedlings. Can J Forest Res. 15:625–630. doi: 10.1139/x85-102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohmann K. 2000. Voksbehandling av rothalsen på skogplanter som alternativ til insekticider som brukes mot insektgnag etter utplanting. Rapport fra skogforskningen 5/00: 15 pp. Norwegian.
   Google Scholar
• Långström B, Day KR. 2004. Damage, control and management of weevil pests, especially Hylobius abietis. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire J-C, Evans HF, editors. Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 414–444.
   Google Scholar
• Leather SR, Day KR, Salisbury AN. 1999. The biology and ecology of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera : Curculionidae): a problem of dispersal? Bull Entomol Res. 89:3–16. doi: 10.1017/S0007485399000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström A, Hellqvist C, Gyldberg B, Långström B, Mattson A. 1986. Field performance of a protective collar against damage by Hylobius abietis. Scand J Forest Res. 1:3–15. doi: 10.1080/02827588609382396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoranen J, Helenius P, Huttunen L, Rikala R. 2007. Short-day treatment enhances root egress of summer-planted Picea abies seedlings under dry conditions. Scand J Forest Res. 22:384–389. doi: 10.1080/02827580701551382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoranen J, Rikala R. 2013. Field performance of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings planted in disc trenched or mounded sites over an extended planting season. New Forest. 44:147–162. doi: 10.1007/s11056-012-9307-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoranen J, Rikala R, Konttinen K, Smolander H. 2006. Summer planting of Picea abies container-grown seedlings: effects of planting date on survival, height growth and root egress. Forest Ecol Manage. 237:534–544. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyr H, Hoffman G. 1967. Growth rates and growth periodicity of tree roots. Int rev Forest Res. 2:181–236. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4831-9976-4.50011-X
   Google Scholar
• Månsson PE, Schlyter F. 2004. Hylobius pine weevils adult host selection and antifeedants: feeding behaviour on host and non-host woody Scandinavian plants. Agric Forest Entomol. 6:165–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2004.00217.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen, A. 1999. National atlas of Norway: vegetation. Hønefoss: Norwegian Mapping Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Luoranen J, Kolström T, Örlander G, Puttonen P. 2010. Reforestation with planting in northern Europe. Scand J Forest Res. 25:283–294. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.498384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlander G, Hellqvist C, Johansson K, Nordenhem H. 2011. Regeneration of European boreal forests: effectiveness of measures against seedling mortality caused by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Forest Ecol Manage. 262:2354–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlander G, Nordenhem H, Bylund H. 1997. Oviposition patterns of the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Entomol Exp Appl. 85:1–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Gemmel P, Wilhelmsson C. 1991. Effects of scarification, planting depth and planting spot on seedling establishment in a low humidity area in southern Sweden. Report No. 33. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Nordlander G, Wallertz K, Nordenhem H. 2000. Feeding in the crowns of Scots pine trees by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Scand J Forest Res. 15:194–201. doi: 10.1080/028275800750015000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Nilsson U, Nordlander G. 1997. Pine weevil abundance on clear-cuttings of different ages: a 6-year study using pitfall traps. Scand J Forest Res. 12:225–240. doi: 10.1080/02827589709355405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Nilsson U. 1999. Effect of reforestation methods on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. Scand J Forest Res. 14:341–354. doi: 10.1080/02827589950152665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson Löfvenius M. 2010. Referensmätning av klimat vid skogliga försöksparkerna. Årsrapport 2010, 2011. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the unit for field-based forest research. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Ottosson Löfvenius M. 2011. Referensmätning av klimat vid skogliga försöksparkerna. Årsrapport 2010, 2011. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the unit for field-based forest research. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson M. 2004. Regeneration methods to reduce pine weevil damage to conifer seedlings [dissertation]. Alnarp: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Acta Universitatis agriculturae sueciae Silvestria.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson M, Örlander G. 2003. Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification, and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage. Can J Forest Res. 33:64–73. doi: 10.1139/x02-156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson M, Örlander G, Nordlander G. 2005. Soil features affecting damage to conifer seedlings by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Forestry. 78:83–92. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpi008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen A, Tomanen K, Kouki J, Jarvinen E, Viiri H. 2005. Effects of green tree retention, prescribed burning and soil treatment on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis and Hylobius pinastri) damage to planted Scots pine seedlings. Agric Forest Entomol. 7:319–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9555.2005.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala J, Harstela P, Saarinen VM, Tervo L. 2009. A techno-economic evaluation of bracke and M-planter tree planting devices. Silva Fenn. 43:659–667. doi: 10.14214/sf.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J. 1993. Survival model for Pinus sylvestris seedlings at risk from Hylobius abietis. Scand J Forest Res. 8:66–72. doi: 10.1080/02827589309382755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Immonen A, Raukko P. 1990. Resistance of naturally regenerated and nursery-raised Scots pine seedlings to the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Folia Forestalia. 766:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Skogsstatistisk årsbok. 2014. Skogsstyrelsen. Available from: http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Myndigheten/Statistik/Skogsstatistisk-Arsbok/Skogsstatistiska-arsbocker/.
   Google Scholar
• Solbreck C. 1980. Dispersal distances of migrating pine weevils, Hylobius abietis, Coleoptera curculionidae. Entomol Exp Appl. 28:123–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1980.tb02997.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbreck C, Gyldberg B. 1979. Temporal flight pattern of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis L. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), with special reference to the influence of weather. Z Angew Entomol. 88:532–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1979.tb02532.x
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk sentralbyrå. 2014. Skogkultur, 2013. [cited 2014 Jun 2]. Available from: http://www.ssb.no/jord-skog-jakt-og-fiskeri/statistikker/skogkultur.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsén A, Mattsson S, Weslien J. 2001. Influence of stem diameter on the survival and growth of containerized Norway spruce seedlings attacked by pine weevils (Hylobius spp.). Scand J Forest Res. 16:54–66. doi: 10.1080/028275801300004415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Sydow F. 1997. Abundance of pine weevils (Hylobius abietis) and damage to conifer seedlings in relation to silvicultural practices. Scand J Forest Res. 12:157–167. doi: 10.1080/02827589709355397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Sydow F, Örlander G. 1994. The influence of shelterwood density on Hylobius abietis (L.) occurrence and feeding on planted conifers. Scand J Forest Res. 9:367–375. doi: 10.1080/02827589409382853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainhouse D. 2004. Hylobius abietis – Host utilization and resistance. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire J-C, Evans HF, editors. Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 365–379.
   Google Scholar
• Wainhouse D, Staley J, Jinks R, Morgan G. 2009. Growth and defence in young pine and spruce and the expression of resistance to a stem-feeding weevil. Oecologia. 158:641–650. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1173-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainhouse D, Staley J, Johnston J, Boswell R. 2005. The effect of environmentally induced changes in the bark of young conifers on feeding behaviour and reproductive development of adult Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera : Curculionidae). Bull Entomol Res. 95:151–159. doi: 10.1079/BER2004344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallertz K. 2009. Pine weevil feeding in Scots pine and Norway spruce regenerations [dissertation]. Alnarp: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae.
   Google Scholar
• Wallertz K, Johansson U. 2011. Skyddseffekt mot snytbaggeskador för Merit Forest, Hylobi Forest och Conniflex. Rapport 1. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Unit for field-based forest research. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Wallertz K, Nordenhem H, Nordlander G. 2014. Damage by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis to seedlings of two native and five introduced tree species in Sweden. Silva Fenn. 48:1–14. doi: 10.14214/sf.1188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallertz K, Nordlander G, Örlander G. 2006. Feeding on roots in the humus layer by adult pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Agric Forest Entomol. 8:273–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2006.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallertz K, Petersson M. 2011. Pine weevil damage to Norway spruce seedlings: effects of nutrient-loading, soil inversion and physical protection during seedling establishment. Agric Forest Entomol. 13:413–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2011.00536.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar