The distribution of logging residues and its impact on seedling establishment and early plant growth in two Norway spruce stands

References

• Achat DL, Deleuze C, Landmann G, Pousse N, Ranger J, Augusto L. 2015. Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth – a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manage. 348:124–141. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandersson H, Eggertsson Karlström C. 2001. Temperaturen och nederbörden i Sverige 1961–1990. Referensnormaler – utgåva 2. SMHI Meteorologi, 99. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2014. Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry 2014. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Brække FH. 1994. Diagnostiske grenseverdier for næringselementer i gran-og furunåler. Aktuelt fra Skogforsk Nr. 15–94. Ås: NLH [Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Brække FH, Salih N, Ingerslev M. 1998. Nutrient status of stands – needle analyses. In: Andersson F, Brække FH, Hallbäcken L, editors. Nutrition and growth of Norway spruce forests in a Nordic climatic and deposition gradient. TemaNord 1998: 566. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; p. 152–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cambi M, Certini G, Neri F, Marchi E. 2015. The impact of heavy traffic on forest soils: a review. For Ecol Manage. 338:124–138. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter MC, Dean TJ, Wang Z, Newbold RA. 2006. Impacts of harvesting and postharvest treatments on soil bulk density, soil strength, and early growth of Pinus taeda in the Gulf Coastal Plain: a long-term soil productivity affiliated study. Can J For Res. 36:601–614. doi: 10.1139/x05-248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton JE, Cole DW. 1991. Impact of harvest intensity on growth and nutrition of successive rotations of Douglas-fir. In: Dyck WJ, Mees CA, editors. Long-term field trials to assess environmental impacts of harvesting. FRI Bulletin, 161. Rotorua: Forest Research Institute; p. 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Curran MP, Howes SW. 2011. Soil disturbance concerns regarding the use of forest biomass as a source of energy: examples from the Pacific northwestern North America. Biomass Bioenerg. 35:4547–4556. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell G. 2011. Is the site productivity decline in Norway spruce following whole-tree harvesting in the final felling in boreal Sweden permanent or temporary? For Ecol Manage. 261:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell G, Leijon B. 1999. Survival and growth of planted seedlings of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies after different levels of biomass removal in clear-felling. Scand J For Res. 14:303–311. doi: 10.1080/02827589950152610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell G, Valinger E. 2003. Survival, growth, and growth allocation of planted Scots pine trees after different levels of biomass removal in clear-felling. For Ecol Manage. 177:65–74. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00332-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenbies MH, Burger JA, Aust WM, Patterson SC. 2007. Changes in site productivity and the recovery of soil properties following wet- and dry weather harvesting disturbances in the Atlantic coastal plain for a stand of age 10 years. Can J For Res. 37:1336–1348. doi: 10.1139/X07-038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmett BA, Anderson JM, Hornung M. 1991. The controls of dissolved nitrogen losses following two intensities of harvesting in a Sitka spruce forest (N. Wales). For Ecol Manage. 41:65–80. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90119-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey TJ, Hill MO, Stevens PA, Hornung M, Rowland P. 1991. Nutrient accumulation in vegetation following conventional and whole-tree harvest of Sitka spruce plantations in North Wales. Forestry. 64:271–288. doi: 10.1093/forestry/64.3.271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming RL, Leblanc J-D, Hazlett PW, Weldon T, Irwin R, Mossa DS. 2014. Effects of biomass harvest intensity and soil disturbance on jack pine stand productivity: 15-year results. Can J For Res. 44:1566–1574. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming RL, Powers RF, Foster NW, Kranabetter JM, Scott DA, Ponder F, Berch S, Chapman WK, Kabzems RD, Ludovici KH, et al. 2006. Effects of organic matter removal, soil compaction, and vegetation control on 5-year seedling performance: a regional comparison of long-term soil productivity sites. Can J For Res. 36:529–550. doi: 10.1139/x05-271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington TB, Slesak RA, Schoenholtz SH. 2013. Variation in logging debris cover influences competitor abundance, resource availability, and early growth of planted Douglas-fir. For Ecol Manage. 296:41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmisaari HS, Hanssen KH, Jacobson S, Kukkola M, Luiro J, Saarsalmi A, Tamminen P, Tveite B. 2011. Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: long-term impact on tree growth. For Ecol Manage. 261:1919–1927. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson OQ. 1988. Biomass and nutrients in regenerating woody vegetation following whole-tree and conventional harvest in a northern mixed forest. Can J For Res. 18:1427–1436. doi: 10.1139/x88-221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heninger RL, Scott W, Dobkowski A, Miller R, Anderson H, Duke S. 2002. Soil disturbance and 10-year growth response of coast Douglas-fir on non-tilled and tilled skid trails in the Oregon Cascades. Can J For Res. 32:233–246. doi: 10.1139/x01-195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heninger RL, Scott W, Dobkowski A, Terry TA. 2011. Managing soil disturbance. In: Angima SD, Terry TA, editors. Best management practices for maintaining soil productivity in the Douglas-fir region. EM 9023. Corvallis: Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv; p. 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hesselink TP. 2010. Increasing pressure to use forest biomass: a conservation viewpoint. For Chron. 86:28–35. doi: 10.5558/tfc86028-1
   Google Scholar
• Hyvönen R, Olsson BA, Lundkvist H, Staaf H. 2000. Decomposition and nutrient release from Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus sylvestris L. logging residues. For Ecol Manage. 126:97–112. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson S, Filipsson J. 2013. Spatial distribution of logging residues after final felling – comparison between forest fuel adapted final felling and conventional final felling methods. Report No. 797. Uppsala: The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson S, Kukkola M, Mälkönen E, Tveite B. 2000. Impact of whole-tree harvesting and compensatory fertilization on growth of coniferous thinning stands. For Ecol Manage. 129:41–51. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00159-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson S, Mattsson S. 1998. Snurran – an Excel program for calculating site nutrient levels in logging residue [in Swedish with English summary]. Skogforsk Resultat no. 1. Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson P-E. 1987. Simulated soil temperature and moisture at a clearcutting in central Sweden. Scand J For Res. 2:127–140. doi: 10.1080/02827588709382452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaarakka L, Tamminen P, Saarsalmi A, Kukkola M, Helmisaari H-S, Burton AJ. 2014. Effects of repeated whole-tree harvesting on soil properties and tree growth in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand. For Ecol Manage. 313:180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabzems R. 2012. Aspen and white spruce productivity is reduced by organic matter removal and soil compaction. For Chron. 88:306–316. doi: 10.5558/tfc2012-058
   Google Scholar
• Kallio AMI, Salminen O, Sievänen R. 2013. Sequester or substitute – consequences of increased production of wood based energy on the carbon balance in Finland. J Forest Econ. 19:402–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälkönen E. 1976. Effects of whole-tree harvesting on soil fertility. Silva Fennica. 10:157–164. doi: 10.14214/sf.a14790
   Google Scholar
• Marklund L-G. 1988. Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden. Report No. 45. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Survey [in Swedish with English summary].
   Google Scholar
• Mason WL, McKay HM, Weatherall A, Connolly P, Harrison AJ. 2012. The effects of whole-tree harvesting on three sites in upland Britain on the growth of Sitka spruce over ten years. Forestry. 85:111–123. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpr064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Kwiaton MM, Duckert DR. 2014. Black spruce growth response to varying levels of biomass harvest intensity across a range of soil types: 15-year results. Can J For Res. 44:313–325. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris LA, Miller RE. 1994. Evidence for long-term productivity change as provided by field trials. In: Dyck WJ, Cole DW, Comerford NB, editors. Impacts of forest harvesting on long-term site productivity. London: Chapman and Hall; p. 41–80.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmi J. 2007. Recovery of logging residues for energy from spruce (Picea abies) dominated stands. Biomass Bioenerg. 31:375–380. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson BA, Lundkvist H, Staaf H. 2000. Nutrient status in needles of Norway spruce and Scots pine following harvesting of logging residues. Plant Soil. 223:161–173. doi: 10.1023/A:1026565314345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palviainen M, Finér L, Kurka AM, Mannerkoski H, Piirainen S, Starr M. 2004. Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residues after clear-cutting of mixed boreal forest. Plant Soil. 263:53–67. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047718.34805.fb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passauer DP, Aust WM, Bolding MC, Strahm BD, Burger JM, Patterson SC, Vance E, Tal Roberts E Jr. 2013. Potential above-ground biomass losses from severe soil rutting during wet weather timber harvests of Coastal Plain loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations mitigated by mechanical site preparation. For Ecol Manage. 307:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltola S, Kilpelainen H, Asikainen A. 2011. Recovery rates of logging residue harvesting in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karsten) dominated stands. Biomass Bioenerg. 35:1545–1551. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proe MF, Cameron AD, Dutch J, Christodoulou XC. 1996. The effect of whole-tree harvesting on the growth of second rotation Sitka spruce. Forestry. 69:389–401. doi: 10.1093/forestry/69.4.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proe MF, Dutch J. 1994. Impact of whole-tree harvesting on second-rotation growth of Sitka spruce: the first 10 years. For Ecol Manage. 66:39–54. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)90147-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proe MF, Dutch J, Griffiths J. 1994. Harvest residue effect on micro-climate, nutrition, and early growth of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) seedlings on a restock site. NZ J For Sci. 24:390–401.
   Google Scholar
• Proe MF, Griffiths JH, McKay HM. 2001. Effect of whole-tree harvesting on microclimate during establishment of second rotation forestry. Agric For Meteorol. 110:141–154. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00285-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repo A, Tuovinen JP, Liski J. 2015. Can we produce carbon and climate neutral forest bioenergy? GCB Bioenerg. 7:253–262. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring E, Högbom L, Jacobson S, Nohrstedt H-Ö. 2015. Soil and soil-water chemistry below different amounts of logging residues at two harvested forest sites in Sweden. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 4 article id 1265. doi:10.14214/sf.1265 [including corrections].
   Google Scholar
• Roberts SD, Harrington CA, Terry TA. 2005. Harvest residue and competing vegetation affect soil moisture, soil temperature, N availability, and Douglas-fir seedling growth. For Ecol Manage. 205:333–350. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott DA, Dean TJ. 2006. Energy trade-offs between intensive biomass utilization, site productivity loss, and ameliorative treatments in loblolly pine plantations. Biomass Bioenerg. 30:1001–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolander A, Kitunen V, Kukkola M, Tamminen P. 2013. Response of soil organic layer characteristics to logging residues in three Scots pine thinning stands. Soil Biol Biochem. 66:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolander A, Kitunen V, Tamminen P, Kukkola M. 2010. Removal of logging residue in Norway spruce thinning stands, long-term changes in organic layer properties. Soil Biol Biochem. 42:1222–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolander A, Levula T, Kitunen V. 2008. Response of litter decomposition and soil C and N transformations in a Norway spruce thinning stand to removal of logging residue. For Ecol Manage. 256:1080–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolander A, Saarsalmi A, Tamminen P. 2015. Response of soil nutrient content, organic matter characteristics and growth of Scots pine and spruce seedlings to logging residues. For Ecol Manage. 357:117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterba H. 1988. Increment losses by full-tree harvesting in Norway spruce (Picea abies). For Ecol Manage. 24:283–292. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(88)90105-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens PA, Hornung M. 1990. Effect of harvest intensity and ground flora establishment on inorganic-N leaching from a Sitka spruce plantation in north Wales, UK. Biogeochemistry. 10:53–65. doi: 10.1007/BF00000892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupak I, Asikainen A, Jonsell M, Karltun E, Lunnan A, Mizaraite D, Pasanen K, Parn H, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Roser D, et al. 2007. Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy – possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass Bioenerg. 31:666–684. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiffault E, Hannam KD, Paré D, Titus BD, Hazlett PW, Maynard DG, Brais S. 2011. Effects of forest biomass harvesting on soil productivity in boreal and temperate forests – a review. Environ Rev. 19:278–309. doi: 10.1139/a11-009
   Google Scholar
• Titus BD, Malcolm DC. 1999. The long-term decomposition of Sitka spruce needles in brash. Forestry. 72:207–221. doi: 10.1093/forestry/72.3.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance ED, Aust WM, Strahm BD, Froese RE, Harrison RB, Morris LA. 2014. Biomass harvesting and soil productivity: Is science meeting policy needs? Soil Sci Soc Am J. doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0323nafsc
   Google Scholar
• Vanguelova E, Pitman R, Luiro J, Helmisaari H-S. 2010. Long term effects of whole tree harvesting on soil carbon and nutrient sustainability in the UK. Biogeochemistry. 101:43–59. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9511-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallertz K, Holt Hanssen K, Hjelm K & Sundheim Fløistad I. 2016. Effects of planting time on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to Norway spruce seedlings. Scand J For Res. 31(3):262–270. doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1125523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley JD, Jones DL, Reynolds B, Price MH, Healey JR. 2009. Whole-tree harvesting can reduce second rotation forest productivity. For Ecol Manage. 257:1104–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weetman GF, Webber B. 1972. The influence of wood harvesting on the nutrient status of two spruce stands. Can J For Res. 2:351–369. doi: 10.1139/x72-054
   Google Scholar
• Wibe S. 2012. Carbon dioxide emissions from wood fuels in Sweden 1980–2100. J For Econ. 18:123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar