Comparing regional forest policy scenarios in terms of predicted suitable habitats for the Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans)

References

• Axelsson A-L. 2001. Forest landscape change in boreal Sweden 1850–2000 – a multi-scale approach [doctoral dissertation]. Silvestria: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences [Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae]. 183 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bean WT, Stafford R, Brashares JB. 2012. The effects of small sample size and sample bias on threshold selection and accuracy assessment of species distribution models. Ecography. 35:250–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley BA, Olsson AD, Wang O, Dickson BG, Pelech L, Sesnie SE, Zachmann LJ. 2012. Species detection vs. habitat suitability: are we biasing habitat suitability models with remotely sensed data? Ecol Model. 244:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson M. 1999. A method for integrated planning of timber production and biodiversity: a case study. Can J Forest Res. 29:1183–1191. doi: 10.1139/x99-058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrochers A, Hanski IK, Selonen V. 2003. Siberian flying squirrel responses to high- and low-contrast forest edges. Landscape Ecol. 18:543–552. doi: 10.1023/A:1026006311944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenius L, Mikusiński G. 2006. Utility of habitat suitability models as biodiversity assessment tools in forest management. Scand J For Res. 21:62–72. doi: 10.1080/14004080500486989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid T, Hobbelstad K. 2000. AVVIRK-2000: a large-scale forestry scenario model for long-term investment, income and harvest analyses. Scand J For Res. 15:472–482. doi: 10.1080/028275800750172736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid T, Hoen HF, Okseter P. 2002. Timber production possibilities of the Norwegian forest area and measures for a sustainable forestry. For Pol Econ. 4:187–200. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00069-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson LO, Sallnäs O, Ståhl G. 2007. Forest certification and Swedish wood supply. For Pol Econ. 9:452–463. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Biodiversity Research Strategy 2010–2020. 2010. European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy (EPBRS) – promoting knowledge for sustainability [cited 2012 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.epbrs.org/PDF/EPBRS_StrategyBDResearch_May2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1992. The habitats directive [cited 2012 Jul 13]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1998. Biodiversity strategy 1998. COM (1998)42. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a European Community biodiversity strategy [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/policy/policy_dev_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. EU biodiversity action plan. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond – sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being [cited 2012 Mar 21]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fazakas Z, Nilsson M, Olsson H. 1999. Regional forest biomass and wood volume estimation using satellite data and ancillary data. Agr For Meteorol. 98–99:417–425. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00112-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps, Documentation. 2015. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Landscape ecology program [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats_documents.html
   Google Scholar
• Hanski IK. 1998. Home range and habitat use in the declining flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) in managed forests. Wildl Biol. 4:33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski, IK. 2006. Liito-oravan (Pteromys volans) Suomen kannan koon arviointi. Loppuraportti. Ympäristöministeriö [Assessing the distribution of Siberian flying squirrel in Finland. Final report] [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.ymparisto.fi/fi-FI/Luonto/Lajit/Lajiensuojelutyo/Yksittaisten_lajien_suojelu/Liitooravan_suojelu (in Finnish)
   Google Scholar
• Hanski IK, Stevens PC, Ihalempiä P, Selonen V. 2000. Home-range size, movements, and nest-site use in the Siberian flying squirrel, Pteromys volans. J Mammal. 81:798–809. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0798:HRSMAN>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill KE, Binford MW. 2002. The role of category definition in habitat models: practical and logical limitations of using Boolean, indexed, probabilistic, and fuzzy categories. In: Scott MJ, Heglund PJ, Morrison JB, et al., editors. Predicting species occurrence, issues of accuracy and scale. Washington, DC: Island Press; p. 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N. 2002. Ecological-niche factor analyses: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology. 83:2027–2036. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2027:ENFAHT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurme E, Mökkönen M, Nikula A, Nikula V, Reunanen P, Heikkinen T, Nivala V, Ukkola M. 2005. Building and evaluating predictive occupancy models for the Siberian flying squirrel using forest planning data. For Ecol Manage. 216:241–256. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J, Ojansuu R, Hökkä H, Siipilehto J, Salminen H, Haapala P. 2002. Models for predicting stand development in MELA system. Research Papers, 835. Vantaa: The Finnish Forest Research Institute, 116 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset [Forest management practice recommendations]. 2006. Helsinki: Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio. 100 p. (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Inkinen M, Engdahl M, Linko S, Zhu Y-H. 2000. Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes. For Ecol Manage. 128:109–120. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00278-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juslén A, Kuusinen M, Muona J, Siitonen J, Toivonen H, editors. 2008. Puutteellisesti tunnettujen ja uhanalaisten metsälajien tutkimusohjelma – loppuraportti [Research programme of deficiently known and threatened forest species – the final report]. Suomen Ympäristö 1; 2008. Ympäristöministeriö, Ministry of the Environment. Edita Prima Oy, Helsinki. 416 p. (in Finnish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen L, Nuutinen T, Hirvelä H, Mäkelä H. 2011. Effects of administrative land-use and technical land-form constraints on timber production at the landscape level. Scand J For Res. 26(2):120–127. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.536568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliskey AD, Lofroth EC, Thompson WA, Brown S, Schreier H. 1999. Simulating and evaluating alternative resource-use strategies using GIS-based habitat suitability indices. Landsc Urban Plan. 45:163–175. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00056-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurttila M, Pukkala T, Loikkanen J. 2002. The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. For Ecol Manage. 166:245–260. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00664-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T. 2002. Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fenn. 36(1):97–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappi J. 1992. JLP: a linear programming package for management planning. Research Papers, 414. Suonenjoki: The Finnish Forest Research Institute. 134 p.
   Google Scholar
• Larson MA, Thompson FR, Millspaugh JJ, Dijak WD, Shifley SR. 2004. Linking population viability, habitat suitability, and landscape simulation models for conservation planning. Ecol Model. 180:103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson CR, Hodgson JA, Wilson RJ, Richards SA. 2014. Prevalence, thresholds and the performance of presence–absence models. Methods Ecol Evol. 5:54–64. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder P, Östlund L. 1998. Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885–1996. Biol Conserv. 85:9–19. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. 2005. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 28:385–393. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö. 2006. Alueelliset metsäohjelmat 2006–2010 – yhteenveto metsäkeskusten metsäohjelmista [Regional forest programmes 2006–2010 – summary of forestry centres’ forest programmes]. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö 4/2006, Helsinki (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö ja ympäristöministeriö. 2008. MOSSE Monimuotoisuuden tutkimusohjelma (2003–2006) [The biodiversity and monitoring programme MOSSE (2003–2006)]. Loppuraportti ja itsearviointi [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.metsonpolku.fi/fi/hankkeet/Aineistot_toimenpiteiden_seuranta/MOSSE_monimuotoisuuden_tutkimusohjelma_2003-2006_loppuraportti-ja_itsearviointi2008.pdf (in Finnish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä H, Hirvelä H, Nuutinen T, Kärkkäinen L. 2011. Estimating forest data for analyses of forest production and utilization possibilities at village-level by means of multi-source National Forest Inventory. For Ecol Manage. 262:1345–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä H, Pekkarinen A. 2001. Estimation of timber volume at the sample plot level by means of image segmentation and Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 77:66–75. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00194-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markkanen S, Vieno M, Walls M. 2002. Finnish biodiversity research project FIBRE 1997–2002. Summary report. Biodiversity Research Programme FIBRE. 154 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment. 1997. The National Action Plan for biodiversity in Finland 1997–2005 [cited 2012 Mar 20]. Available from: www.cbd.int/doc/world/fi/fi-nr-01-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment. 2007. Saving nature for people. The National Strategy and Action Plan for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in Finland 2006–2016 [cited 2012 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.cbd.int/doc/world/fi/fi-nbsap-v2-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Narendra P, Goldberg M. 1980. Image segmentation with directed trees. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. PAMI-2(2):185–191. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1980.4766999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke). 2015. Statistical services. Roundwood removals and drain. Database tables [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://stat.luke.fi/en/roundwood-removals-and-drain
   Google Scholar
• Nuutinen T, Hanski IK, Hirvelä H, Mäkelä, H. 2010. Liito-oravan mahdolliset elinympäristöt Etelä-Suomessa ja niiden kehittyminen eri hakkuuskenaarioissa 2005–2055 [Potential habitats of the Siberian flying squirrel in South Finland and their development in different cutting scenarios in 2005–2055]. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja; 3/2010; p. 315–321 (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Nuutinen T, Hirvelä H. 2006. Hakkuumahdollisuudet Suomessa valtakunnan metsien 10. inventoinnin perusteella [Forest production possibilities according to the 10th National Forest Inventory]. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja; 1B/2006; p. 223–237 (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Nuutinen T, Hirvelä H, Hynynen J, Härkönen K, Hökkä H, Korhonen KT, Salminen, O. 2000. The role of peatlands in Finnish wood production – an analysis based on large-scale forest scenario modelling. Silva Fenn. 34(2):131–153. doi: 10.14214/sf.636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuutinen T, Hirvelä H, Salminen O, Härkönen K. 2007. Alueelliset hakkuumahdollisuudet valtakunnan metsien 10. inventoinnin perusteella, maastotyöt 2004–2006 [Regional forest production possibilities according to the 10th National Forest Inventory, field inventory in 2004–2006]. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja; 2B/2007; p. 215–248 (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Ognev SI. 1966. Mammals of the U.S.S.R. and adjacent countries. Vol. IV. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations.
   Google Scholar
• Packalen T, Sallnäs O, Sirkiä S, Korhonen K, Salminen O, Vidal C, Robert N, Colin A, Belouard T, Schadauer K, et al. 2014. The European forestry dynamics model (EFDM). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 17 p. ISBN 978-92-79-44671-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce J, Ferrier S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model. 133:225–245. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen A. 2002. Image segment-based spectral features in the estimation of timber volume. Remote Sens Environ. 82(2–3):349–359. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00052-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira JMC, Itami RM. 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: a study of the Mt. Graham Red Squirrel. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 57:1475–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassi P, Alanen A, Kanerva T, Mannerkoski I, editors. 2001. The red list of Finnish species. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute (in Finnish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Rassi P, Hyvärinen P, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I, editors. 2010. The 2010 red list of Finnish species. Ministry of the Environment and Finnish Environment Institute [cited 2015 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.ym.fi/en-US/Latest_news/Publications/Monographs/List_of_available_monographs_in_English(4482)
   Google Scholar
• Redsven V, Hirvelä H, Härkönen K, Salminen O, Siitonen M. 2007. MELA2007 reference manual. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. 642 p. [cited 2012 Jul 13]. Available from: http://mela2.metla.fi/mela/julkaisut/oppaat/mela2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rempel RS, Kaufmann CK. 2003. Spatial modeling of harvest constraints on wood supply versus wildlife habitat objectives. Environ Man. 32:646–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reunanen P, Mönkkönen M, Nikula A. 2002. Habitat requirements of the Siberian flying squirrel in northern Finland: comparing field survey and remote sensing data. Ann Zool Fenn. 39:7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangeli A, Hanski IK, Mäkelä H. 2013. Integrating multi-source forest inventory and animal survey data to assess nationwide distribution and habitat correlates of the Siberian flying squirrel. Biol Conserv. 157:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JM, Heglund JP, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB. editors. 2002. Predicting species occurrences, issues of accuracy and scale. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Hanski IK. 2003. Movements of the flying squirrel Pteromys volans in corridors and in matrix habitat. Ecography. 26:641–651. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Hanski IK. 2004. Young flying squirrels (Pteromys volans) dispersing in fragmented forests. Behav Ecol. 15:564–571. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Hanski IK, Stevens PC. 2001. Space use of the Siberian flying squirrel Pteromys volans in fragmented forest landscapes. Ecography. 24:588–600. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.d01-214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull. 49:11–41.
   Google Scholar
• Siitonen M, Härkönen K, Hirvelä H, Jämsä J, Kilpeläinen H, Salminen O, Teuri M. 1996. MELA handbook – 1996 edition. Research Papers, 622. Helsinki: The Finnish Forest Research Institute. 452 p.
   Google Scholar
• Skarén U. 1978. Liito-oravan esiintymisestä ja talviravinnosta Pohjois-Savossa [Occurence and winter diet of the flying squirrel in northern Savonia]. Luonnon Tutkija. 82:139–140 ( in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Stighäll K, Roberge J-M, Andersson K, Angelstam P. 2011. Usefulness of biophysical proxy data for modelling habitat of an endangered forest species: the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos. Scand J For Res. 26:576–585. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.599813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm U, Kiristaja P. 2002. The Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) in Estonia. Acta Zool Lituanica. 12:433–436. doi: 10.1080/13921657.2002.10512535
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E. 1991. Satellite image-based National Forest Inventory of Finland. In: Proceedings of the symposium on global and environmental monitoring, techniques and impacts; 1990 Sep 17–21; Victoria, British Columbia. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, Part 7-1, p. 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Haakana M, Katila M, Mäkisara K, Peräsaari J. 2009. The multi-source National Forest Inventory of Finland – methods and results 2005. Working papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, 111 [cited 2012 July 13]. Available from: http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2009/mwp111.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomppo E, Haakana M, Katila M, Peräsaari J. 2008. Multi-source national forest inventory. Methods and applications. Manag For Ecosyst. 18. Springer. 374 p.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1992. Convention on biodiversity [cited 2012 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
   Google Scholar