Indications that site preparation increases forest ecosystem carbon stocks in the long term

References

• Andersson SO. 1954. Funktioner och tabeller för kubering av småträd [Functions and tables for measurements of small trees]. Stockholm: Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut 44:12, 29 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Archibold OW, Acton C, Ripley EA. 2000. Effect of site preparation on soil properties and vegetation cover, and the growth and survival of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings, in Saskatchewan. For Ecol Manage. 131:127–141. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00205-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandel G. 1990. Volymfunktioner för enskilda träd. Tall, gran och björk. [Volume functions for individual trees. Pine, Spruce and Birch.]. Garpenberg: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Institutionen för skogsproduktion, Rapport 26, 72 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Burton P, Bedford L, Goldstein M, Osberg M. 2000. Effects of disk trench orientation and planting spot position on the ten-year performance of lodgepole pine. New For. 20:23–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1006796412006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callesen I, Liski J, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Olsson MT, Tau-Strand L, Vesterdal L, Westman CJ. 2003. Soil carbon stores in Nordic well-drained forest soils—relationships with climate and texture class. Global Change Biol. 9:358–370. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cintas O, Berndes G, Hansson J, Poudel BC, Bergh J, Börjesson P, Egnell G, Lundmark T, Nordin A. 2017. The potential role of forest management in Swedish scenarios towards climate neutrality by mid-century. For Ecol Manage. 383:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit HA, Kvindesland S. 1999. Carbon stocks in Norwegian forest soils and effects of forest management on carbon storage. Rapport fra Skogforskningen – Supplement 14. Ås, Norway: The Norwegian Forest Research Institute (NISK). 52 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Devine WD, Harrington CA. 2007. Influence of harvest residues and vegetation on microsite soil and air temperatures in a young conifer plantation. Agr For Meteorol. 145:125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell G, Jurevics A, Peichl M. 2015. Negative effects of stem and stump harvest and deep soil cultivation on the soil carbon and nitrogen pools are mitigated by enhanced tree growth. For Ecol Manage. 338:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekö PM, Johansson U, Petersson N, Bergqvist J, Elfving B, Frisk J. 2008. Current growth differences of Norway spruce (P. abies), Scots pine (P. sylvestris) and birch (Betula pendula and Betula pubescens) in different regions in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 23:307–318. doi: 10.1080/02827580802249126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott J, Toth B, Granger R, Pomeroy J. 1998. Soil moisture storage in mature and replanted sub-humid boreal forest stands. Can J Soil Sci. 78:17–27. doi: 10.4141/S97-021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson H. 1973. Volymfunktioner för stående träd av ask, asp, klibbal och contortatall [Volume functions for standing trees of ash, aspen, alder and lodgepole pine]. Stockholm: Institutionen för skogsproduktion. Skogshögskolan. Rapporter och uppsatser. 26 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming RL, Black TA, Adams RS. 1996. Site preparation effects on Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine water relations following planting in a pinegrass-dominated clearcut. For Ecol Manage. 83:47–60. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03701-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman M, Morén AS, Strömgren M, Linder S. 2005. Climate change impacts on forest in Europe: biological impact mechanisms. In: Kellomäki S, Leinonen S, editors. Management of European forests under changing climatic conditions. Research Notes 163. Joensuu: Forest faculty, University of Joensuu, p. 46–163.
   Google Scholar
• Fries C. 1993. Development of planted P. sylvestris and P. contorta after soil preparation in a northern climate. Scand J For Res. 8:73–80. doi: 10.1080/02827589309382756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessler A, Schneider S, von Sengbusch D, Weber P, Hanemann U, Huber C, Rothe A, Kreutzer K, Rennenberg H. 1998. Field and laboratory experiments on net uptake of nitrate and ammonium by the roots of spruce (P. abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees. New Phytol. 138:275–285. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00107.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale CL, Apps MJ, Birdsey RA, Field CB, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jenkins JC, Kohlmaier GH, Kurz W, Liu SR, et al.2002. Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecol Appl. 12:891–899. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0891:FCSITN]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington CA, Piatek KB, Debell DS. 2003. Site preparation effects on 20 year survival and growth of douglas-Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and on selected soil properties. West J Appl For. 18:44–51.
   Google Scholar
• IUSS. 2007. Working group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103, FAO, Rome. On-line version, 2007. 128 pp. www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/images/resources/pdf_documents/wrb2007_red.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jandl R, Linder M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz KA, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA. 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma. 137:253–268. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M-B. 1991. The influence of soil scarification on turn-over rate of organic matter and nitrogen release at clear-cut areas in the north of Sweden. Finnish Humus News. 3:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson M-B. 1994. The influence of soil scarification on turn-over rate of organic matter and nitrogen release at clear-cut areas in the north of Sweden. Scand J For Res. 9:170–179. doi: 10.1080/02827589409382828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson K, Ring E, Högbom L. 2013. Effects of pre-harvest fertilization and subsequent soil scarification on the growth of planted P. sylvestris seedlings and ground vegetation after clear-felling. Silva Fennica. 47. doi: 10.14214/sf.1016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DW. 1992. Effects of forest management on soil carbon storage. Water Air Soil Poll. 64:83–120. doi: 10.1007/BF00477097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurevics A, Peichl M, Olsson BA, Strömgren M, Egnell G. 2016. Slash and stump harvest have no general impact on soil and tree biomass C pools after 32-39 years. For Ecol Manage. 371:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubin E, Kemppainen L. 1994. Effect of soil preparation of boreal spruce forest on air and soil temperature conditions in forest regeneration areas. Acta Forestalia Fennica. 244:56.
   Google Scholar
• Lamlom SH, Savidge RA. 2003. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy. 25:381–388. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langvall O, Nilsson U, Örlander G. 2001. Frost damage to planted Norway spruce seedlings – influence of site preparation and seedling type. For Ecol Manage. 141:223–235. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00331-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liski J, Westman CJ. 1997. Carbon storage in forest soil of Finland. Size and regional pattern. Biogeochem. 36:261–274. doi: 10.1023/A:1005742523056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark-Thelin A, Johansson M-B. 1997. Influence of mechanical site preparation on decomposition and nutrient dynamics of Norway spruce (P. abies (L) Karst) needle litter and slash needles. For Ecol Manage. 96:101–110. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00040-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallik AU, Hu D. 1997. Soil respiration following site preparation treatments in boreal mixed wood forest. For Ecol Manage. 97:265–275. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00067-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marklund LG. 1988. Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk i Sverige [Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden]. Umeå: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skogstaxering. 75 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson S, Bergsten U. 2003. P. contorta growth in northern Sweden as affected by soil scarification. New For. 26:217–231. doi: 10.1023/A:1024425205712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellander P-E, Bishop K, Lundmark T. 2004. The influence of soil temperature on transpiration: a plot scale manipulation in a young Scots pine stand. For Ecol Manage. 195:15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjöfors K, Strömgren M, Nohrstedt H-Ö, Gärdenäs AI. 2015. Impact of site-preparation on soil-surface CO2 fluxes and litter decomposition in a clear-cut in Sweden. Silva Fenn. 49:1–20. doi:10.14214/sf.1403. Article id: 1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muukkonen P, Häkkinen M, Mäkipää R. 2009. Spatial variation in soil carbon in the organic layer of managed boreal forest soil—implications for sampling design. Environ Monit Assess. 158:67–76. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0565-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo K. 1999. Effect of site preparation and reforestation method on survival and height growth of scots pine. Scand J For Res. 14:512–525. doi: 10.1080/02827589908540816
   Google Scholar
• Mäkitalo K, Hyvönen J. 2004. Late-summer soil water content on clear-cut reforestation areas two decades after site preparation in Finnish Lapland. For Ecol Manage. 189:57–75. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt H-O. 2000. Effects of soil scarification and previous N fertilisation on pools of inorganic N in soil after clear-felling of a P. sylvestris (L.) stand. Silva Fenn. 34:195–204. doi: 10.14214/sf.625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordborg F, Nilsson U, Gemmel P, Örlander G. 2006. Carbon and nitrogen stocks in soil, trees and field vegetation in conifer plantations 10 years after deep soil cultivation and patch scarification. Scand J For Res. 21:356–363. doi: 10.1080/02827580600976615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordborg F, Nilsson U, Örlander G. 2003. Effects of different soil treatments on growth and net nitrogen uptake of newly planted P. abies (L.) Karst. seedlings. For Ecol Manage. 180:571–582. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00650-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlander G, Hellqvist C, Johansson K, Nordenhem H. 2011. Regeneration of European boreal forests: Effectiveness of measures against seedling mortality caused by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. For Ecol Manage. 262:2354–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Egnell G, Albrektson A. 1996. Long-term effects of site preparation on growth in Scots pine. For Ecol Manage. 86:27–37. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03797-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Gemmel P, Hunt J. 1990. Site preparation: a Swedish overview. FRDA Report 105: 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Hallsby G, Gemmel P, Wilhelmsson C. 1998. Inverting improves establishment of P. contorta and P. abies – 10-year results from a site preparation trial in Northern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 13:160–168. doi: 10.1080/02827589809382972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Nilsson U. 1999. Effect of reforestation methods on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. Scand J For Res. 14:341–354. doi: 10.1080/02827589950152665
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz C, Liski J, Gärdenäs AI, Lehtonen A, Lundblad M, Stendahl J, Ågren GI, Karltun E. 2013. Soil organic carbon stock changes in Swedish forest soils – A comparison of uncertainties and their sources through a national inventory and two simulation models. Ecol Modell. 251:221–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson H, Ståhl G. 2006. Functions for below-ground biomass of P. sylvestris, P. abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 21:84–93. doi: 10.1080/14004080500486864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumpanen J, Westman CJ, Ilvesniemi H. 2004. Soil CO2 efflux from a podzolic forest soil before and after forest clear-cutting and site preparation. Boreal Environ Res. 9:199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon-dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B. 44:81–99. doi: 10.3402/tellusb.v44i2.15428
   Google Scholar
• Skogssverige. 2014. Available form: http://skogssverige.se/skog/berakna-sjalv. [Cited Aug 2014].
   Google Scholar
• SMHI. 2014. Available from: www.smhi.se. [Cited Mar 2014].
   Google Scholar
• SOU - Swedish Government Official Reports. 2016. En klimat- och luftvårdsstrategi för Sverige Del 1 [A climate and air quality strategy for Sweden part 1]. SOU 2016:47. Elanders Sverige AB. www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2016/06/en-klimat--och-luftvardsstrategi-for-sverige/ accessed Nov 2016. In Swedish. ISBN 978-91-38-24469-2, ISSN 0375-250X. 21–22 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Strömgren M, Mjöfors K. 2012. Soil-CO2 flux after patch scarification, harrowing and stump harvest in a hemi-boreal forest. Scand J For Res. 27:754–761. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2012.723741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömgren M, Mjöfors K, Holmström B, Grelle A. 2012. Soil CO2 flux during the first years after stump harvesting in two Swedish forests. Silva Fenn. 46:67–79. doi: 10.14214/sf.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömgren M, Mjöfors K, Olsson BA. 2017. Soil-surface CO2 flux during the first 2 years after stump harvesting and site preparation in 14 Swedish forests. Scand J For Res. 32:213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugg A. 1990. Seedling establishment results from a site preparation study in southern Sweden: the first four years survival and growth of Scots pine (P. sylvestris (L.)) and Norway spruce (P. abies (L.) Karst.). Umeå: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. Institutionen för skogsskötsel. Rapporter nr 31.
   Google Scholar
• Sutinen R, Pänttäjä M, Teirilä A, Sutinen M-L. 2006. Effect of mechanical site preparation on soil quality in former Norway spruce sites. Geoderma. 136:411–422. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental and Protection Agency. 2016. National Inventory Report Sweden 2015. Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2016. Återväxternas kvalitet 2015/2016 [Quality of the regrowth 2015/2016]. Statistiska meddelanden JO 0311 SM 1601. In Swedish. Available at: www.skogsstyrelsen.se
   Google Scholar
• Uri V, Aosaar J, Varik M, Becker H, Kukumägi M, Ligi K, Pärn L, Kanal A. 2015. Biomass resource and environmental effects of Norway spruce (P. abies) stump harvesting: an Estonian case study. For Ecol Manage. 335:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viro PJ. 1952. Kivisyyden määrittämisestä [On the determination of stoniness]. Commun Inst For Fenn. 40:1–23. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Webster R. 2000. Is soil variation random? Geoderma. 97:149–163. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding L, Drees L, Nordt L. 2000. Spatial variability: enhancing the mean estimate of organic and inorganic carbon in a sampling unit. In:Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA, editors. Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 69–86.
   Google Scholar