References
- Adams WT, Hipkins VD, Burczyk J, Randall WK. 1997. Pollen contamination trends in a maturing Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can J For Res. 27:131–134. doi: 10.1139/x96-129
- Di Luca MC. 2013. A Table Interpolation Program for Stand Yields (TIPSY) vers. 4.3, 2013. Min. Forests and Nat. Res. Oper. Forest Analysis Br., Victoria, BC, CA. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hre/software/download.html
- El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K. 1986. The relation of outcrossing and contamination to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silv Genet. 26:240–244.
- Funda T, Wennström U, Almqvist C, Andersson-Gull B, Wang X-R. 2016. Mating dynamics of Scots pine in isolation tents. Tree Genet Genom. 12:112–129. doi: 10.1007/s11295-016-1074-z
- Funda T, Wennström U, Almqvist C, Torimaru T, Andersson-Gull B, Wang, X-R. 2015. Low rates of pollen contamination in a Scots pine seed orchard in Sweden: the exception or the norm? Scand J For Res. 30(7):573–586. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1036306
- Kees T, El-Kassaby YA. 2015. Estimates of pollen contamination and selfing in a coastal Douglas-fir seed orchard. Scand J For Res. 60:266–275.
- Korecky J, El-Kassaby YA. 2016. Pollination dynamics variation in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as revealed by microsatellite analysis. Silva Fenn. 50:1–12. doi: 10.14214/sf.1682
- Slavov GT, Howe GT, Adams WT. 2005. Pollen contamination and matting patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers. Can J For Res. 35:1592–1603. doi: 10.1139/x05-082
- Stoehr MU, Webber JE, Hollefreund CA, Painter RA. 2004. Pollen contamination effects on progeny performance from an off-site Douglas-fir seed orchard: 9-year field results. Can J For Res. 34:981–984. doi: 10.1139/x03-246
- Stoehr MU, Webber JE, Painter RA. 1994. Pollen contamination effects on progeny performance from an off-site Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can J For Res. 24:2113–2117. doi: 10.1139/x94-271
- Stoehr M, Webber J, Woods J. 2004. Protocol for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia: quantifying genetic gain and diversity. Forestry 77:297–303. doi: 10.1093/forestry/77.4.297
- Torimaru T, Wennström U, Andersson B, Almqvist C, Wang X-R. 2013. Reduction of pollen contamination in Scots pine seed orchard crop by tent isolation. Scand J For Res. 28(8):715–723. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2013.838298
- Webber JE, Painter RA. 1996. Douglas-fir pollen management manual. 2nd Edn. Ministry of Forests, Research Branch. Wok. Pap. 02/1996. 91pp.
- Wennström U, Funda T, Wang X-R, Almqvist C, Andersson-Gull B. 2014. Reduced background pollination using high tunnels. In: Abstracts of IUFRO2014 Forest Tree Breeding Conference, Prague, August 25–29, 2014.
- Wheeler N, Jech K. 1986. Pollen contamination in a mature Douglas-fir seed orchard. In: Williamsburg Va., Weir RJ, editors. Proc. IUFRO Confer. on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing and Seed Orchards. October 12–17, 1986. Raleigh: North Carolina State University; p. 160–171.
- Woods J. 2016. Forest Genetics Council of BC Business Plan 2015/16: Species Plan. Available from: http://www.fgcouncil.bc.ca/SpeciesPlan-spu01.pdf
- Woods JH, Stoehr MU, Webber JE. 1996. Protocols for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia. Ministry of Forests, Research Program, Res. Report 06. 26pp.
- Xie C-Y, Yanchuk AD. 2003. Breeding values of parental trees, genetic worth of seed orchard seedlots and yields of improved stocks in British Columbia. West J Appl For. 18(2):88–100.
- Yamada Y. 1962. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlation of the same trait under different environments. Jap J Genet. 37:498–509. doi: 10.1266/jjg.37.498